Yes. Given the radii of the upper and lower moons and knowing their angular velocities, there are simple expressions that give the periapsis and apoapsis radius of the Zero Relative Velocity Transfer Orbit.
The specific angular momentum, h, of an orbit is constant. At any point on the orbit the specific angular momentum $\overrightarrow{h}$ is the cross product between the position and velocity vectors:
$\overrightarrow{h} = \overrightarrow{v}$ X $\overrightarrow{r}$
And so
$\overrightarrow{h} = \overrightarrow{v}_{periapsis}$ X $\overrightarrow{v}_{periapsis}=\overrightarrow{v}_{apoapsis}$ X $\overrightarrow{v}_{apoapsis}$
Position and velocity vectors are at right angles to one another at periapsis and apoapsis. So a cross product gives us the same magnitudes with ordinary multiplication.
$h = v_{periapsis} * r_{periapsis} = v_{apoapsis} * r_{apoapsis}$
What’s the length of $r_{periapsis}$ and $r_{apoapsis}$?
And what’s $v_{periapsis}$ and $v_{apoapsis}$?
Speed of a point on a vertical elevator is $\omega * r$ where r is the distance from center of rotation and $\omega$ is angular velocity of the elevator. In this case the Phobos elevator has the angular velocity of Phobos and the Deimos elevator has the angular velocity of Deimos.
$v_{periapsis}=\omega_{phobos}*r_{periapsis}$
$v_{apoapsis}=\omega_{deimos}*r_{apoapsis}$
Recall that
$v_{periapsis} * r_{periapsis} = v_{apoapsis} * r_{apoapsis}$
Substituting
$v_{periapsis}=\omega_{phobos}*r_{periapsis}$ and $v_{periapsis}=\omega_{deimos}*r_{apoapsis}$,
$\omega_{phobos} * r_{periapsis} * r_{periapsis}= \omega_{deimos}*r_{apoapsis}*r_{apoapsis}$
$\omega_{phobos} * r_{periapsis}^2= \omega_{deimos}*r_{apoapsis}^2$
Substituting
$r_{periapsis}=(1-e)a$ and $r_{apoapsis}=(1+e)a$,
$\omega_{phobos} *((1-e)a)^2= \omega_{deimos}*((1+e)a)^2$
$\omega_{phobos} *(1-e)^2= \omega_{deimos}*(1+e)^2$
$((1-e)/(1+e))^2= \omega_{deimos}/\omega_{phobos}$
$(1-e)/(1+e)= \sqrt{\omega_{deimos}/\omega_{phobos}}$
And now we can find eccentricity of the ZRVTO given angular velocities of each moon:
$\mathbf{e=(1-(\omega_{deimos}/\omega_{phobos})^{1/2})/(1+(\omega_{deimos}/\omega_{phobos})^{1/2})}$
Now we need to find the periapsis and apoapsis of the ZRVTO.
At peri and apoapsis, magnitude of specific angular momemtnum is $v*r$.
Since $v = \omega*r$ we can say
$h=\omega*r^2$
Specific angular momentum is also twice the area swept by the orbit over an orbital period or
$h=2\pi ab/T$
$h=2\pi ab/(2\pi\sqrt{a^3/\mu})$
$h=ab/\sqrt{a^3/\mu}$
$h=a*a\sqrt{1-e^2}/(a^{3/2}\sqrt{\mu}$
$h=a^2\sqrt{1-e^2}/(a^{3/2}\sqrt{\mu})$
$h=a^{1/2}\sqrt{1-e^2}\sqrt{\mu}$
$h=(a(1-e^2)\mu)^{1/2}$
The angular momentum of the ZRVTO from the top of the Phobos tether is
$h=\omega_{phobos}*r_{periapsis}^2=(a(1-e^2)\mu)^{1/2}$
Now
$r_{periapsis}=(1-e)a$
so $a=r/(1-e)$.
Substituting for a…
$\omega_{phobos}*r_{periapsis}^2=((r/(1-e))(1-e^2)\mu)^{1/2}$
$\omega_{phobos}*r_{periapsis}^2=((r(1+e)\mu)^{1/2}$
$r_{periapsis}^2=((r(1+e)\mu)^{1/2}/\omega_{phobos}$
$r_{periapsis}^4=(r(1+e)\mu)/\omega_{phobos}^2$
$r_{periapsis}^3=(1+e)\mu/\omega_{phobos}^2$
Now
$\omega_{phobos} = 2\pi/T_{phobos}$
Where $T_{phobos}$ is Phobos' orbital period.
$T_{phobos}=2\pi\sqrt{r_{phobos}^3/\mu}$
where $r_{phobos}$ is the distance from Phobos to the center of Mars.
So
$\omega_{phobos} = 2\pi/((2\pi\sqrt{r_{phobos}^3/\mu})$
The $2\pi$ in the numerator and denominator cancel out
$\omega_{phobos} = 1/\sqrt{r_{phobos}^3/\mu})$
Substituting this Value for $\omega_{phobos}$ into
$r_{periapsis}^3=(1+e)\mu/\omega_{phobos}^2$
we get
$r_{periapsis}^3=(1+e)\mu\sqrt{r_{phobos}^3/\mu}^2$
$r_{periapsis}^3=(1+e)\mu r_{phobos}^3/\mu$
The $\mu$ s cancel out
$r_{periapsis}^3=(1+e)r_{phobos}^3$
Which brings to the the periapsis radius in terms of the e we've already found and the orbital radius of Phobos.
$\mathbf{r_{periapsis}=(1+e)^{1/3}r_{phobos}}$
In a similar fashion apoapsis of our Zero Relative Velocity Transfer orbit is (1+e)a and
$\mathbf{r_{apoapsis}=(1-e)^{1/3}r_{deimos}}$
I put these expressions into a spreadsheet ZRVTO_finder.xslx. A screenshot:
![ZRVTO spreadsheet](https://cdn.statically.io/img/i.sstatic.net/YrLZ0.png)
Here's a pic drawn from the spreadsheet's numbers:
![enter image description here](https://cdn.statically.io/img/i.sstatic.net/JIxst.png)
It is reassuring my numbers are close to Penzo's. I'm just an amateur but Penzo was a very competent aerospace engineer working for JPL.
There are many tidelocked moons in nearly circular, coplanar orbits. The above expressions can be generalized:
$\mathbf{e=(1-(\omega_{UpperMoon}/\omega_{LowerMoon})^{1/2})/(1+(\omega_{UpperMoon}/\omega_{LowerMoon})^{1/2})}$
$\mathbf{r_{periapsis}=(1+e)^{1/3}r_{LowerMoon}}$
$\mathbf{r_{apoapsis}=(1-e)^{1/3}r_{UpperMoon}}$
The upper and lower moon could also be artificial objects, man made anchors for vertical orbital tethers. If we know the moons' angular velocities and orbital radii, it is easy to figure the tether lengths to accommodate Zero Relative Velocity Transfer Orbits between the two.