69

Oh yellow box of error
How I miss your background hue
Parsing your words of terror
From the many to the few

Now replaced by a simple line
That's vertical and grey
A designer thought it fine
But to me it caused dismay

I used to Edit questions so
Your yellow box would appear
Instead I'll give my nose a blow
And in memory shed a tear

From afar it's now all a blur
And the quotes are hard to track
They were so easy to infer
Can we change the colour back?

Scratte

25
  • 9
    You should have used a yellow box for this ... Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 12:19
  • 4
    The colour should be changed to blue
    – bzr
    Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 12:49
  • 7
    I am also already missing the yellow box
    – RiggsFolly
    Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 12:52
  • 17
    From afar it's now all a blur. And the quotes are hard to track. They were so easy to infer. Can we change the colour back?
    – Scratte
    Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 13:45
  • 2
    In raiment gold the box did stand, then guided by an unseen hand. Behold a quest to bring it back, new life to breathe upon our Stack. Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 14:05
  • 5
    1. Website changes something. 2. Users dislike the change. 3. User wants the change reverted, but doesn't provide a reason why one is better than the other. 4...?
    – Cerbrus
    Commented Mar 11, 2020 at 11:14
  • 4
    @Cerbrus In response to 3: I'm not convinced that this poetry is subtle enough that it requires reading between the lines. I cannot speak for everyone, so I liked the "background hue" and find it better than "a simple line". I also don't like that "quotes are hard to track", but I much prefer that they're "easy to infer". I'd think those were reasons.
    – Scratte
    Commented Mar 11, 2020 at 11:26
  • 4
    All I see there is a personal preference and a user not taking a moment to get used to a changed design, as is very common with design changes on websites.
    – Cerbrus
    Commented Mar 11, 2020 at 12:19
  • 5
    @BoltClock you were so confused you first had to post an answer? ;) Welcome back!
    – rene
    Commented Mar 11, 2020 at 13:29
  • 3
    @Cerbrus related reason: meta.stackexchange.com/a/343923/287976, meta.stackexchange.com/a/344849/287976 and meta.stackexchange.com/a/343921/287976. None of them had been addressed by SE as declined and why, which gives a feeling of "we'll do as we want anyway"
    – Tensibai
    Commented Mar 11, 2020 at 13:31
  • 2
    @Tensibai: Those answers don't provide strong arguments other than a personal preference.
    – Cerbrus
    Commented Mar 11, 2020 at 14:07
  • 2
    @Cerbrus They're more supported than the announcement itself... which makes me feel the general preference goes that way. I won't die on this hill anyway but I also missed parts of answers were quotes without background text and it made me wonders why two paragraph in the same post were antagonists until realizing the first was a quote from another answer I hadn't read yet.
    – Tensibai
    Commented Mar 11, 2020 at 14:31
  • 6
    @Cerbrus It was dead easy to see quotes at a glance before due to the entire block being shaded but now it is definitely not as simple. How is this not reason enough? In fact I might just going to write a userscript to revert it back myself.
    – Taazar
    Commented Mar 11, 2020 at 14:59
  • 3
    @JohnRotenstein: Error messages are usually more readable when they're formatted in a (<!-- langugage: lang-none -->) code block.
    – Cerbrus
    Commented Mar 12, 2020 at 7:47
  • 3
    I see that now blockquotes are highlighted without highlighting, well done...
    – TGrif
    Commented Mar 13, 2020 at 19:58

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .