Category talk:Philosophical arguments

This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Logic This category is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Associated task forces: /  Logic

I've included category:Paradoxes in here. Although some of the paradoxes presented in that category are not directly philosophical, they may well be of interest in terms of their logical structure, or so on. Banno 08:15, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This category seems to include both philosophical arguments (chains of reasoning that support a conclusion) and philosophical debates (arguments in the sense of "we got into an argument with one another"). Probably harmless, but perhaps a bit confusing. I think putting articles like the Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence into a category of philosophical debates would make better sense. 2601:47:4302:2B60:A82B:F7DC:F283:68B1 (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]