SharedArrayBuffer always on - how sweet!
Social Media Photo by You Le on Unsplash
These examples represent a dual-exchange between tha Main thread and the Worker one.
To see more examples, please check the test folder:
Remember to run a local server to test these modules, or check the live test page.
import {
Atomics,
BigInt64Array,
Int32Array,
SharedArrayBuffer,
addEventListener, // use this to add worker listeners
postMessage, // use this to post worker messages
ignore, // use this to bypass data parsing
} from 'sabayon/worker';
// intercept things to be notified
addEventListener('message', event => {
const { handle, complex } = event.data;
handle[0] = 1;
// release the waiter
Atomics.notify(handle, 0);
});
const sab = new SharedArrayBuffer(4);
const view = new Int32Array(sab);
postMessage({
// will be automatically handled by sabayon
handle: view,
// this value is passed AS-IS
passThrough: ignore({ complex: "data" })
});
// use the async version out of the box
Atomics.waitAsync(view, 0).value.then(result => {
// result === 'ok'
console.log('view changed', [...view]);
});
// or use the sync one ... please note:
// sync wait requires serviceWorker option
// when the worker is created on the main thread
Atomics.wait(view, 0);
console.log('view changed', [...view]);import {
Atomics,
BigInt64Array,
Int32Array,
SharedArrayBuffer,
Worker,
ignore, // use this to bypass data parsing
} from 'sabayon/main';
const w = new Worker('./worker.js', {
type: 'module',
// optional ServiceWorker to enable sync wait
// on the Worker side of affairs
serviceWorker: './sw.js',
});
w.addEventListener('message', event => {
const { handle, complex } = event.data;
handle[0] = 1;
// release the waiter sync or async
Atomics.notify(handle, 0);
});
const sab = new SharedArrayBuffer(4);
const view = new Int32Array(sab);
postMessage({
// will be automatically handled by sabayon
handle: view,
// this value is passed AS-IS
passThrough: ignore({ complex: "data" })
});
// on main thread, only waitAsync is possible by standard
Atomics.waitAsync(view, 0).value.then(result => {
// result === 'ok'
console.log('view changed', [...view]);
});This module comes with a basic, yet handy, CLI utility that saves sabayon/sw export into a path.
npx sabayon ./public/sw.jsPlease note that if you have your own Service Worker logic already in place, you can use the sabayon/sw-listeners export to simply augment your file:
import { activate, fetch, message } from 'sabayon/sw-listeners';
// Way No #1
// you can either add these listeners first
// as `event.stopImmediatePropagation()` is used
// whenever the `event` is handled
addEventListener('fetch', fetch);
addEventListener('message', message);
// Way No #2
// alternatively, you can use those callbacks
// and eventually do nothing if preventDefault()
// was called via that `event`
addEventListener('fetch', event => {
fetch(event);
if (event.defaultPrevented) return;
// your previously implemented logic
});
addEventListener('message', event => {
message(event);
if (event.defaultPrevented) return;
// your previously implemented logic
});It is still important to add at least both fetch and message listeners, while activate ensures that event.waitUntil(clients.claim()) is invoked so that workers can bootstrap right after when the serviceWorker option is passed along.
Why is this needed?
Both SharedArrayBuffer and some Atomics operations require special headers to work out of the box.
This has been an endless source of pain for various projects, where the suggested solutions can be summarized as such:
- there is no way around the fact to enable both technologies one needs special headers to have native functionality and performance and this is still the preferred way to use these APIs
- a ServiceWorker based workaround, such as mini-coi, could be used to automatically enable, whenever it's possible, those headers where it's not possible to change these otherwise (like on GitHub pages or other similar hosts)
- ... and yet, even using mini-coi might create friction for edge cases where embedding YouTube content or other 3rd party domains might not like augmented headers for their services
- there is no polyfill for any of these primitives, one that can actually be used as "drop-in" replacement for all the globals that surround this part of the Web (SharedArrayBuffer, Int32Array, Atomics.wait, Atomics.waitAsync and Atomics.notify)
This project goal is to enable all of that, like a polyfill would do, without needing to patch anything at the global context level 🎉
P.S. this module also enables out of the box Firefox missing notifyAsync via its own logic.
How does this work?
Using a minimal runtime feature detection, such as:
try {
new SharedArrayBuffer(4);
}
catch (polyfillRequired) {
// the polyfill
}It is possible to detect when the current page is capable of using native features and simply export these without affecting at all performance or standard behavior.
When such constructor does not exist or it fails at allocating anything more than 0 bytes though, a workaround is orchestrated in both the main thread and each worker created through such main, and here is how.
If we remove the Shared prefix, it's all about ArrayBuffer, and that's indeed how SAB class is created:
SharedArrayBuffer = class extends ArrayBuffer {}Once that's done, the only wrappers able to deal with that kind of buffer are Int32Array and BigInt64Array.
const extend = (Class, SharedArrayBuffer) => class extends Class {
constructor(value, ...rest) {
super(value, ...rest);
if (value instanceof SharedArrayBuffer) {
// logic to track / recognize these wrappers
// when postMessage are used to send data
// and "message" listeners intercept such data
}
}
};
BigInt64Array = extend(BigInt64Array, SharedArrayBuffer);
Int32Array = extend(Int32Array, SharedArrayBuffer);There is a little known, yet wonderful, API that is structuredClone. Its functionality is used in various APIs such as IndexedDB and postMessage.
What makes it special and useful for these scenarios is its ability to deal with recursion, which in turns means it's able to send the same reference over the wire only once, still preserving the identity at the receiver side of affairs:
const complexData = { huge: "payload" };
// Worker
// this will send complexData same reference at
// both index 0 and index 1 .data
postMessage([complexData, { data: complexData }]);
// Main
worker.addEventListener('message', event => {
const [complexData, obj] = event.data;
// true - no assertion failed
console.assert(complexData === obj.data);
});Connecting the dots, so far we have a way to recognize and track views that are meant to be posted and received around plus a way to intercept such views on the other side, using a basic CHANNEL based protocol, nothing really too different from the way MQTT works.
// main page - ensure a unique channel per page/tab
const CHANNEL = crypto.randomUUID();
// when post message is used and there are views to send
postMessage([CHANNEL, action, views, data])
// views will be a Set of views that is also contained in dataOn the other side, when these kind of message are received, all views are temporarily stored so that any Atomics operation that would like to wait, waitAsync or notify these views, the logic knows these have a unique identifier themselves (that is just a forever increasing i++) so that such view knows that it should be updated on the other side and release the lock after some cleanup.
While this orchestration seems reasonable enough, Atomics.wait is a blocking operation that must pause the worker until that view has been notified at some index on the other side (the main thread).
To provide this pause/blocking mechanism we need a way to block the current worker until such view has been notified ... but we need something not blocked behind the scene to make this happen 🤔
Abusing XMLHttpRequest in sync mode it is then, so we can POST a message with enough details that will produce a pending Response until such details are forwarded to any page or tab that is registered and that recognize the unique CHANNEL, to then wait for that page to tell us back the view has been notified, by sending the view content that is then returned as JSON response, so that the worker can access the xhr.responseText, parse that array, update the view that was waiting to be notified, and finally get out of the Atomics.wait(view, index) operation in a 100% synchronous fashion that moved asynchronously that Service Worker and one main thread in the meanwhile.
As summary
- there is a unique (per page/tab) communication CHANNEL that is both sent and intercepted on
messageevents, able to orchestrate via actions all needed operations on any side of affair - there is a mechanism to automatically crawl and track views that contain the semi-fake SharedArrayBuffer but one can also opt-out via an
ignoreutility - there is an asynchronous communication for
Atomics.waitAsyncthat just works by updating and awaiting back and forward those views - there is an optional Service Worker where data is posted that can orchestrate blocking-like operations on the worker side, when
Atomics.waitis used instead of waitAsync
... and that's pretty much it.
Measured "on my machine", these are results passing along a { some: 'value', view } object where the view is a new Int32Array(new SharedArrayBuffer(4)) base ref.
Native
- waitAsync from Main - use a Worker to
notify(...): 11ms - waitAsync from a Worker - use Main to
notify(...): 0.4ms - wait sync from a Worker - use Main to
notify(...): 0.3ms
Polyfill
- waitAsync from Main - use a Worker to
notify(...): 12ms (about the same) - waitAsync from a Worker - use Main to
notify(...): 0.8ms (~2x slower) - wait sync from a Worker - use Main to
notify(...): 2ms (~7x slower due ServiceWorker ↔ Main roundtrip taking 90% of the time)
Note that due lack of real SharedArrayBuffer primitive the memory consumption can be temporarily duplicated on both Main and Workers but fear not, no leaks happen so this should never be a real-world issue.
- the optional Service Worker, if sync
Atomics.wait(...)is desired, MUST be a local file. It cannot be downloaded as module, even ifsabayon/swexport exists. - differently from the Int32Array, the BigInt64Array does not work with sync
Atomics.wait(...)in emulation mode, due inability to easily represent these entries via JSON. - no interrupts (timeout handlers) possible when in emulation mode. These are complex to implement via ServiceWorker and quite possibly not super common out there. If proper headers are used though, everything would work natively without any issue whatsoever.
- notify(view, index) are currently the only supported arguments when running in emulation mode. This is due the inability to make sense of a
countargument and due the fact interrupts don't work so that adelaymakes little sense. You can still pass these values if you like but in emulation these will be ignored.