Wookieepedia

READ MORE

Wookieepedia
Don't have an account?
Register
Advertisement
Register
Wookieepedia
In a galaxy far, far away....
193,032
pages
in: Semi-protected pages, Move protected pages, Wookieepedia Featured article nomination pages

Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

View source
Featured
article
nominations
Premium-FeaturedIcon

This page is for Featured article nominations. A Featured article is an article that is of complete quality and represents the best a Wookieepedia article can be. It is for fully fleshed out subjects that go beyond the limited content of Good and Comprehensive articles. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe are ready to be reviewed to achieve Featured status.

The article-nomination process is not a way to showcase your favorite articles, but rather articles that are of high quality. Articles placed on this page will be extensively reviewed by experienced editors, including the presiding Inquisitorius review panel. The nomination process will require the article nominator to respond to objections and improve the article until the requisite number of users supports the nomination.

In undertaking a nomination on this page, the nominator is taking responsibility for their nominated article. This means they need to thoroughly read the following instructions, implement them into their nominated article, and respond to given objections. Nominators are encouraged to ask more experienced editors for guidance and assistance, but self-sufficiency is a requirement of the article-nomination process. It is not inherently the job of reviewers to rewrite elements of an article, but rather to guide nominators to be able to fix issues themselves.

Your nomination is your responsibility. Nominations that severely neglect the following rules or otherwise fall idle after two weeks will be subject to immediate removal.

READ THIS FIRST!

A Featured article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, with a neutral point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …be stable during and following the review process. This means the article does not change significantly from day to day with new content and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism or other administrative edits, such as page protection.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article is preferred but not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section or subsection.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …provide an introduction that gives a good summary of the topic.
  13. …be at least 1000 words long. This word total counts the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, but not captions, quotes, headers, etc. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
  14. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.
  15. …be nominated by a user who has promoted at least one article to Good article status. Exceptions can be made for a Good article nomination that, due to objections post-nomination, has gone over the Good article word limit, so long as the number of words added during the Good article nomination process is 250 or fewer.

How to nominate:

  1. Select an article you feel is worthy of Featured status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{FAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Featured article status previously, you will need to specify the number of the nomination as a parameter (e.g. {{FAnom|second}}).
  3. Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Other users will object to the nomination with issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
  7. The nominator should then adjust the article until the objections are satisfied. The objector is responsible for striking their objection when it has been addressed, not the nominator. Additionally, reviewers will often copy-edit the article themselves as desired to fix any issues.
  8. Following their review, other users will vote to support the nomination. Users may not vote on their own nomination.
  9. Each user (except for members of the Inquisitorius) shall be limited to four active Featured article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations will be subject to immediate removal.
  10. Users must successfully complete one Featured article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the FAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful FA nominations before they can have three, and three successful FA nominations before they can have four.

How to review:

  1. To review an article, users should read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. The article should be reviewed with the criteria listed above, and any issues should be placed under the Object section of the article's nomination page. Objections should be clearly explained, and detail how the article can be improved.
  3. Objections should then be addressed by the nominator. Once the objector is satisfied, they should strike their objection. The nominator should not strike reviewers' objections for them.
  4. Once a reviewer is satisfied with the article, they can vote to support it. Please note that in order to support a nomination, you must have 50 mainspace edits.

Result:

  1. If a nomination has been active for over two days and has no active objections, it may pass with a total of either five Inquisitorius votes, four Inquisitorius and two user votes, or three Inquisitorius and four user votes.
  2. Once the nomination is successful, the article will be considered a "Featured article." As such, an Inquisitorius member will archive the nomination using JocastaBot in Wookieepedia's Discord server and place the article on the Featured articles page. Only members of the Inquisitorius are allowed to perform these archiving tasks.
All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to immediate removal by Inquisitorius vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.


Featured article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Tierny

(2 Inqs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Fun to see ambitious collabs, well done both of you! Wok142 (talk) 06:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote OOM 224 (he/him/they) 14:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Remaining objections handled via Discord. This is quite a triumph! Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 03:57, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Object

Fred strikes back
  • "Once Ryvora and the colleagues she had been intending to meet—Yeager, Xiono, and CB-23—Tierny confronted her about the betrayal." There should be a verb somewhere in the first clause of this sentence. Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 23:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Zed
  • Could the image caption in the "Dantooine skirmish and revisiting Aeos Prime" section be reworded to make it clear that the pictured Resistance briefing is different to the briefing that Tierny is referred to as attending?
    • Was a case of accidental overuploading of an image with the same name, have fixed that now Lewisr (talk) 06:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
  • In the BTS: "Sean and Ace pilot Torra Doza's actor agreed with the sentiment," I think the actual name of Doza's actor should be included here. (would just add it myself, but don't have the source so wasn't sure if there was a reason behind it) Zed42 (talk) 05:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
    • Fair; added, and it is sourceable to the same.—spookywillowwtalk 06:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Should this card from Hotshots and Aces II Reinforcements Pack be detailed (that she used a Xi-class shuttle at one point) somewhere? Zed42 Wolfpack emblem (talk) 00:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Tucked into BtS after conferring with Lew. It—I do agree—would normally go in Biography somewhere if it were plausible, but in this case it isn't really since we see both ships she comes/goes in and she does not depart between due to the platform being underwater.—spookywillowwtalk 21:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
OOM
  • I think "Protégée" shouldn't be capitalised in the infobox, since it's not a proper noun.
    • Decapitalised Lewisr (talk) 23:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Missing Mediacat. The references section could probably use a scroll box as well. OOM 224 (he/him) 15:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
    • Added both in Lewisr (talk) 23:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Would be good if "Meeting a pilot" could establish that Venisa was in an X-wing with her droid when she's first mentioned.
  • "As the agent looked on, CB-23 was then electrocuted in an attempt to" — who electrocuted CB?
  • "with the latter commander ordering their vessel to set course for the world" — not clear as to whether this is Pyre or Galek. OOM 224 (he/him/they) 21:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
CC-8
Wok
  • In the intro, the sentence "Tierny, Commander Pyre, and Ryvora fled the Colossus before its jump to hyperspace, boarding the Resurgent-class Star Destroyer Thunderer and accepting Ryvora as a First Order cadet" - I think it would be better to say "boarding the Resurgent-class Star Destroyer Thunderer, where Ryvora was accepted as a First Order cadet" so it doesn't read as the verb "accepting" referring to Ryvora accepting herself as a cadet.
  • Last sentence of Arrival on the platform, I think it would be most clear to re-word it as "Tierny went to investigate, leaving Ryvora in the lounge guarded by two stormtroopers." That way it doesn't potentially read as the stormtroopers doing the investigating.
  • In Fleeing the station, instead of saying "offworld back to base," I feel like saying both is unnecessary and either one would suffice - what do you think? Wok142 (talk) 05:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  • In Onboarding a new cadet, I feel as though the sentence "Tierny watched the continued space battle from the Thunderer's bridge" could do without the word continued. Wok142 (talk) 02:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
  • In Dealing with treachery, the part "She then ordered nearby to fall back" seems to be missing a word. Maybe "ordered those nearby"?
    • Was meant to be troopers; tucked that in.—spookywillowwtalk 04:47, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Also in that section, the "whom she began pursuing" part feels unnecessary due to the adequate description in the next sentence. If you wanted to leave that in, I would suggest reorganizing that part of the sentence to be "she pulled out her blasters and began shooting at Xiono and Yeager as she pursued them."
  • In Skirmishing in hyperspace, I think you should use a word other then "dogfighting" as I believe that is reserved for aerial aircraft combat (or actual dogs of course).
  • In Death and defeat, I would change "hoping" in that first sentence to read "who had hoped" just to be clear about the subject.
  • Do you need to contextualize Liam McIntyre further in the bts or is just saying "actor" enough? I'm not really sure, I just wanted to bring it up since Myrna Velasco had the specific context of which character was voiced. Wok142 (talk) 04:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Slid in; I don't mind it here, though worth tangentially noting that it's usually up to nominator preference in terms of precedent.—spookywillowwtalk 04:47, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
      • Cool yea I was mostly just curious if there were rules around that. Wok142 (talk) 06:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Mindoku

  • Nominated by: DarthSkyll (talk) 20:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1131 words (161 introduction, 930 body, 40 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THR

(3 Inqs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 17:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Object

Thrawn
  • In the body you mention he was "living on" Jedha in 382 BBY, which is not the same as it being his homeworld, as mentioned in the infobox. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 02:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Lew
  • (Review note) Welcome to the FAN! Glad to see you here. Lewisr (talk) 04:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • The intro could use a bit of expansion Lewisr (talk) 04:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Jedha as his homeworld is currently only mentioned in the infobox Lewisr (talk) 04:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • There's a few duplicate links that need to be removed Lewisr (talk) 04:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Per the layout guide, the P&T section should come before the powers & abilities ones Lewisr (talk) 04:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the information, I expanded the intro, moved the P&T section, removed a few links (I hope I didn't miss one) and I added that Mindoku was living on Jedha to the intro and the body. DarthSkyll (talk) 23:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
      • The mention of him living on Jedha should be in the biography. I think the intro is still a bit short and could do with further expanding, summarising his role in the story Lewisr (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
        • I added that he lived on Jedha to the biography and expanded the intro. DarthSkyll (talk) 15:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
          • I still think it needs further, probably another paragraph at least Lewisr (talk) 04:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
            • I expanded the intro and split it in two paragraphs. DarthSkyll (talk) 12:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Jedha needs context in the intro Lewisr (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Panther
  • (Reviewing note) Careful about contractions, we do not use them for formal writing
  • Intro could use more context for the Brotherhood of the Ninth Door.
  • Each section of the history only has one paragraph but the paragraphs of the second two sections are very large. Should probably split the paragraphs in some way and maybe adjust the sectioning to spread the information more evenly.
  • If you keep it in three sections, it could probably use another image, perhaps one of Kradon.
  • I think you can get a better/more specific date note since the short story seems to be set during the attack on the peace summit, current one only says "around 382 BBY." With this, you can probably combine the peace summit note into the date one Panther436 (talk) 02:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
    • I will be more careful not to use contractions in future edits.
    • I expanded the intro.
    • I split the two sections into two paragraphs and added an image of Kradon.
    • I combined the two date notes. DarthSkyll (talk) 10:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
  • (Reviewing note) Just a heads-up because I saw it a few times, when referring to the Force, the 'F' should always be capitalized even when you're using hyphenated words like Force-sensitive.
  • The second sentence of the Powers and abilities section seems redundant to the first, section should be reworked Panther436 (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
    • I reworded the sentence in the Powers and abilities section. DarthSkyll (talk) 22:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
spookly
  • We don't really do one paragraph sections; the first two Biography ones should be merged to make for a three paragraph one.
  • Similar to the objection left here (which was summarily handed like this, to give an idea of what I'm asking for, there's a lot of play-by-play direct recounting of dialogue throughout. This should be evened out a bit to focus on actions a bit more than the exact words.
  • "was a kind person"—this would need to specify who saw him as kind, or be trimmed out per WP:NPOV. Imo, just saying he didn't wish to harm innocents gets the point across without the potential bias sneaking in.
  • I do think the first sentence of the first sentence could be split in two. It's running into a bit of comma collision with the three , up front; could have he lived there during the HR, then afterward establish everything else.
  • Tying on to the above point, it would be better to establish that he'd learned that Force skill he uses before the 382 BBY events introduction, as he must have known how to do that chronologically before the time of the story.
  • Seems like there's some missing image caption punctuation on the first and third images. It would also be best if the second image caption was tied in to mention Mindoku.
  • In terms of article readability, also going to request a synonym be used for "insouciantly"; having chatted with another Inq, while it is a valid usage of the word, it isn't the best for comprehension for most article readers due to being not used very much.
  • Is the story being Phase II directly sourceable to the story itself? (was eyeing Maeve Cuilinn, since that story of the same general P2 set does not). It generally is also precedent to specify THR as a multimedia project.
  • The P2 stories and such all got reprinted in a collection. Per the story's main page as well, seems it was also reprinted in a magazine issue; for Appearances.—spookywillowwtalk 01:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
    • I don't really get your first point.
      • First two subsections, under modern standard, have to be merged into one subsection. Status articles go for 2-3 paragraphs subsections whenever possible, and not above or below unless there's a really strong reason for. In this case; there's really no reason they would not be: it'll work quite well in length as a three paragraph subsection merged.—spookywillowwtalk 04:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Today I don't have time for the second point, I'll change it tomorrow.
    • Point 3-6 are taken care of.
    • I changed "insouciantly" with "carefreely", is that a good word?
    • The story being Phase II is mentioned in the magazine, not the story itself, but it beeing a multimedia project is not mentioned in the magazine. Sould I search for a StarWars.com source for both the story being Phase II and THR beeing multimedia or just the multimedia point?
    • I don't get the last point, I've never seen a collection or the official magazine beeing listed as an appearance. DarthSkyll (talk) 09:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
      • Per here and until overturned by CT (maybe will or won't be, unsure); all reprints of material—particularly Insider—do have to be listed, as it is a published piece of material that includes the source. It's licensed in that it's a separate piece of physical media (release date, etc.) and it's current standard to list them (Spamel); until/if the community decides on some sort of (reprinted in X) tag instead via Cade after it passes vote. There's also at least a few dozen Legends FAs that do this for any reprints of roleplaying game material or such that got re-released.—spookywillowwtalk 04:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
        • I changed some of the dialogue parts DarthSkyll (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
          • Hmm. Not quite what I'd meant—more referring to the heavy direct recounting of dialogue and focus on words instead of actions. Went ahead and fixed the rest of it in a copy-edit alongside some other issues.—spookywillowwtalk 17:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Tommy
  • Excellent work for your first FAN! Just a couple of small things, first, does the source explicitly say the puddle lit up with fire? If not, the pipelink should be removed.
  • In the P&T quote, does the source say "No, And I'm sorry."? Surely that "And" should be uncapitalised.
  • Likewise is "Don't you have one of those laser swords, or something" correct verbatim? Because that is grammatically incorrect, it shouldn't have a comma. It's fine if it's how the text writes it, and IMO that doesn't warrant a [Sic], but just wanted to check.
  • Is there a reason we're not using {{StoryCite}} for Star Wars Insider: The High Republic: Tales of Enlightenment? Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 18:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
    • The story doesn't explicitly use the word "puddle", but it explicitly says that the spilled ale lit up.
      • OK, I take that to mean the puddle lit up from the electricity, not that it was ignited as the pipelink currently suggests. I think the fire link should be removed. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 09:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
    • The "And" of the quote is capitalised in the short story. But the quote is spit in two by a sentence: "'No,' admitted Piralli. He felt his cheeks flush with embarrassment. 'And I’m sorry.'" Should I uncapitalise it?
      • We should be using a full stop (period) instead of a comma, since a full stop is used in a removed prose: "No. And I'm sorry." Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 09:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
    • The comma is present in the short story.
    • No there is no reason why I didn't use {{StoryCite}}, I changed it. DarthSkyll (talk) 15:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
  • (Reviewing note): Thanks for replying to these. Usually, we have responses to objections directly below the objection itself. Then on the next line, the next objection, and the next response, and so on. For example, see here. That just makes seeing what objections have been responded to a bit clearer, rather than having all the replies at the bottom. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 09:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • I'd remove the repeated section of the quote from the Personality and traits. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
    • I don't really understand what you mean, sorry. DarthSkyll (talk) 15:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
      • The last two lines of the Personality and Traits quote are the same as the quote from the "A plan to free Enlightenment" subsection above it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
        • I totally overlooked that, I changed it. DarthSkyll (talk) 16:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Sana
  • Since the story has been printed in multiple things, BTS should state "first published in…" Sanathestarr (talk) 22:43, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Comet
  • Is there any indication that he's a skilled fighter with his electrostaff? He doesn't really use it in combat, he just stabs a puddle, which doesn't seem like it takes much skill. CometSmudge (talk) 16:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Phase connector

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 03:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: THERE ARE DAYS AND THERE ARE DAYS.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1217 words (214 introduction, 974 body, 29 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:RESISTANCE

(3 Inqs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote Such a relatable quote Lewisr (talk) 21:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 07:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 05:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • "The mechanic began to panic and felt that the freighter needed not to depart the Colossus." - I don't really know what this sentence is trying to say. Is Kaz just saying his feelings out loud here? The latter part of the sentence is also quite awkwardly worded, could we just say "and felt that the freighter should not depart the Colossus"? Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 20:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
    • I see what you mean; tweaked it slightly differently, if that works?—spookywillowwtalk 02:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Rothana

(3 Inqs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

UberSoldat93 Din Djarin's clan (talk) 15:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC) (Vote struck per policy: Banned user -- —spookywillowwtalk 00:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC))
  1. Wok142 (talk) 01:51, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 14:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 02:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 22:11, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Object

ThrawnChiss7
  • "From 31 ABY" sounds off to me; I think that "in" would be a better choice of word. What do you think? ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 22:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
    • I'm trying to convey a time range, so "from" makes more sense to me.
  • The mention in Chronicles of the Jedi can surely be used as a quote in the "corporate politics" section, and maybe deserves a mention in the body. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 22:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
    • The Chronicles mention isn't a quote from a character as far as I know, so can't be used in {{Quote}}. I also think that the sheltering thing is more relevant to the walker and RHE than the planet, which is why I've omitted that info. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 14:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
      • I don't have Chronicles, but Roland Quarry treats it as a quote from Harli Cogra in their in-universe Chronicles of the Jedi. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 16:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
        • I've looked it over a bit but to be completely honest, the text in which the walker is mentioned comes across a bit non-fictional for me to want in the article, even if that in itself is technically IU writing. I also think that it's not that relevant to the article's body as it's just the walker being noted. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 02:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
          • Eh, I dunno. I think it would be better to use for the quote and mention it in the body as because it is an IU writing, but I don't have super strong feelings about it. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 03:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
  • It's also mentioned in book by Poe Dameron, in RHE's name with regards to the LAAT/i and the AT-TE. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 23:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
    • Currently links to a Legends page. UberSoldat93 Din Djarin's clan (talk) 13:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
      • The link has been fixed, ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 13:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
        • Just looked at the info for this one too, and I'd say it's also not relevant to the body as it's just the fact RHE produced the two being noted and nothing specific to the planet Rothana itself. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 15:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Build the Millennium Falcon Star Wars: Build the Millennium Falcon 74 (Starship Fact File: Terrapin-class Bulk Tanker) states of the Terrapin-class: "Marrying the toughness and durability of Rothana's ground vehicles, with the ingenious design cues of the likes of Desando Dynamics' successful heavy transport series, the new transport/walker hybrid certainly did fulfil those promises." I'm pretty sure this is referring to the corporation, but it does just use "Rothana", so I'll leave it up to you on how you want to phrase it. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 12:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Sorry for the delay. Looking through this, the info itself looks more relevant to the company in my opinion, but it's otherwise chill being in the sources. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 10:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Imp
  • Seems like the Galactic Republic planets category is missing.
  • Can some of the infobox fields be populated to support the Ice planets category and reflect the physical description info that's present in the Description section? Imperators II(Talk) 09:41, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Uber
Wok
  • Can you give more context to the sentence "which could profit from Rothana's rich soil" in Corporate politics? Wok142 (talk) 04:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
  • In the intro, you use "Around 31 BBY" to describe the time period where RDE built Republic ships, but in the Building for an army section, you reference this time period with 32 BBY. I think it would make the most sense to use the same number in both instances to be the most clear to readers. Wok142 (talk) 04:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Note: I was a little braver with the copy-edits this time, so you can inspect that here and let me know about anything you'd prefer to hash out. Wok142 (talk) 04:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
spookly
  • To echo ThrawnChiss's point above, after consulting with some other folk, the Chronicles of the Jedi quote tbf does have to be included as the quote for that section (unless there is another quote for that section that would trump it); and the book itself's publication should be documented IU. We have a good 25-30 or so that treat it as such and we have the dating, author, and preferred formatting set up pretty decently so it shouldn't be more than a copy paste in. The primary reasoning for this (to also be tinkered around with) is that everything sent to Valo (a middle-of-nowhere place) is from its origin planet, so [Rothana] sent those Rothana walkers there, which was then documented in the IU book.—spookywillowwtalk 01:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  • The reference for 'arctic' between the infobox and Description should be made consistent.
  • Fauna is generally mentioned in Description instead of Inhabitants if a creature and non-sentient; Pijal comes to mind offhand, though is also done most other places too from eyeing Legends FAs. It seems that in Inhabitants, the whelmer is being described as a creature—if that is the case, it should be moved up. Or, if a species proper, then the other aspects altered to match.—spookywillowwtalk 18:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
    • That practice doesn't make sense to me. Any species is an inhabitant if it's from there. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 14:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
      • The precedent is overwhelmingly to have Description describe the aspects of the world not originating with the activities of sentient beings, e.g. its location, geology, geography, and fauna and flora, and in the Inhabitants describe the sentient residents of the world. And this is explicitly supported by the Layout Guide as well. Imperators II(Talk) 15:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Trymant IV

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 02:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC) Lewisr (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Trymant, my child. Writing this in a week-long binge session was hella fun.—spookywillowwtalk Always a pleasure to be collabing on these big pages, especially THR! Lewisr (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Word count at nomination time: 4521 words (391 introduction, 3777 body, 353 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THRWP:ASTWP:COMICSWP:NOVELS

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Superb work on this. Would love to see more. UberSoldat93 Din Djarin's clan (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC) (Vote struck per policy: Banned user -- —spookywillowwtalk 17:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC))

Object

ThrawnChiss7
  • I'm pretty sure that only the first use of 232 BBY should be linked in the infobox. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 02:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
    • Removed the other links Lewisr (talk) 02:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Uber
  • If I recall correctly, the Legacy Run wasn't exactly "attacked," it was a collision planned by Ro. UberSoldat93 Din Djarin's clan (talk) 19:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
    • Slightly tweaked, does that work? Didn't need an extra cite since Timelines mentions that Ro takes credit for the Disaster Lewisr (talk) 04:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Precedent is to note what the planet looked like from orbit (e.g. Trigalis, Chorin). UberSoldat93 Din Djarin's clan (talk) 07:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
  • "Jedi Knight Vernestra Rwoh reviewed the files of the Trymant IV disaster. Rwoh felt that the attack in the Trymant system did not match the marauders' standard raid patterns, similar to the ones she had encountered on Wevo" This is a little confusing to follow. Are the patterns on Wevo similar to the ones on Trymant?
  • I'm noticing a lot of play-by-play and somewhat-irrelevant details throughout the article. Take, for example, the section "Homesick blues," much of it goes into detail about character interactions that 1.) do not take place on Trymant 2.) do not fall under the general scope of a planet article and 3.) don't even mention Trymant to begin with. Generally speaking, character thoughts and feelings aren't really relevant to a planet's history if they don't directly concern it to begin with. UberSoldat93 Din Djarin's clan (talk) 11:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
    • Gave it a decent haircut; I think most of the rest can be justified in some form though, Trymant itself is mentioned a lot narratively, and most points make the later aspects of the article seem a bit more contextualized.—spookywillowwtalk 03:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
  • You now have two consecutive images aligned to the same side (after "Impending doom"). I honestly think there should only be one image under "Search for safety." UberSoldat93 Din Djarin's clan (talk) 10:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • Also a sidenote that yes, the infobox is cursed. But combinably with RTCT content and the author stating it was intentional that the planet was super dead, it's safe to say that all (aboveground) brushery and trees were zapped.—spookywillowwtalk 02:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
  • Continue from "Idyllic refuge." UberSoldat93 Din Djarin's clan (talk) 19:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)


Norath Kev

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 22:43, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Put this on the to-write list just under a year ago today, only fitting it sees fruition around now.
  • Word count at nomination time: 4415 words (441 introduction, 3727 body, 247 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:RESISTANCEWP:GE

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

ThrawnChiss
  • (This would normally be a sofixit, but given it's in a quote, I figured I'd bring it up here) "We'll then rendezous with the others." this should either be fixed or [sic]. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 02:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Heinz Darthenshmirtz

  • Nominated by: - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 04:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
    "What are you supposed to be, some kind of Wookieepedia editor?"
    *puts on hat*
    "PERRY THE WOOKIEEPEDIA EDITOR?!"
  • Word count at nomination time: 2081 words (137 introduction, 1743 body, 201 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Ambition

(2 Inqs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote Funnily enough re: below didn't really have anything else to fix after that so…ta-da, free vote.—spookywillowwtalk 01:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
  2. This nom was unexpected…and by unexpected I mean COMPLETELY EXPECTED!! Panther436 RedNihilEye (talk) 18:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 05:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Object

ThrawnChiss
CC-8
  • Rogue One's full release date can't be sourced to the film itself, but also only the year is necessary, and that can be sourced to the film. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 03:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Changed. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 17:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Panther
  • (Review note) Always happy to see PnF noms!
  • Think him implementing the Anti-Magnet-Antennae V2.0 on the Normtrooper-inator should be included
    • Added. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 20:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
      • With this I think it can be mentioned in the history section that he disabled Perry's wrist magnet Panther436 RedNihilEye (talk) 01:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
        • Added. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 22:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Rather than Darthenshmirtz warning Perry about the Sith inator, I think the context should be expanded to clarify that Perry confronted Darthenshmirtz about his new project, but he refused to admit to it or reveal it until Perry defeated him
    • Revised. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Don't think both of those images fit in the second section, suggest removing one
    • Moved the Vader one to the P&T. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
  • I know what you mean but "the Force surrounds and binds everything" isn't actually a metaphor, bit at the end of paragraph 3 should be reworded
    • Changed from "metaphor" to "saying." - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Final bio section should be split or resectioned, we try to keep sections to 2-3 paragraphs
    • Split into new section. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
  • If that quote is going to lead the P&t I think it should maybe include some commentary on Darthenshmirtz's cockiness or something akin to that, potentially including when he taunted Perry with the "I'd like to see you try that again" during their fight
    • Added. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
  • The Sith-inator, Normtrooper-inator, Doof Star, and the Darthenshmirtz Sith Inc. should all be mentioned in the Equipment section
    • Added. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Bts stuff:
    • There are some cut story elements relating to Darthenshmirtz that I'd like to see included, see the bts for Perry (Platypus)
      • Do you have a source for these so I can check for them? - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
    • I feel like the story of the design for Darthenshmirtz coming from a doodle Povenmire did when Disney bought Lucasfilm that spawned the whole special etc. etc. should be included at least briefly as well. Would make a fun bts image too. I believe Povenmire tweeted about it but I know he told the whole story on TikTok as well. Panther436 (talk) 01:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
      • I'll see if I can find the tweet or another source, but if you have it on hand please let me know. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
    • With all this stuff I think you could put one of Povenmire's tidbits as a Bts quote Panther436 (talk) 02:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
      • Added. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Phineas and Ferb and a lot of its characters have wikipedia pages, which I think would be better to link to over the PnF wiki pages Panther436 RedNihilEye (talk) 01:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
      • I'm not sure when it was added, but the Wikipedia page for Doof appears to already be listed above the P&F wiki links for both Doof and Darth. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 22:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
        • I meant for the Wikipedia pages to be pipelinked in the Bts, I just went ahead and changed this Panther436 RedNihilEye (talk) 18:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  • The Equipment section could use a quote, suggest maybe the "what idiot would design that with a self-destruct button" line or the flashlight line or whatever you think fits Panther436 (talk) 02:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Added. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 20:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
  • The intro makes it seem like Doof deliberately turned Ferb into a Sith, and I think that bit should focus more on the end goal of the sith-inator being to turn Doof into a Sith.
    • Rephrased to make it clear Ferb was accidental and made it more clear him becoming a Sith was his actual goal. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
      • I didn't know to to explain this so I copy-edited it more, feel free to adjust to your liking Panther436 RedNihilEye (talk) 18:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  • The sentence about him rehearsing the musical number at the beginning of the bio seems a little overkill, I think you can just call the performance "rehearsed" when you bring it up later on.
    • There is precedent to mention things earlier in the bio section if they are stated to have happened at some point rather than simply alongside their mention. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 20:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
      • Right, which makes sense for things like him buying the condo on Alderaan. But when you can just say "Darthenshmirtz performed a *rehearsed* musical number" the extra sentence becomes distracting and unnecessarily detailed, especially when we have no real frame of reference for when this rehearsal happened and that extra sentence could be at the wrong place in the history section chronologically. Panther436 RedNihilEye (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
        • Fair enough, adjusted. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
  • This sort of goes along with the above objection, but I think the article, mainly the history section, is too play-by-play. I struggle a lot with this too, but it's is primarily because there are a lot of instances of dialogue being directly recounted and every step of an overall action being detailed. I think some of it can be condensed and made into more of a summary, although the overall info that's there already can remain. I can elaborate more if you'd like, I know this isn't the easiest to address. Panther436 RedNihilEye (talk) 01:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
spookly
  • Unless substantiated by a SW creator or other OOU source, the Rogue One section violates the site stance on original research (ie synthesis of comparisons drawn).
    • Removed; don't actually recall who added it but it wasn't me. I didn't realize it counted as original research, though. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 01:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
  • The {{1stm}} (the sw.com article) isn't documented in the BtS.
    • Fixed. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 01:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
  • I'm also not seeing a clear line stating that Phineas and Ferb: Star Wars was where his last name was revealed (which should also be clarified by further noting that he was only named by last name in Agent P: Rebel Spy, which can be done in a variety of ways, as is usually done with characters that have it revealed in steps.—spookywillowwtalk 00:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
    • So it was a bit wonkier even; his last name was revealed in Rebel Spy first, and his first name was revealed in the special. But even weirder, before either of these the SW.com article referred to him as "Darth Enshmirtz." Irregardless, the BTS section has been revised to account for this. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 01:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Kozmo Sundrel IV

  • Nominated by: - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 04:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Kozmo didn't get the memo that you're supposed to be nice to friends.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1457 words (165 introduction, 1252 body, 40 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject The High Republic

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 19:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Object

spookly
  • 2nd paragraph's BBY also needs to be tied to the date reference already present.
    • Fixed. Not sure how I missed that. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Top subsection is five paragraphs—though it is all one scene, the bottom two can still form their own section quite cleanly, since the preferred section length for modern FANs is 2-3 paragraphs.
    • Split. Will add quote after I get off work. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
      • Added quote. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 04:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
  • From what I recall of the story, it's established that Axel knew he often wore that medallion of his. It'd then make sense if Kozmo often wearing it was presented in the top paragraph of the biography rather than later on for chronology.
    • Moved. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
  • "Like the coif, Greylark regarded Sundrel's medallion as ridiculous."—Axel's opinion can be worked into the Biography if necessary, but shouldn't be in the Equipment since that's more just for documenting what he owned.
    • Moved. Kept Axel's opinion on the coif in P&T since the coif isn't brought up elsewhere in the body. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
      • My point rather was that the coif opinion should be moved to the P&T or the Biography—as it's currently in Equipment, but isn't equipment.—spookywillowwtalk 04:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
        • Added a mention of the coif to the biography and moved Axel's opinion of it to there. Didn't think it'd fit in the P&T since Axel's opinion of the coif isn't part of Kozmo's personality, but Axel's. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 04:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
  • The body technically doesn't specify that he is male anywhere (explicitly), leaving it infobox-exclusive.
    • Added to P&T. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
  • "Sundrel got back up and commented that his father should make a blaster-proof prototype of the medallion."—if this is right, should Sundrel's father have a page to be worked into this and the infobox?
    • Added link and made page. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
  • From story: "Kozmo said in his regal, clipped Basic."—while we don't always require listing what languages folk speak, there is precedent for it. In this case, I think it'd be warranted to say he spoke Basic (especially given we don't know what species he is) and also that he talked in a regal tone in the PT.
    • Added. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Though the biography glancingly contexualizes Elecia as a leader, it'd be better to tuck that she was a woman/human or something else in there as context since the work supports both, just so it follows the standard [context] [person] layout.—spookywillowwtalk 19:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
    • Added context as "human criminal." - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
  • I'm seeing some decapitalized usage of lord in the story; is there a particular reason it's capitalized in the intro? (similar to how we treat capitalization of prince/princess etc.)
    • Fixed. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Technically, every Greylark mention past where Lexxir is linked would need to either be "young Greylark" or Axel's first name.—spookywillowwtalk 04:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Went through and adjusted. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 21:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
  • I'm spying a "shouldn't" and also some more-common missing links like time. I'll make a pass through on my final copy-edit but would like if another general copy-edit run was made through the article before I do so to get most of it.
    • Fixed. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 06:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
  • With the subsection split now, it would be optimal if every section had an image. Axel has another image that could be used, or the current Axel image could be used in the second section to allow for one of Kyong (because Sundrel's family supported her) or Coruscant to be placed. Entirely preference for this last point so long as each section gets one at least, but it is somewhat worth noting that the other Axel image from Character Encyclopedia depicts him not carrying a lightsaber, which may be more time-accurate at this junction.
    • Added image of Kyong and moved Axel's. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 06:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
      • Replying for bot timer's sake to reset about the HRCE image replacement still outstanding.—spookywillowwtalk 19:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
        • Image replaced. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 19:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Intro: "…Reena University around 396 BBY."—the body has 'by around 396 BBY' and the intro has only 'around 396 BBY.' Unless he was only a student in that year, should be made consistent with the 'by.'
    • Fixed. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 06:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Intro: "regularly accompanied…"—I'm not sure the 'regularly' bit is reflected clearly in the History, or at least not outright. It should be slipped in there somewhere though just for good measure, as at the moment it only implies that his family overall spent time with the Greylarks as a whole, and then they spent the festival day together.
    • Added (revised the sentence(s) I added it to as well). - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 06:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
  • History: "Their relationship improved somewhat, they departed for the night." sentence fragment, grammatically.
    • It's meant to be "Their relationship [having] improved somewhat, they departed for the night," but I understand why it sounds/reads confusing. I've added the "having" into the sentence explicitly to make it more clear. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 06:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Similar to Hamato there's a bit of over-recounting of specific dialogue lines that can be further prosified (while not cutting content, just rearrangement). Happy to help with that if need be, but would appreciate a pass being made for it.—spookywillowwtalk 02:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
    • I've revised a few places I felt could be made more brief or didn't require some of the additional dialogue-based context. Though I'm sure I've missed a few areas. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 06:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
      • Made a few smaller adjustments, that did get most of it though.—spookywillowwtalk 21:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Lew
  • The story mentions he has deep brown eys "We can go," Kozmo said, and there was something like pity in his deep brown eyes. "We came, we saw—" Lewisr (talk) 20:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Added. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
  • As per the above, I'm wondering if that about Kozmo having pity for Axel after suggesting they could leave after seeing Lexxir should be noted maybe in the PT Lewisr (talk) 20:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Added. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Beesar Tal-Apurna

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 04:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: There's several reasons I wrote this one. Firstly, to do a matching set with Teemank. Secondly, because the comic had cool art. Thirdly...I like seeing non-Jedi willing to fight the Nihil. Makes the conflict seem more grounded and real.
  • Word count at nomination time: 2107 words (224 introduction, 1654 body, 229 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:COMICSWP:WOMENWP:PRIDEWP:THR

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote I love Beesar so much, one highlight is when she's trying to use Zaygar's blaster Lewisr (talk) 03:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Object

ThrawnChiss
  • Wouldn't the starwars.com preview technically be a {{1stp}} and not a {{1stm}} because it was first indirectly mentioned by Older on Twitter? ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 02:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Tweaked the wording a bit on second thought to be clearer on the Tweet. Though in principle I do disagree; we don't treat non-SW.com/or most other previews for media as Sources proper, so anything that isn't in Sources isn't really a proper mention (direct or indirect). That's been a thing for quite some time, and the only limited exceptions are some other IU Twitter account stuff that's been done awhile back.—spookywillowwtalk 03:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
  • As Tal-Apurna is only pictured in the sw.com preview, a {{Po}} should be used. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 14:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
    • She's not only pictured though; she's one of the spies Imo'd by Caphtor and the investigator's conversation. Spoke to another Inq who indicated that an Imo + a Po constitutes a full mention when done in comics.—spookywillowwtalk 15:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Kassius Konstantine's Interdictor

  • Nominated by: Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 17:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I usually dislike "unnamed" ships but it felt rude to do Constrainer and not this one
  • Word count at nomination time: 1471 words (198 introduction, 1067 body, 206 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB, WP:REB

(3 Inqs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Wok142 (talk) 06:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 03:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Fan26 (Talk) 16:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Object

Wok142
  • In the second paragraph of Blockading Atollon, the sentence "Rebel Commander Jun Sato predicted that there would be no escape for the rebel fleet, upon realizing that the Empire was using Interdictor vessels." could be smoother. I propose reorganizing it this way (I also replaced "predicted" with "lamented" as I think that works better tonally): "Realizing that the Empire was using Interdictor vessels, rebel Commander Jun Sato lamented that there would be no escape for the rebel fleet." Wok142 (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
    • Yes I like that, added.
  • In the second sentence of the second paragraph of Defying Thrawn section, I would add "onboard" at the end of that sentence to say "leaving only himself and two rebel pilots onboard." Wok142 (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
  • One more thing. Can Sienar Fleet Systems be added as the manufacturer? The Interdictor-class Star Destroyer page includes that and so does another Interdictor, the Spectral. Wok142 (talk) 18:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
    • We have a precedent of not carrying manufacturer over to individual ships, since I believe we've seen multiple examples of this not being accurate (eg Sienar building ISDs, not Kuat). I haven't done this for any of my other individual ship status articles so I'm hesitant to do so here unless it's a decision from wider discussion. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 21:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
      • Sounds fair, I figured there might be a reason I wasn't aware of. Good to know! Wok142 (talk) 06:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • I get kinda confused thinking about when to use Template:Imo with ships with titles like this. I've created this file to show what each source refers to this ship as, just to confirm the current template usage is correct. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 17:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


Dathomirian/Legends

  • Nominated by: AmazinglyCool Nightsisters symbol - JFO (talk) 04:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Sold my soul to write up a Wookieepedia page about 20 years of retcons :P
  • Word count at nomination time: 3877 words (364 introduction, 1899 body, 1614 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:ALIENS, WP:NOVELS, WP:TCW

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 02:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Object

DFaceG
  • The intro effectively mentions the capability of growing hair being a sexually dimorphic trait twice, which is redundant. One should be removed. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 06:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Speaking of the sexually dimorphic traits, these would be a result of the different biological sexes of the species, not their gender. A transfem Dathomirian would likely naturally still have head horns and be unable to grow hair, for example. (I'm assuming you're aware of this, this is more me pointing out the language used to describe their sexual dimorphism) - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 06:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
    • I just looked over it again, can you let me know the specific spots where I used incorrect language? AmazinglyCool Nightsisters symbol - JFO (talk) 01:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
      • I'm specifically suggesting against using just "males" and "females" to refer to individuals with the sexually dimorphic traits. I don't think that terms like afab/amab exist in-universe but perhaps you could find a way to convey that the traits are attributed to individuals assigned those genders at birth rather than all individuals of those genders. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 19:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
ThrawnChiss7

Comments

  • Hi, congratulations, it's one of the most impressive work I have seen lately. Nevertheless, I would like to point something that raise concern to me. It's about the retcon of Gethzerion as a Dathomoirian. I don't have problem with such retcons usually but here it appears problematic for me. The old sources clearly indicate that Gethzerion is a member of the Djo family, a family of Humans... I think the authors of the Reader's Companion just forgot that point when they made the retcon. It's indeed possible to imagine that Augwynne Djo found a Zabrak at some point to have child with him... And therefore Gethzerion would be the only non-human of the family but this would be completely at odds with the spirit of the original novel. I'm curious to see the general opinion about that but, in my opinion, I really think we should assume that the retcon is a mistake. Best, Hk 47 (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Well it being at "odds with the spirit of the original novel" doesn't mean it's incorrect. As you pointed out, there is a way it can work without much issue so I think it's better to assume the retcon is fine and keep moving forward. AmazinglyCool Nightsisters symbol - JFO (talk) 01:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


Minos Cluster

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 19:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Towed from FCA through a bunch of THR updates. Delightfully fun.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1226 words (162 introduction, 740 body, 324 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THRWP:ASTWP:REBELSWP:NOVELSWP:COMICS

(2 Inqs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote Did a pre-nom review. ;) Very nice work! Imperators II(Talk) 21:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. Zed42 Wolfpack emblem (talk) 23:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 04:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Object

Comments

  • At some point whenever the OZ inevitably dissolves, it'll get a one-liner update stating such in the History. I don't really consider it unstable due to that though since it'd be super minor.—spookywillowwtalk 19:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)


Vernid

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 11:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1340 words (242 introduction, 1078 body, 20 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:NOVELS

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Wok142 (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Object

Wok
spookly
  • "Inhabitants on the planet included…"—given there's a couple sentences on the back end of Description only describing residents, shouldn't that be an Inhabitants section? I've seen ones with shorter.—spookywillowwtalk 06:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Is the inhabitants field not specifically for species that originated on the world? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 14:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
      • No, IU LG has native or resident species for anyone who lived there; though, for sentient species only, as all non-sentient/undefined go as fauna in Description. Grizmallt, Chorin, Pijal, and Atrisia/Legends seem to be good examples of humans having inhabited a planet and thus being deemed 'inhabitants' in the resultantly named section.—spookywillowwtalk 18:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
        • Fairs, done. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
          • Sorry to backtrack on this again but this is meant for the content in "Description" itself as noted in the objection for the few sentences, everything past "Inhabitants on the planet included…" in that section. It needs to be moved to an "Inhabitants" section above the "Locations" section per the IU LG sectioning requirements/SAs etc. above and then the resulting linking tweaks stemming from that. The infobox was correct as it was and I've moved that back.—spookywillowwtalk 03:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  • The CA mijura presents the beverage as decapitalized; Vernid presents it in the Description as capitalized. Whichever's correct should be made consistent with the other.—spookywillowwtalk 03:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Berrol's Donn/Legends

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 18:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1233 words (113 introduction, 727 body, 393 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST

(3 Inqs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 02:58, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 00:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Fan26 (Talk) 22:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Comet (clone trooper)

  • Nominated by: Wok142 (talk) 07:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: First FAN, wish me luck
  • Word count at nomination time: 1485 words (185 introduction, 1258 body, 42 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:TCW

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Braha
  • Kind of a preference on my end but I think it'd be good to slap some dates in the intro.
  • The Clone Wars gets more context in the intro than it does in the bio (same with detail on the Separatists' name). Can that be fixed please? Might be worth having that in the creation section.
  • Vanqor needs context in the intro. Zygerria and Lothal need context in the bio.
  • Might be worth introducing Oba Diah moon a lil better so that there's no confusion as to whether Oba Diah is the moon itself, like it's introduced in the intro.
    • All addressed. Wok142 (talk) 16:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
  • I get why height is translated to all clones from a single source but weight feels a lil more arbitrary since it's all depending on diet, activity etc. If that's a precedent I'm strongly against it as it seems way to assumptive. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 14:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
    • According to lew, this is precedent, but you raise some good points. I'm leaving it for now because it's precedent, but I would be down to potentially change that. Wok142 (talk) 16:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Can Nexus also get some context in the intro please? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 18:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Certainly. Wok142 (talk) 00:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Sacred firestone of King Skrawll

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 11:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1051 words (248 introduction, 738 body, 65 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:ENT, WP:COMICS

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 19:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Toos

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: One of a few film SAs pushed over the word limit by a LEGO Skywalker Saga update
  • Word count at nomination time: 1052 words (209 introduction, 607 body, 236 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Ambition

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Tomb of Miktrull

  • Nominated by: Marvacian Archivist (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1995 words (137 introduction, 1407 body, 451 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Anto Kreegyr

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 19:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Back to the Andor grind.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1411 words (238 introduction, 1048 body, 125 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:CIS

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Wok142 (talk) 23:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Object

Wok
  • Does Spellhaus technically need more context in the intro?
    • Should be fine, "on" technically tells you enough about it already (that it's a terrestrial astronomical object) if that's all you're working with, so I tend to leave it like that if it's the situation of an intro mention.
      • Ok that makes sense, should be fine then. Wok142 (talk) 23:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • If "slow and stupid ox" is the exact language, it should probably be in quotation marks.
    • I is not, see the top quote.
  • First sentence of the second paragraph of The ISB Plot, I think it should be rearranged to read as: ISB Supervisor Dedra Meero was particularly keen to use this information to her advantage, hoping to track down Rael, whom she only knew as a unknown individual that she called "Axis." In my opinion, "was particularly keen" is smoother than "particularly was keen" and adding in the "hoping" (you could also use "wanting" or another synonymous term) in the second segment would make the "to" in "to her advantage" so close to the "to" in "to track down," which in my opinion is a bit cluttered.
  • In the next sentence, I would advocate for "several other supervisors and attendants" as opposed to "some other supervisors and attendants." I feel it currently is a tad informal.
    • Both make sense, changed.
  • I think you'll want to combine the first two paragraphs of The ISB Plot into one, as the first one is only two sentences.
    • Five lines is enough to be a paragraph tbh, no matter how split into sentences it is. I'd rather have that than a overly chunky paragraph that would result from the two being combined.
      • All good. I thought there were guidelines against two sentence paragraphs until earlier today so that's why I mentioned it. It can be left as is. Wok142 (talk) 23:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Last sentence of this section, I think "Partagaz agreeing with this" would read smoother as "with Partagaz agreeing."
  • In Protecting a double agent, I think you should add "revealed" into the third sentence so it reads: "There, Jung told the spy about Meero's investigations on "Axis" and revealed that the ISB knew about the planned attack on Spellhaus"
  • I think it should be explicitly described that Luthen told Saw that he was letting Kreegyr go on their mission to die in both the intro and in Playing the long game.
  • I also think it should more explicit description is necessary for the fact that Kreegyr did not know that the Empire learned of their plan to attack Spellhaus. For example, in the intro, the last sentence of the first paragraph could be changed to say "Meanwhile, one of Kreegyr's pilots was captured by the Empire at a customs check and, unbeknownst to Kreegyr, gave up information on the Spellhaus attack in an interrogation. And at the end of The ISB Plot, you could note something like "The ISB's ploy meant that Kreegyr's cell were unaware that their plans had been discovered." Wok142 (talk) 21:58, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
spookly
  • Just really more of a cursory noticed/starting objection but in technicality there's clothing in the hologram to be equipment'd.—spookywillowwtalk 03:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Marda Ro's hunt

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Marda Ro's journal

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Tagge protoblade

  • Nominated by: Lewisr (talk) 04:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Finally getting this back up now after holding off after the last Aphra issues
  • Word count at nomination time: 1972 words (236 introduction, 1497 body, 239 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:COMICS

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Object

Thannus
  • I feel like the current infobox image doesn't lend itself much to showing the reader what the protoblade actually looks like. They can tell it's a gauntlet and that it has a yellow blade, but it's drawn in a manner that makes it appear blurry and obscures essentially all detail. I think the infobox would benefit from an image that would help readers better identify it. It doesn't have the blade ignited, but the image used in the Description section would be a good fit beyond that imo. The one under "Mutiny" might also work, this one has a detailed look at the gauntlet and has the blade ignited. - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 02:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Agreed, will look into the issues to see Lewisr (talk) 03:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
      • Does that work with you? Lewisr (talk) 04:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
        • Yep, thanks! - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
OOM
  • Pretty much just an aesthetic suggestion as well: I think featuring Domina's cover illustration linked here in the BTS would be superb, as opposed to the current Legends picture. OOM 224 (he/him/they) 20:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
    • Yeah I prefer that too, switched, thanks for the suggestion! Lewisr (talk) 03:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Gorin

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Feyn Vann

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 02:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: That full set of scientists gets closer and closer every day.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1213 words (176 introduction, 808 body, 229 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Ames Uravan

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 03:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Scientists! More! All of them. Also, this was my second GAN ever (and failed) from 2018 so it's nice to see how far its come.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1089 words (192 introduction, 771 body, 126 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms
Advertisement