Jump to content

Talk:Intelligence collection management

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CCIRM and NATO

[edit]

If anyone would like to take this on, I'd be grateful. Indeed, is there any central repository of NATO unclassified documentation? I seem to find it in random places.

It isn't clear to me how CCIRM, for example, differs from the intelligence cycle, although I suspect it has something to do with the way requests are entered. Are operations and warning centers part of CCIRM?

Non-NATO alliances

[edit]

I'm thinking especially of ASEAN, knowing that UKUSA isn't going to be available. Any other sources?

Please look at WEU material in SIGINT platforms and see if that belongs elsewhere, or perhaps the part there is OK, but there needs to be more general material, higher in the hierarchy, about WEU, EU, etc. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 16:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Research in Collection Guidance

[edit]

It seems this section is focused on one study with regarding to a theoretical approach to "ontologies" in collection requirements which is both unfielded and untested. I would highly recommend this section be removed as it is not directly related to the topic and provides no useful information regarding collection requirements processes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bear bs (talkcontribs) 02:38, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Intelligence collection management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]