-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 812
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Structured product returns #2288
Comments
Needs definition texts adding. Examples too.
First cut at an implemented proposal:
Example usage (I've not added this to repo):
|
Also added a disclaimer that the enumeration doesn't capture all aspects of the policies. /cc #2288
hasProductReturnPolicy does not pass Google's structured data testing tool. You can paste the snippet in there. |
@rhroyston That's probably because there is some inevitable delay between new terms entering the vocabulary specification and they being supported in various testing tools and environments. The assumption is they will be soon. It might be worth providing feedback in the SDTT to encourage it's support. |
(See #2381 for the renaming) |
Implemented |
I've got issues with https://schema.org/ReturnFeesEnumeration, only https://schema.org/FreeReturn can be validate on https://search.google.com/test/rich-results, but it does not fit my need... I would rather use https://schema.org/ReturnShippingFees.. Here is my Json mark up : Help me please !! |
Hi, apparently (according to ahrefs.com) the field "applicableCountry" is required for "MerchantReturnPolicy". My issue is, the return policy is valid worldwide, so I cannot specify a ISO code for the country (e.g. US). How can I tackle this? |
(proposal from Google)
It would be useful for Schema.org to have expressivity that allowed various merchants to describe their return policies. As always there are various levels of detail that might be made explicit. Our suggestion is to start with something like the following:
Main concepts:
Plus these as "useful to have":
Exceptions would be things like "this policy applies to everything except fish and electronics..." and are consequently difficult here because of the lack of a common taxonomy to point into. The usual Schema.org workaround in such a case would be to at least document text or URL values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: