The result of the debate was Support proposal. Imperators II(Talk) 09:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relevant SH Here: Forum:SH:LEGO Policy Amendment Drafts
Per the SH preceding this vote, this proposal is to include a clause in the Canon policy denoting how LEGO content is treated in regards to canonicity. The final proposal following discussion on the Senate Hall is as follows:
Add the following clause to WP:Canon's What about...? section's bulleted list:
"LEGO sources. All LEGO sources and media are considered non-canon unless otherwise confirmed by an official source due to the parodic and occasionally anachronistic or canon-contradictory nature of such media. LEGO sources can, however, provide canonical names or identifications for subjects that are considered fully canon, insofar as they are previously unidentified, based on a statement by Lucasfilm Story Group member Pablo Hidalgo regarding character names from the LEGO Star Wars: The Force Awakens video game."
Support[]
- As proposer - Thannus (DFaceG) (he/him) (talk) 23:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- OOM 224 (he/him) 23:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Bonzane10 (holonet) 23:56, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 02:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Imperators II(Talk) 08:04, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- NanoLuukeCloning Facility 11:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Rsand 30 (talk) 13:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Fan26 (Talk) 15:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Lewisr (talk) 18:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- ThrawnChiss7 Assembly Cupola 01:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)