- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Constrainer[]
- Nominated by: Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 11:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Yes, I'm back! Hopefully not too rusty, it's been a while since my Inq days. Glad to be able to nominate something from Rebels that isn't one of those ugly giraffe ISDs, I have a lot of nostalgia for this show.
- Date Archived: 04:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Final word count: 1393 words (193 introduction, 917 body, 283 behind the scenes)
- Word count at nomination time: 1394 words (194 introduction, 905 body, 295 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB, WP:REB
(4 Inqs/2 Users/6 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support[]
- Hope to see more. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hope to see you tow Tyrant back up. Sparklingly clean as always.—spookywillowwtalk 03:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Lewisr (talk) 04:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 02:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Zed42 (talk) 12:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Supreme Emperor Holocomm 04:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Object[]
Lew[]
- Review note: Welcome back, nice to see you nomming again! Lewisr (talk) 21:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Per the example of Vult Skerris, the Chimaera being an ISD-I class, and I guess that the other ships were of that class and took part in the battle overall, should be cited to another sourceLewisr (talk) 21:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)- Sorry to interject here, but that's not really necessary. For Vult Skerris, Thrawn: Alliances doesn't establish that the Chimaera was an ISD-I, yes, but in general ISD I can get duck tested based on the fact that they have a tractor beam targeting array, a feature that is found on on the Imperial I-class. ThrawnChiss7 Assembly Cupola 22:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah I'd agree with ThrawnChiss, previous noms I've done haven't had citations for other ships' classes. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 13:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The four authors for Battles that Changed the Galaxy can be removed, as we don't really list when there are more than twoLewisr (talk) 21:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Uber[]
Good to have you back! Here are things I noticed, starting with Atollon's context. It's currently sourced to Nexus of Power, which I don't think actually mention Atollon to begin with.- Ah, I meant to check that myself but I must've forgot. That teaches me for trusting another article. Now sourced to Dawn of Rebellion which I have confirmed supplies that info.
A recent practice is to avoid assuming the ISD model based solely on the tower alone, since we have seen ISDs breaking this standard. It could use some more discussion, but for now we refrain from assuming.Similarly, the Chimaera being an ISD I needs another source (Starships and Speeders supports this).UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)- I realize this objection was made above, but I think we should use hard sources where possible. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK, if that's the direction we're going in I'm fine with that. I've added that suggestion for Chimaera, thanks, and just said the rest of them are ISDs, which I assume is fine to just duck test.
- Also, a couple of things about your copy-edit. First off, I'm quite confused about the use of Template:Video. If it isn't used for those sources, what is it for? You added it to Tector-class so I assume that case is correct, but I can't think of the difference that article and this. Also, the list of Imperial vessels is still a complex list, as commas are used for reasons other than separating listed items. As such, the commas separating listed items do need to be replaced by semi-colons. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 13:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- See, for a trailer, the template doesn't make sense since everything in it is being "previewed," in my opinion, hence why I removed that template. Since the Tector is not the focus of the Rebels Recon video, I placed it there. I personally treat it on a case-by-case basis, but I definitely think that template doesn't work for trailers. As for the comma thing, I didn't know about that rule, thanks. UberSoldat93 (talk) 14:10, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- I realize this objection was made above, but I think we should use hard sources where possible. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Fred strikes back[]
This is a rarity, but I believe the article is actually overillustrated. Personally, I think the Sabine image can be removed and then the other realigned.Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 19:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Zed[]
The infobox references Interdictor line straight to Timelines, but the Description references that specific detail to Falcon. If that's the case, then the infobox ref should be updated to match.Zed42 (talk) 07:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Comments[]
- I'm moving this to comments because it has already been raised twice, but it is fine to duck test ISD Is based on the tower. Starships and Speeders identifies the tractor beam targeting array as a feature of the ISD I, and there are no examples that contradict this. Therefore, it is safe to assume that the other Star Destroyers are ISD Is without need for further references, due to the presence of that kind of tower. ThrawnChiss7 Assembly Cupola 14:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 04:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)