Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Safety vs Comfort section additional clarity on the first bullet. #263

Closed
jspellman opened this issue May 4, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #290
Closed

Safety vs Comfort section additional clarity on the first bullet. #263

jspellman opened this issue May 4, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #290

Comments

@jspellman
Copy link
Contributor

in the first bullet:

  • "Reverse" -isms, including "reverse racism," "reverse sexism," and "cisphobia".

It isn't clear what party is has priority in this situation. I think I know what you intend, but it reads like cis white men need protection from these "reverse"-isms. This is an important bullet and I want it crystal clear what you mean. As woman who has been corrected for "reverse sexism" for calling out sexist behavior by men in W3C, it is important to be clear that reverse-isms are unacceptable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants