Predator odor exposure increases food-carrying behavior in rats
- PMID: 26556540
- DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.11.005
Predator odor exposure increases food-carrying behavior in rats
Abstract
To cover their energy demands, prey animals are forced to search for food. However, during foraging they also expose themselves to the risk of becoming the prey of predators. Consequently, in order to increase their fitness foraging animals have to trade-off efficiency of foraging against the avoidance of predation risk. For example, the decision on whether a found food piece should be eaten at the food source or whether it should be carried to a protective site such as the nest (food-carrying behavior), is strongly dependent on different incentive factors (e.g., hunger level, food size, distance to the nest). It has been shown that food-carrying behavior increases the more risky the foraging situation becomes. Since predator odors are clearly fear-inducing in rats, we ask here whether the detection of predator odors in close proximity to the food source modulates food-carrying behavior. In the present study, the food-carrying behavior of rats for six different food pellet sizes was measured in a "low risk" and a "high risk" testing condition by presenting water or a fox urine sample, respectively, next to the food source. For both testing conditions, food-carrying behavior of rats increased with increasing food pellet weight. Importantly, the proportion of food-carrying rats was significantly higher during exposure to fox urine ("high risk") than when rats were tested with the water control ("low risk"). Taken together, these results demonstrate that food-carrying behavior of rats is increased by the detection of a predator odor. Our data also support the idea that such food-carrying behavior can be considered as a pre-encounter defensive response.
Keywords: Foraging; Fox urine; Innate fear; Pre-encounter defensive response; Risk avoidance.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Wild Norway Rats Do Not Avoid Predator Scents When Collecting Food in a Familiar Habitat: A Field Study.Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 21;8(1):9475. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27054-4. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29930280 Free PMC article.
-
Aggregation in quads but not pairs of rats exposed to cat odor or bright light.Behav Processes. 2012 Jul;90(3):331-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.014. Epub 2012 Apr 3. Behav Processes. 2012. PMID: 22480792
-
The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29(8):1123-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Aug 8. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005. PMID: 16085312 Review.
-
Coyote urine, but not 2-phenylethylamine, induces a complete profile of unconditioned anti-predator defensive behaviors.Physiol Behav. 2021 Feb 1;229:113210. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113210. Epub 2020 Oct 14. Physiol Behav. 2021. PMID: 33068564
-
The smell of danger: a behavioral and neural analysis of predator odor-induced fear.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29(8):1157-67. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.008. Epub 2005 Aug 10. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005. PMID: 16095694 Review.
Cited by
-
Predator odour but not TMT induces 22-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats that lead to defensive behaviours in conspecifics upon replay.Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 23;8(1):11041. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28927-4. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30038341 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources