Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Block Hooks API: Insert metadata at the same time as hooked blocks #6358

Conversation

tjcafferkey
Copy link

@tjcafferkey tjcafferkey commented Apr 4, 2024

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/59574

The block hooks UI toggle relies on the ignoredHookedBlocks when determining whether to show the toggle in the Site Editor UI. The current problem is that for uncustomized templates we don't add this meta data. Currently the visitor functions have a default callback of insert_hooked_blocks and we only add the meta data when we're writing to the database via an available filter in the template controller.

This PR creates a new default callback which both inserts the hooked blocks and adds the ignoredHookedBlocks meta data to the anchor block, and makes this the new default callback for the visitor functions. This means we will continue to add ignoredHookedBlocks meta when writing to the database meaning this operation happens twice. Although not ideal this is necessary to cover the following scenarios;

  • When the user adds an anchor block within the editor we still need to add the ignoredHookedBlocks meta to it to prevent hooked blocks hooking on to it unexpectedly on the frontend, this means we keep parity between the frontend and editor.
  • When a user writes template data to the database directly through the API (instead of the editor) we need to again ensure we're not inserting hooked blocks unexpectedly.

It is worth noting that with this change it means the first hooked block to insert relative to its anchor block will be accepted. Any additional blocks of the same type (ie a second core/loginout block) trying to hook onto the same anchor block will be ignored, irrespective of the position.

Manual testing instructions:

1 . Clear template customizations
2. Add the first code block to your themes functions.php
3. Go to the Single Posts template and check the loginout block is inserted after the post content.
4. Click the post content to check the toggle exists to show/hide the hooked block.
5. Save the template
6. Add the second code block and reload the Single Posts template. Follow steps 1-4 again and check them against the Page List block.

function register_loginout_hooked_block( $hooked_blocks, $position, $anchor_block, $context ) {
	if ( $anchor_block === 'core/post-content' && $position === 'after' ) {
		$hooked_blocks[] = 'core/loginout';
	}

	return $hooked_blocks;
}
add_filter( 'hooked_block_types', 'register_loginout_hooked_block', 10, 4 );
function register_pagelist_hooked_block( $hooked_blocks, $position, $anchor_block, $context ) {
	if ( $anchor_block === 'core/post-content' && $position === 'before' ) {
		$hooked_blocks[] = 'core/page-list';
	}

	return $hooked_blocks;
}
add_filter( 'hooked_block_types', 'register_pagelist_hooked_block', 10, 4 );

This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@tjcafferkey tjcafferkey marked this pull request as ready for review April 4, 2024 10:26
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2024

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props tomjcafferkey, bernhard-reiter, gziolo.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

@ockham ockham self-requested a review April 4, 2024 10:36
src/wp-includes/blocks.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/wp-includes/blocks.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@ockham ockham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good overall, thank you! Just a few small thing we should tweak a bit 😄

@tjcafferkey
Copy link
Author

@gziolo since @ockham is AFK I was wondering how I should proceed with this?

src/wp-includes/blocks.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@ockham ockham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works like a charm! Thank you very much for taking care of this 🚀

@ockham
Copy link
Contributor

ockham commented May 23, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants