The Supreme Court decision granting former presidents broad protection from prosecution kicked to the trial court key rulings about how much of Donald Trump’s indictment on election charges can stand.
By
The Supreme Court’s immunity decision directed the trial court to hold hearings on what portions of the indictment can survive — a possible chance for prosecutors to set out their case in public before Election Day.
By
In arguing to the Supreme Court that he cannot be charged for acts while in office, Donald Trump has asked the justices to enforce a norm that he has long threatened to shatter.
By Alan Feuer and
Such a ruling would probably send the case back to a lower court and could delay any trial until after the November election.
By
Advertisement
As Donald Trump heads to the Republican convention, his criminal cases look a lot less threatening.
By Alan Feuer and Maggie Haberman
Justice Amy Coney Barrett has found her voice.
By Stephen I. Vladeck
The postponement was likely to cause only minor delays to the case, which has already slowed to a crawl with Judge Aileen Cannon’s previous decisions.
By Alan Feuer
The former president’s lawyers asked to freeze nearly all proceedings while they sort out whether the Supreme Court decision applies to charges focused on actions after he left the White House.
By Alan Feuer
El tribunal declaró que los expresidentes tienen inmunidad por sus acciones oficiales. Este fallo revela cómo los jueces conservadores ven el poder del líder de la nación.
By Charlie Savage
The Supreme Court’s conservative majority largely embraced Donald Trump’s dark view of tit-for-tat partisan prosecutions while liberals cited the prospect of power unchecked by legal accountability.
By Alan Feuer
Más allá de Donald Trump, la decisión se suma a la expansión aparentemente unidireccional de la autoridad ejecutiva.
By Charlie Savage
Analistas y observadores ya preveían, a grandes rasgos, la decisión que establece que los presidentes merecen protección considerable por sus actos oficiales. Trump lo proclamó como una victoria.
By Maggie Haberman
The Supreme Court’s decision to grant presidents immunity from prosecution over official actions is an extraordinary expansion of executive power. Charlie Savage, a reporter for The New York Times, analyzes the ruling by the court’s conservative majority, its long-term implications, and the three liberal justices’ vehement dissent.
By Nikolay Nikolov, Karen Hanley, Charlie Savage and James Surdam
Donald J. Trump’s lawyers want to argue that a Supreme Court decision giving presidents immunity for official acts should void his felony conviction for covering up hush money paid to a porn star.
By Ben Protess, William K. Rashbaum, Kate Christobek and Wesley Parnell
Advertisement
Advertisement