Template talk:Rough Draft Studios

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American This template is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles This template is supported by the American animation work group. Futurama This template is within the scope of WikiProject Futurama, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futurama articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FuturamaWikipedia:WikiProject FuturamaTemplate:WikiProject FuturamaFuturama articles WikiProject Futurama tasks: edit history watch purge Here are some open WikiProject Futurama tasks: Ongoing Bring Futurama up to FA status. Better define article assessment levels and reassess to include C class. Needs attention All images linked in any Futurama article need to have a fair use rationale, this includes: episode articles done Character and list of character pages All miscellaneous pages (as linked in the Futurama template) All episode pages need to meet the standards of WP:NTVEP. A basic layout for how this can be accomplished is under discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Futurama/Archive 2#Episode article organization-revisited. Examples to follow include "Space Pilot 3000" and "Hell Is Other Robots". Expand Futurama Comics and its issues. Articles related to Producers, Directors and Writers Other ways to help: Monitor changes to the project, changes to articles and changes to this to-do list. (view talk edit)

This template was considered for deletion on 13 July 2013. The result of the discussion was "keep".

Ok, so, perhaps "related companies" should be defined -- or renamed. "Related companies", I would imagine, would be limited to companies having worked with RDS or on the same project as RDS. Whether all the currently listed "related companies" fit this description, I don't know. It just seems a bit over-length. Just throwing that out there. -- Chickenmonkey ^X  sign?  17:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Navboxes should consist of links between articles that a reader would be likely to want to go to from the article they are currently on. Navboxes should also be inclusive enough to encompass the whole of a subject without becoming watered down with extraneous links to articles which may have a loose connection to each other. The "related companies" group is not needed and has consistently been increased to overpower the other information contained in the template. Therefore, I think the "related companies" group should be discarded. Does anyone disagree?  Chickenmonkey  21:48, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There have been a couple of recent edits adding "darkorange" coloring to this template. I contend that this is a gratuitous use of coloring, and is entirely unwarranted. As such, it goes against current Wikipedia policy on color use. Perhaps a discussion on this issue can be had here, instead of pursuing an edit-war.  Chickenmonkey  23:05, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]