Skip to main content

Review: Poco F6 and F6 Pro

Xiaomi’s Poco F6 has a solid camera, and it’s matched with the best display and processor you can get at this price.
WIRED Recommends
Left 2 thin mobile phones stacked. Center Back side of 2 thin mobile phones showing their cameras. Right Top view of 2...
Photograph: Simon Hill

If you buy something using links in our stories, we may earn a commission. This helps support our journalism. Learn more. Please also consider subscribing to WIRED

Rating:

7/10

WIRED
Excellent display. Silky performance. Fast charging. Solid main camera. Relatively affordable. F6 has an IP64 rating.
TIRED
Software is not great. Bloatware galore. Battery life is average. No wireless charging.

With so many excellent midrange smartphones available now, how do you choose? Every year, Xiaomi’s Poco range pushes hardware expectations, and the Poco F6 and F6 Pro are no exception. The Poco F6 Pro (£499) struggles to justify the Pro tag, but the cheaper Poco F6 (£399) is an absolute bargain (even more so if you bagged the early-bird price of £339). You will struggle to find this processing power or display quality elsewhere without paying more.

Xiaomi routinely rebadges affordable phones released in China under its Redmi brand as Poco phones for Europe and the rest of the world, though they are not sold in the United States. Poco quickly built a reputation for value, and the F6 is a strong example of why. It ticks all the boxes with a gorgeous display, zippy performance, capable camera, and fast charging, though the software and battery life let it down some.

The Poco F6 could be the perfect phone for gamers on a budget this year and is almost compromise-free. The Pro is not worth the extra cash, so I’ll focus on the Poco F6 in this review, but I will drill deeper into the differences below.

Identity Crisis

The design is perhaps the least interesting thing about these phones, but it is also the most obvious difference. The Poco F6 is all-plastic, with a flat frame, a gently curved shimmery back that doesn’t show finger smudges, and two huge camera lenses at the top left flanked by a smaller flash. My review unit is a handsome green, but it also comes in black or a beige gold that Xiaomi calls titanium.

The F6 Pro has an aluminum frame and a glass back with a marble effect finish. My review unit is black, but you can also opt for white. The camera module is far bigger, spanning almost the whole top of the F6 Pro, with three medium-sized lenses and a flash in a symmetrical grid of four. The F6 Pro is a touch thicker and heavier than its sibling, and you can tell it is the more expensive of the two, though I preferred the F6. The Poco branding is mercifully subtle. That said, neither design is very exciting.

Photograph: Simon Hill

Both phones have a fingerprint sensor under the screen, and it worked fine for me, usually unlocking the first time. But it is weirdly low compared with other phones, so I kept having to adjust the position of my thumb. Strangely, the F6 has a superior IP64 rating for water resistance and Gorilla Glass Victus to protect the screen, while the F6 Pro is IP54 and has the older Gorilla Glass 5.

These phones are almost identically sized, both boasting a 6.67-inch AMOLED with a 120-Hz refresh rate, though you must activate it in the display settings. The distinction is the resolution, with the F6 Pro at 3,200 x 1,440 pixels and the F6 at 2,712 x 1,220 pixels, and the F6 Pro is supposed to get a bit brighter. Even side-by-side, I couldn’t see much of a difference. Both screens are sharp and bright enough to see outdoors. These are solid phones for movie watching (if you must watch movies on your phone) with stereo speakers and support for Dolby Vision and HDR10+.

Photograph: Simon Hill

Game On

Gaming is where it’s really at with the F6 and F6 Pro. With a Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor, the Poco F6 is quite simply the fastest phone in its price bracket. Whether you’re tearing around the track in Asphalt 9: Legends or slaying baddies in Genshin Impact, the Poco F6 lets you crank the settings up and enjoy smooth gameplay.

While the Poco F6 got warm after a long gaming session, that’s not unusual. But I was a little disappointed by the battery life. Both phones pack a 5,000-mAh battery, which sounds like plenty, but with a lot of gaming or photography, you may have to reach for that charger before bedtime. The F6 comes with a 90-watt charger and USB-C cable and takes around 40 minutes to fully charge. The F6 Pro shaves a few minutes off with a 120-watt charger, but it’s a minor difference. It’s a shame there’s no wireless charging, but that’s still rare in this price bracket.

The entry-level Poco F6 has 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage. I tested a step-up model with 12 GB RAM and 512 GB storage (£449). It never felt less than snappy. The Poco F6 Pro comes with 12 GB of RAM as standard and a choice of 256 or 512 GB of storage. There is also a 16-GB and 1-TB Pro model (£599), but only in some markets.

Photograph: Simon Hill

The Poco tagline is “Everything You Need, Nothing You Don't,” but these phones are packed with bloatware. Google apps are tucked away in a folder, with Xiaomi’s Mi apps front and center, and you get a further two folders packed with crappy apps and games. It’s easy to sort out, but I wish the phones came without them.

What’s harder to change is Xiaomi’s HyperOS. This user interface replaces MIUI, and it’s a slight improvement, but it still feels and looks more like Apple’s iOS than Android. Having used Xiaomi phones for a while now, I’m used to it, but I still hate the indecipherable quick settings icons and having to swipe down on the left for notifications or the right for settings. Xiaomi promises a fairly average three Android upgrades and four years of security patches for these phones.

Capable Camera

You can’t expect a top-tier camera in a phone at this price, but I appreciate the approach Xiaomi has taken with the Poco F6. The main shooter, which you will use most of the time, is a 50-megapixel Sony IMX882 that captures good photos in various settings. Landscape shots, portraits, and close-ups are decent, provided there is light, but it struggles in the dark or with moving subjects. It is backed up by an 8-megapixel ultrawide and a 20-megapixel front-facing camera, though neither is very good.

The Pro adds a largely useless 2-megapixel macro camera, but the main camera has a larger sensor to make the most of limited light. It also has a 16-megapixel front-facing camera. Photos are slightly sharper on the Pro, but colors are closer to reality on the F6. Both can capture decent 4K video, though only the Pro offers 24 frames per second for that cinematic feel.

While these phones are better across the board than last year’s Poco F5 and F5 Pro (6/10, WIRED Review), and the mid-year refresh Poco X6 and X6 Pro (7/10, WIRED Review), the cheaper F6 has lost one thing: the headphone port. Despite that loss, the Poco F6 is the clear pick this year and the most improved sibling. I don’t think the Pro does enough to justify the extra cost.

If you can stretch your budget, the Pixel 8A (8/10, WIRED Recommends) tops our best Android phone guide. For something closer in price to the Poco F6, you might consider the Nothing Phone (2a) (9/10, WIRED Recommends). But for gamers on a budget, the Poco F6 is a winner.