1043

I have a number of columns that I would like to remove from a data frame. I know that we can delete them individually using something like:

df$x <- NULL

But I was hoping to do this with fewer commands.

Also, I know that I could drop columns using integer indexing like this:

df <- df[ -c(1, 3:6, 12) ]

But I am concerned that the relative position of my variables may change.

Given how powerful R is, I figured there might be a better way than dropping each column one by one.

2
  • 37
    Can someone explain to me why R doesn't have something simple like df#drop(var_name), and instead, we need to do these complicated work-arounds?
    – ifly6
    Commented Apr 20, 2018 at 17:16
  • 3
    @ifly6 The 'subset()' function in R is about as parsimonious as the 'drop()' function in Python, except you don't need to specify the axis argument... I agree that it's annoying that there can't be just one, ultimate, easy keyword/syntax implemented across the board for something so basic as dropping a column. Commented Sep 3, 2018 at 8:42

25 Answers 25

1046
Answer recommended by R Language Collective

You can use a simple list of names :

DF <- data.frame(
  x=1:10,
  y=10:1,
  z=rep(5,10),
  a=11:20
)
drops <- c("x","z")
DF[ , !(names(DF) %in% drops)]

Or, alternatively, you can make a list of those to keep and refer to them by name :

keeps <- c("y", "a")
DF[keeps]

EDIT : For those still not acquainted with the drop argument of the indexing function, if you want to keep one column as a data frame, you do:

keeps <- "y"
DF[ , keeps, drop = FALSE]

drop=TRUE (or not mentioning it) will drop unnecessary dimensions, and hence return a vector with the values of column y.

6
  • 25
    the subset function works better as it won't convert a data frame with one column into a vector
    – mut1na
    Commented Jun 28, 2013 at 9:06
  • 5
    @mut1na check the argument drop=FALSE of the indexing function.
    – Joris Meys
    Commented Jun 28, 2013 at 10:10
  • 6
    Shouldn't that be DF[,keeps] instead of DF[keeps] ?
    – lindelof
    Commented Oct 28, 2014 at 13:53
  • 8
    @lindelof No. It can, but then you have to add drop=FALSE to keep R from converting your data frame to a vector if you only select a single column. Don't forget that data frames are lists, so list selection (one-dimensional like I did) works perfectly well and always returns a list. Or a data frame in this case, which is why I prefer to use it.
    – Joris Meys
    Commented Oct 28, 2014 at 19:05
  • 7
    @AjayOhri Yes, it would. Without a comma, you use the "list" way of selecting, which means that even when you extract a single column, you still get a data frame returned. If you use the "matrix" way, as you do, you should be aware that if you only select a single column, you get a vector instead of a data frame. To avoid that, you need to add drop=FALSE. As explained in my answer, and in the comment right above yours...
    – Joris Meys
    Commented Jul 7, 2015 at 13:55
545

There's also the subset command, useful if you know which columns you want:

df <- data.frame(a = 1:10, b = 2:11, c = 3:12)
df <- subset(df, select = c(a, c))

UPDATED after comment by @hadley: To drop columns a,c you could do:

df <- subset(df, select = -c(a, c))
9
  • 3
    I really wish the R subset function had an option like "allbut = FALSE", which "inverts" the selection when set to TRUE, i.e. retains all columns except those in the select list. Commented Jan 5, 2011 at 14:56
  • 4
    @prasad, see @joris answer below. A subset without any subset criteria is a bit of overkill. Try simply: df[c("a", "c")]
    – JD Long
    Commented Jan 5, 2011 at 15:16
  • 1
    @JD I knew that, but I like the syntactic convenience of the subset command where you don't need to put quotes around the column names -- I guess I don't mind typing a few extra characters just to avoid quoting names :) Commented Jan 5, 2011 at 15:18
  • 17
    Note that you shouldn't use subset inside other functions. Commented Oct 3, 2012 at 14:42
  • 2
    @mac stackoverflow.com/questions/12850141/… Commented Sep 30, 2013 at 18:33
265
within(df, rm(x))

is probably easiest, or for multiple variables:

within(df, rm(x, y))

Or if you're dealing with data.tables (per How do you delete a column by name in data.table?):

dt[, x := NULL]   # Deletes column x by reference instantly.

dt[, !"x"]   # Selects all but x into a new data.table.

or for multiple variables

dt[, c("x","y") := NULL]

dt[, !c("x", "y")]
8
  • 42
    within(df, rm(x)) is by far the cleanest solution. Given that this is a possibility, every other answer seems unnecessarily complicated by an order of magnitude. Commented Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00
  • 2
    Note that within(df, rm(x)) will not work if there are duplicate columns named x in df. Commented Jul 15, 2016 at 19:51
  • 2
    @MichaelChirico to clarify, it removes neither but seems to change the data's values. One has bigger problems if this is the case, but here's an example: df <- data.frame(x = 1, y = 2); names(df) <- c("x", "x"); within(df, rm(x)) returns data.frame(x = 2, x = 2).
    – Max Ghenis
    Commented Mar 10, 2017 at 22:23
  • 1
    @MilesErickson Problem is that you rely on a function within() which is powerful but also uses NSE. The note on the help page states clearly that for programming sufficient care should be used.
    – Joris Meys
    Commented Dec 13, 2018 at 13:45
  • 1
    @MilesErickson How often would one encounter a dataframe with duplicate names in it?
    – HSchmale
    Commented Jan 3, 2019 at 19:26
139

You could use %in% like this:

df[, !(colnames(df) %in% c("x","bar","foo"))]
6
  • 1
    Am I missing something, or is this effectively the same solution as the first part of Joris' answer? DF[ , !(names(DF) %in% drops)] Commented Apr 28, 2016 at 5:46
  • 11
    @DanielFletcher: it's the same. Look at the timestamps on the answers. We answered at the same time... 5 years ago. :) Commented Apr 28, 2016 at 13:01
  • 7
    Nutty. identical(post_time_1, post_time_2) [1] TRUE =D Commented Apr 30, 2016 at 2:47
  • Why not drop the comma? I see no reason why df[!(colnames(df) %in% c("x","bar","foo"))] would not be equivalent.
    – J. Mini
    Commented Mar 19, 2021 at 22:19
  • why does it return FALSE/TRUE vector when I run on data.table data frame. Why?
    – Amer
    Commented Jul 7, 2021 at 0:48
67

list(NULL) also works:

dat <- mtcars
colnames(dat)
# [1] "mpg"  "cyl"  "disp" "hp"   "drat" "wt"   "qsec" "vs"   "am"   "gear"
# [11] "carb"
dat[,c("mpg","cyl","wt")] <- list(NULL)
colnames(dat)
# [1] "disp" "hp"   "drat" "qsec" "vs"   "am"   "gear" "carb"
6
  • 1
    Brilliant! This extends the NULL assignment to a single column in a natural way, and (seemingly) avoids copying (although I don't know what happens under the hood so it may be no more efficient in memory usage ... but seems to me clearly more efficient syntactically.)
    – c-urchin
    Commented May 20, 2014 at 16:15
  • 6
    You do not need list(NULL), NULL is sufficient. e.g: dat[,4]=NULL Commented Jul 7, 2014 at 8:29
  • 11
    OP's question was how to delete multiple columns. dat[,4:5] <- NULL won't work. That is where list(NULL) comes in. It works for 1 or more columns.
    – Vincent
    Commented Sep 16, 2014 at 0:01
  • This also doesn't work when trying to remove a duplicated column name. Commented Jul 15, 2016 at 19:58
  • @MichaelChirico Works fine for me. Either give a label if you want to remove the first of the columns with the same name or give indices for each column you want to remove. If you have an example where it doesn't work I'd be interested to see it. Perhaps post it as a new question?
    – Vincent
    Commented Jul 15, 2016 at 22:47
48

If you want remove the columns by reference and avoid the internal copying associated with data.frames then you can use the data.table package and the function :=

You can pass a character vector names to the left hand side of the := operator, and NULL as the RHS.

library(data.table)

df <- data.frame(a=1:10, b=1:10, c=1:10, d=1:10)
DT <- data.table(df)
# or more simply  DT <- data.table(a=1:10, b=1:10, c=1:10, d=1:10) #

DT[, c('a','b') := NULL]

If you want to predefine the names as as character vector outside the call to [, wrap the name of the object in () or {} to force the LHS to be evaluated in the calling scope not as a name within the scope of DT.

del <- c('a','b')
DT <- data.table(a=1:10, b=1:10, c=1:10, d=1:10)
DT[, (del) := NULL]
DT <-  <- data.table(a=1:10, b=1:10, c=1:10, d=1:10)
DT[, {del} := NULL]
# force or `c` would also work.   

You can also use set, which avoids the overhead of [.data.table, and also works for data.frames!

df <- data.frame(a=1:10, b=1:10, c=1:10, d=1:10)
DT <- data.table(df)

# drop `a` from df (no copying involved)

set(df, j = 'a', value = NULL)
# drop `b` from DT (no copying involved)
set(DT, j = 'b', value = NULL)
1
  • For some reason when using datatables, object size does not change in Rstudio's environmental windows. With dataframes, it does so immediately.
    – luchonacho
    Commented Feb 24 at 0:55
48

There is a potentially more powerful strategy based on the fact that grep() will return a numeric vector. If you have a long list of variables as I do in one of my dataset, some variables that end in ".A" and others that end in ".B" and you only want the ones that end in ".A" (along with all the variables that don't match either pattern, do this:

dfrm2 <- dfrm[ , -grep("\\.B$", names(dfrm)) ]

For the case at hand, using Joris Meys example, it might not be as compact, but it would be:

DF <- DF[, -grep( paste("^",drops,"$", sep="", collapse="|"), names(DF) )]
1
  • 2
    If we define drops in the first place as paste0("^", drop_cols, "$"), this becomes much nicer (read: more compact) with sapply: DF[ , -sapply(drops, grep, names(DF))] Commented Apr 13, 2016 at 20:31
45

Another dplyr answer. Use select(-column).

If your variables have some common naming structure, you might try starts_with(). For example

library(dplyr)
df <- data.frame(var1 = rnorm(5), var2 = rnorm(5), var3 = rnorm (5), 
                 var4 = rnorm(5), char1 = rnorm(5), char2 = rnorm(5))
df
#        var2      char1        var4       var3       char2       var1
#1 -0.4629512 -0.3595079 -0.04763169  0.6398194  0.70996579 0.75879754
#2  0.5489027  0.1572841 -1.65313658 -1.3228020 -1.42785427 0.31168919
#3 -0.1707694 -0.9036500  0.47583030 -0.6636173  0.02116066 0.03983268

df1 <- df %>% select(-starts_with("char"))

df1
#        var2        var4       var3       var1
#1 -0.4629512 -0.04763169  0.6398194 0.75879754
#2  0.5489027 -1.65313658 -1.3228020 0.31168919
#3 -0.1707694  0.47583030 -0.6636173 0.03983268

If you want to drop a sequence of variables in the data frame, you can use :. For example if you wanted to drop var2, var3, and all variables in between, you'd just be left with var1:

df2 <- df1 %>% select(-c(var2:var3) )  
df2
#        var1
#1 0.75879754
#2 0.31168919
#3 0.03983268
1
  • 2
    Not to forget about all the other opportunities that come with select(), such as contains() or matches(), which also accepts regex.
    – ha-pu
    Commented Mar 1, 2019 at 17:31
39

Dplyr Solution

I doubt this will get much attention down here, but if you have a list of columns that you want to remove, and you want to do it in a dplyr chain I use one_of() in the select clause:

Here is a simple, reproducable example:

undesired <- c('mpg', 'cyl', 'hp')

mtcars <- mtcars %>%
  select(-one_of(undesired))

Documentation can be found by running ?one_of or here:

http://genomicsclass.github.io/book/pages/dplyr_tutorial.html

0
28

Another possibility:

df <- df[, setdiff(names(df), c("a", "c"))]

or

df <- df[, grep('^(a|c)$', names(df), invert=TRUE)]
2
  • 2
    Too bad that this is not upvoted more because use of setdiff is the optimal especially in the case of a very large number of columns.
    – ctbrown
    Commented Mar 25, 2014 at 21:42
  • Another angle on this: df <- df[ , -which(grepl('a|c', names(df)))]
    – Joe
    Commented Apr 21, 2016 at 9:44
25

Out of interest, this flags up one of R's weird multiple syntax inconsistencies. For example given a two-column data frame:

df <- data.frame(x=1, y=2)

This gives a data frame

subset(df, select=-y)

but this gives a vector

df[,-2]

This is all explained in ?[ but it's not exactly expected behaviour. Well at least not to me...

25
DF <- data.frame(
  x=1:10,
  y=10:1,
  z=rep(5,10),
  a=11:20
)
DF

Output:

    x  y z  a
1   1 10 5 11
2   2  9 5 12
3   3  8 5 13
4   4  7 5 14
5   5  6 5 15
6   6  5 5 16
7   7  4 5 17
8   8  3 5 18
9   9  2 5 19
10 10  1 5 20

DF[c("a","x")] <- list(NULL)

Output:

        y z
    1  10 5
    2   9 5
    3   8 5
    4   7 5
    5   6 5
    6   5 5
    7   4 5
    8   3 5    
    9   2 5
    10  1 5
22

Here is a dplyr way to go about it:

#df[ -c(1,3:6, 12) ]  # original
df.cut <- df %>% select(-col.to.drop.1, -col.to.drop.2, ..., -col.to.drop.6)  # with dplyr::select()

I like this because it's intuitive to read & understand without annotation and robust to columns changing position within the data frame. It also follows the vectorized idiom using - to remove elements.

2
  • Adding to this that (1) user want replace original df (2) magrittr has %<>% operator to replace input object it could be simplified to df %<>% select(-col.to.drop.1, -col.to.drop.2, ..., -col.to.drop.6)
    – Marek
    Commented Nov 23, 2016 at 11:39
  • 1
    If you have a long list of columns to drop, with dplyr, it might be easier to group them and put only one minus: df.cut <- df %>% select(-c(col.to.drop.1, col.to.drop.2, ..., col.to.drop.n))
    – iNyar
    Commented May 4, 2017 at 6:32
16

I keep thinking there must be a better idiom, but for subtraction of columns by name, I tend to do the following:

df <- data.frame(a=1:10, b=1:10, c=1:10, d=1:10)

# return everything except a and c
df <- df[,-match(c("a","c"),names(df))]
df
2
  • 5
    Not a good idea to negate match - df[,-match(c("e","f"),names(df))]
    – hadley
    Commented Jan 5, 2011 at 18:33
  • .@JDLong - What if I want to drop column where the column name starts with -? Commented Jan 22, 2019 at 18:04
13

There's a function called dropNamed() in Bernd Bischl's BBmisc package that does exactly this.

BBmisc::dropNamed(df, "x")

The advantage is that it avoids repeating the data frame argument and thus is suitable for piping in magrittr (just like the dplyr approaches):

df %>% BBmisc::dropNamed("x")
11

Beyond select(-one_of(drop_col_names)) demonstrated in earlier answers, there are a couple other dplyr options for dropping columns using select() that do not involve defining all the specific column names (using the dplyr starwars sample data for some variety in column names):

library(dplyr)
starwars %>% 
  select(-(name:mass)) %>%        # the range of columns from 'name' to 'mass'
  select(-contains('color')) %>%  # any column name that contains 'color'
  select(-starts_with('bi')) %>%  # any column name that starts with 'bi'
  select(-ends_with('er')) %>%    # any column name that ends with 'er'
  select(-matches('^f.+s$')) %>%  # any column name matching the regex pattern
  select_if(~!is.list(.)) %>%     # not by column name but by data type
  head(2)

# A tibble: 2 x 2
homeworld species
  <chr>     <chr>  
1 Tatooine  Human  
2 Tatooine  Droid 

If you need to drop a column that may or may not exist in the data frame, here's a slight twist using select_if() that unlike using one_of() will not throw an Unknown columns: warning if the column name does not exist. In this example 'bad_column' is not a column in the data frame:

starwars %>% 
  select_if(!names(.) %in% c('height', 'mass', 'bad_column'))
10

Another solution if you don't want to use @hadley's above: If "COLUMN_NAME" is the name of the column you want to drop:

df[,-which(names(df) == "COLUMN_NAME")]
2
  • 1
    (1) Problem is to drop multiple columns at once. (2) It won't work if COLUMN_NAME is not in df (check yourself: df<-data.frame(a=1,b=2)). (3) df[,names(df) != "COLUMN_NAME"] is simpler and don't suffer from (2)
    – Marek
    Commented Nov 23, 2016 at 11:34
  • Can you give some more information about this answer? Commented Jan 17, 2018 at 13:04
6

Provide the data frame and a string of comma separated names to remove:

remove_features <- function(df, features) {
  rem_vec <- unlist(strsplit(features, ', '))
  res <- df[,!(names(df) %in% rem_vec)]
  return(res)
}

Usage:

remove_features(iris, "Sepal.Length, Petal.Width")

enter image description here

4

There are a lot of ways you can do...

Option-1:

df[ , -which(names(df) %in% c("name1","name2"))]

Option-2:

df[!names(df) %in% c("name1", "name2")]

Option-3:

subset(df, select=-c(name1,name2))
3

Drop and delete columns by columns name in data frame.

A <- df[ , c("Name","Name1","Name2","Name3")]
1

Find the index of the columns you want to drop using which. Give these indexes a negative sign (*-1). Then subset on those values, which will remove them from the dataframe. This is an example.

DF <- data.frame(one=c('a','b'), two=c('c', 'd'), three=c('e', 'f'), four=c('g', 'h'))
DF
#  one two three four
#1   a   d     f    i
#2   b   e     g    j

DF[which(names(DF) %in% c('two','three')) *-1]
#  one four
#1   a    g
#2   b    h
1

If you have a large data.frame and are low on memory use [ . . . . or rm and within to remove columns of a data.frame, as subset is currently (R 3.6.2) using more memory - beside the hint of the manual to use subset interactively.

getData <- function() {
  n <- 1e7
  set.seed(7)
  data.frame(a = runif(n), b = runif(n), c = runif(n), d = runif(n))
}

DF <- getData()
tt <- sum(.Internal(gc(FALSE, TRUE, TRUE))[13:14])
DF <- DF[setdiff(names(DF), c("a", "c"))] ##
#DF <- DF[!(names(DF) %in% c("a", "c"))] #Alternative
#DF <- DF[-match(c("a","c"),names(DF))]  #Alternative
sum(.Internal(gc(FALSE, FALSE, TRUE))[13:14]) - tt
#0.1 MB are used

DF <- getData()
tt <- sum(.Internal(gc(FALSE, TRUE, TRUE))[13:14])
DF <- subset(DF, select = -c(a, c)) ##
sum(.Internal(gc(FALSE, FALSE, TRUE))[13:14]) - tt
#357 MB are used

DF <- getData()
tt <- sum(.Internal(gc(FALSE, TRUE, TRUE))[13:14])
DF <- within(DF, rm(a, c)) ##
sum(.Internal(gc(FALSE, FALSE, TRUE))[13:14]) - tt
#0.1 MB are used

DF <- getData()
tt <- sum(.Internal(gc(FALSE, TRUE, TRUE))[13:14])
DF[c("a", "c")]  <- NULL ##
sum(.Internal(gc(FALSE, FALSE, TRUE))[13:14]) - tt
#0.1 MB are used
1

Another option using the function fselect from the collapse package. Here is a reproducible example:

DF <- data.frame(
  x=1:10,
  y=10:1,
  z=rep(5,10),
  a=11:20
)

library(collapse)
fselect(DF, -z)
#>     x  y  a
#> 1   1 10 11
#> 2   2  9 12
#> 3   3  8 13
#> 4   4  7 14
#> 5   5  6 15
#> 6   6  5 16
#> 7   7  4 17
#> 8   8  3 18
#> 9   9  2 19
#> 10 10  1 20

Created on 2022-08-26 with reprex v2.0.2

0

Another data.table option which hasn't been posted yet is using the special verb .SD, which stands for subset of data. Together with the .SDcols argument you can select/drop columns by name or index.

require(data.table)
# data
dt = data.table(
  A = LETTERS[1:5],
  B = 1:5,
  C = rep(TRUE, 5)
)
# delete B
dt[ , .SD, .SDcols =! 'B' ]
# delete all matches (i.e. all columns)
cols = grep('[A-Z]+', names(dt), value = TRUE)
dt[ , .SD, .SDcols =! cols ]

A summary of all the options for such a task in data.table can be found here

0
df <- data.frame(
+   a=1:5,
+   b=6:10,
+   c=rep(22,5),
+   d=round(runif(5)*100, 2),
+   e=round(runif(5)*100, 2),
+   f=round(runif(5)*100, 2),
+   g=round(runif(5)*100, 2),
+   h=round(runif(5)*100, 2)
+ )
> df
  a  b  c     d     e     f     g     h
1 1  6 22 76.31 39.96 66.62 72.75 73.14
2 2  7 22 53.41 94.85 96.02 97.31 85.32
3 3  8 22 98.29 38.95 12.61 29.67 88.45
4 4  9 22 20.04 53.53 83.07 77.50 94.99
5 5 10 22  5.67  0.42 15.07 59.75 31.21

> # remove cols: d g h
> newDf <- df[, c(1:3, 5), drop=TRUE]
> newDf
  a  b  c     e
1 1  6 22 39.96
2 2  7 22 94.85
3 3  8 22 38.95
4 4  9 22 53.53
5 5 10 22  0.42

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.