Template talk:ISO standards

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 1234qwer1234qwer4 in topic Versatile Video Coding as 23090-3

I changed the numbering

edit

The template was grouped by

  • 1-9k
  • 10k-20k
  • 20k-

but I changed it to say

  • 1 to 9999
  • 10000 to 19999
  • 20000+

It looks a little uglier but it is more correct. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:13, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

There may be some merit in splitting the numbers up the same was as in the List of International Organization for Standardization standards article, for the sake of consistency, ie:
    • 1-999
    • 1000-9999
    • 10000-19999
    • 20000-29999
    • 30000-39999
    • 40000+ (This doesn't match the article, which only has 80000)
Mitch Ames (talk) 04:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Adding ISO 21500 Guidance for Project Management

edit

I am writing several articles on project management as part of the ASCE Body of Knowledge project ( or ASCE BoK) as well as the Project Management Institute Body of Knowledge project ( or PM BoK). ISO cites and parallels a lot of the materials.... Thanks ...

Risk Engineer (talk) 17:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2019

edit

Include ISO 26262 Standard in the list (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_26262) Cynosure1 (talk) 23:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

  DoneJonesey95 (talk) 07:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

WP:BRINT for 14496-10

edit

Can we get 14496-10 updated for WP:BRINT? The article seems to have been renamed. It should link directly to Advanced Video Coding (avoiding the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC redirect). Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Done 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk) 23:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Versatile Video Coding as 23090-3

edit

Can we get 23090-3 added? It should link to Versatile Video Coding. This can be seen at MPEG-I — MPEG. Thank you. 50.53.23.14 (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

The page you linked does not mention the standard, so I don't know if this should be done yet. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Well if you won't take that one how about this one which certainly means it is published ("Stage: 60.00 (Under publication)" as of 2021-01-20): https://www.iso.org/standard/73022.html 50.53.23.14 (talk) 22:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Done 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply