I'm convinced that Michael Atkinson is corrupt. Voting him out is not just for getting an R rating for games (although I agree we need one) but getting an Attorney General who is actually clean and does his/her job. He is actually a person of interest by the police and may be implicated in corruption charges. I refer you to this site.
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,26435966-5006301,00.html
Unfortunately getting rid of this criminal is going to be harder than we all think. The Labor party want him in because he is their bitch. They don't want an independant body for corruption because ALOT of them would be looked into by this body. Voting for either Gamer's for Croydon, or worst case scenario the Liberal Party seems a safer bet. For me this started with trying to get an R rating for games, the more I dig and research this, the more I see this man as a political criminal who should have charges against him brought to light. Why do you think he's so into classification and making it harder for R rated movies to get into the home? He's trying to distract us from all these allegations against him. The Ralph Clarke incident, the Stashed Cash affair, hell I'm almost convinced the Labor Party knows of all this but sweeps it under the rug... and I'm a Labor voter and I'm saying this. I'm disgusted to have this man in my state as the AG and as far as I'm concerned, he's dirty, his workers are dirty, he needs to be either voted out, fired, arrested, or quit. I'm not saying I wish violent acts against him, but if he had a heart attack, I would go to town and get sooooooooooo drunk partying I would probably forget my name. R rating for games, yes. A corrupt law maker, I won't stand for that.