User talk:98Tigerius

Welcome to my talk page!
Please click here to leave a new message!

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 98Tigerius, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 09:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, 98Tigerius! The list you nominated, List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i never saw it done anywhere and don't see the benefit of doing so. Time is given and people can see if it is going on. Kante4 (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check the pdf i added for the combined ranking, it's a different one. Kante4 (talk) 21:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I reverted it back. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 21:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the edit, livescore said game was over. Even when i tuned into the game it said over with the old result, so my bad. Kante4 (talk) 17:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What livescore site? I suggest to go to Olympic site or click the report link on each match on tournament articles. Alternative is flashscore site. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, it was flashscore. Changed now their aswell but when i watched the last two points it had the old result in with finished. Will double check next time. Kante4 (talk) 17:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already explained to you why I moved the reference – I moved it to the later premiere date to avoid broken references in the future when they are deleted when the show premieres. Why did you revert my edit again? – Nisf (talk) 12:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing broken in the reference and as you've said it can be moved to the later date when second season premieres. And as what I put in my first revert summary – WP:AINT 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 13:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there I just wanted to say I’m a big admirer of your work on here and thought I might take the opportunity to express my being a fan of your work and wanted to ask u something 2.98.155.255 (talk) 10:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's interesting of you, but what do you want to ask? 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 10:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Say if there was a dispute over an actor being in a show would IMDb be good for proving someone was in a show once the show was out or would credits be better for prove sorry odd question 2.98.155.255 (talk) 12:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No as IMDd is not a reliable source of information as per WP:IMDB whereas it can only be useful as a link in the "External link" section of a BLP article(s). 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 12:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I’m guessing credits then 2.98.155.255 (talk) 13:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good talk really 2.98.155.255 (talk) 14:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]