-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 381
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
www.spiegel.de is withholding contents even when whitelisted / PB disabled #1607
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Sounds related to #1596. |
|
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I should have made this clear: The screenshot shows the whitelisting and
as a result the never-ending loading of the news page. If I don't
whitelist the message appears, if I disable PB everythings fine.
Am 21.09.2017 um 15:46 schrieb Alexei:
… why the message is still triggered if the site if manually whitelisted
@alanton <https://github.com/alanton> How did you manually whitelist
the site? Post a screenshot if that's helpful.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1607 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Ad89MfLaQykjgQFu47WZiYSNKmcE7NaWks5skmirgaJpZM4PEbLB>.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@Spiegel-Leser I removed a duplicate comment.
Oh, this sounds like another problem, something on top of the ad blocking message. What browser do you use? What is your browser version? What version of Privacy Badger do you have? What other add-ons do you have installed? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
If I use Bouncer to block specific third-parties I only get the "please deactivate your Adblocker" message" when imagesrv.adition.com is blocked. It would be interesting to see if PB is blocking this domain in some circumstances. There are no cookies in it when I look but maybe it triggers PB in some other way. |
I don't see tracking from |
The German Telemedia Act (Section 13) requires that the recipient of the service (site visitor) is told when their data is passed on to another service provider i.e third-party, and that the recipient of the service can terminate the use of the service at any time. The ability to block some or all third-parties must be an acceptable way to do that, especially as the site does not offer any other way. You could say the site is denying a legal right by completely blocking access if someone exercises their right. On first visit to the home page: Cookies & Third-Party Domains on http://www.spiegel.de/ There are 15 first-party probable UID cookies and 16 third-party probable UID cookies from 53 domains First Party UID Cookies: Third Party UID Cookies: First Party Domains: Third Party Domains: Cookie data collected by Baycloud Bouncer https://baycloud.com/bouncerDownload |
I made it work by allowing |
Allowing |
also remember to disable the firefox internal |
My news site www.spiegel.de seems to use tracking ads, which are blocked by PB, correspondingly. As they see that as a non-discriminating ad-blocker, they don't serve contents to me any more but for a frame asking me to whitelist / disable my ad-blocker. Thing is, regardless of the PB whitelist or a disabled (!) PB, they still recognize an ad-blocker. Only removing PB helps!
How can they even recognize the disabled PB?
Why does whitelisting www.spiegel.de not help?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: