-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue 247 - Draft guidelines for forum moderation #248
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to explain clearly the policy in relation to editing or deleting posts on a list, which go in two directions:
- How to handle the situation when a deletion or edit is itself a violation of the CPC.
- The circumstances in which addressing a violation should/must/must not include editing or deleting a post, and who has the responsibility for doing that.
This document talks specifically about email lists, but much discussion in W3C groups today happens in GitHub issues, so I suggest bringing that in scope. |
ListModeration.md
Outdated
|
||
Main responsibilities: | ||
- Follow all posted content, at least enough to notice whether any content violates W3C policies. | ||
- Ensure that list participants abide by the [W3C Code of Professional Conduct](https://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/) (CPC). The enforcement approach should depend on the circumstances: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CEPC, unless/until we decide to change name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done in the latest version.
I think this is now addressed in the latest version, because the latest version now refers broadly to "any suspected violation" of the CEPC.
Based on feedback during the 14-Mar-2023 meeting, guidance on addressing a violation was removed and instead the document points to https://github.com/w3c/PWETF/blob/main/DisputeResolution.md for guidance on handling it. |
Done in the latest version. |
ForumModeration.md
Outdated
|
||
Other responsibilities: | ||
- Follow all posted content, at least enough to notice whether any content violates W3C policies. | ||
- Ensure that list participants abide by the [W3C Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct](https://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/) (CEPC). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest removing "list" here, it seems unnecessary, and not always applicable, e.g., when not a mailing list.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. I've made that change in the latest version.
This addresses #247