This page is for reviews of existing Comprehensive articles. A Comprehensive article review is conducted when a current status article no longer meets one of the standards listed in the CAN rules or has significantly changed from the state it was in at the time of gaining status. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe need updates or require their status removed.
How to nominate:
- Select a Comprehensive article that requires a review.
- Add {{CAreview}} at the top of the article you are creating a review for, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Comprehensive article review previously, the same page will be used.
- Members of Wookieepedia's Discord server can open a review with the following command, and JocastaBot will automatically add the review to this page: @JocastaBot create review for ArticleName
- Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary. A reason for opening the review must be provided.
- Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
- Purge the article to update the template.
- Other users can add additional issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
- On the review, all editors are able to add and address objections noted on the article's review. Afterward, one of several outcomes occurs:
- …all objections are satisfied.
- …all objections have remained unsatisfied for a period of thirty days, without a request for extension.
- …the article has exceeded Comprehensive article word count.
- …the article has changed significantly from its original state.
Closing stages:
- If all objections are addressed, EduCorps review board members can start a vote to close the review after it has been open for a minimum of 48 hours. Three EduCorps votes are required for an article to maintain its Comprehensive status.
- If objections have remained unsatisfied, the article has exceeded the word count, or the article has changed significantly from its original state, the EduCorps review board can send the article to a probationary status. A consensus of at least three EduCorps members is required for an article to retain its Comprehensive status or have it removed at the end of the probation.
- …articles that exceed the word count can have Comprehensive status removed.
- …articles marked for probation that have unsolved objections for over thirty days, with no request for extension or attempts made to fix, can have Comprehensive status removed.
- …articles that have changed significantly from their original state are reviewed by EduCorps members. When determined that the article's current state is satisfactory, the review can be closed, and the article maintains its status.
Comprehensive article reviews
View recent changes for this page and its subpages
Unidentified Gamorrean dancer
Object
- Needs a pronouns/gender update.
- The none for hair color should be removed.
- Tatooine needs conext.
- Judging from the date note, the events of the game take place during the events of TPM, so the note should state as much and include a source which dates the film to that year.
- The BTS could be rewrote to match the modern precedents and remove unnecessary wording. Lewisr (talk) 00:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Comprehensive status
Vote to strip Comprehensive status
Battle of Korriban (Clone Wars)
Object
- Per the layout guide, any events not mentioned in the body need to be removed from the infobox.
- If the date isn't directly citable to the novel then it would be better to use a written date note than the double ref.
- Can a way to include Galactic Republic and Jedi Order in the body be found?
- Should the bts/apps section be changed to indicate that the battle appeared via a vision? Lewisr (talk) 00:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Comprehensive status
Vote to strip Comprehensive status
Battle of Bakura (Clone Wars)
Object
- Per the layout guide, any events not mentioned in the body need to be removed from the infobox.
- Is the seven weeks after the Battle of Geonosis info (in both infobox and body) necessary to include?
- If the date isn't directly citable to the novel then it would be better to use a written date note than the double ref.
- Can a way to include Galactic Republic and Jedi Order in the body be found? Lewisr (talk) 02:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)