Pubic hair grooming injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments
- PMID: 23040729
- PMCID: PMC3559025
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.025
Pubic hair grooming injuries presenting to U.S. emergency departments
Abstract
Objective: To describe the demographics and mechanism of genitourinary (GU) injuries related to pubic hair grooming in patients who present to U.S. emergency departments (EDs).
Materials and methods: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System contains prospectively collected data from patients who present to EDs with consumer product-related injuries. The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System is a stratified probability sample, validated to provide national estimates of all patients who present to U.S. EDs with an injury. We reviewed the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System to identify incidents of GU injury related to pubic hair grooming for 2002-2010. The variables reviewed included age, race, gender, injury type, location (organ) of injury, hospital disposition, and grooming product.
Results: From 2002 to 2010, an observed 335 actual ED visits for GU injury related to grooming products provided an estimated 11,704 incidents (95% confidence interval 8430-15,004). The number of incidents increased fivefold during that period, amounting to an estimated increase of 247 incidents annually (95% confidence interval 110-384, P = .001). Of the cohort, 56.7% were women. The mean age was 30.8 years (95% confidence interval 28.8-32.9). Shaving razors were implicated in 83% of the injuries. Laceration was the most common type of injury (36.6%). The most common site of injury was the external female genitalia (36.0%). Most injuries (97.3%) were treated within the ED, with subsequent patient discharge.
Conclusion: Most GU injuries that result from the use of grooming products are minor and involve the use of razors. The demographics of patients with GU injuries from grooming products largely paralleled observations about cultural grooming trends in the United States.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prevalence of Pubic Hair Grooming-Related Injuries and Identification of High-Risk Individuals in the United States.JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Nov 1;153(11):1114-1121. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.2815. JAMA Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28813560 Free PMC article.
-
Pubic hair grooming practices in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: prevalence, side effects and association with sexually transmitted infections.Int J STD AIDS. 2020 Oct;31(11):1034-1039. doi: 10.1177/0956462420941709. Epub 2020 Aug 4. Int J STD AIDS. 2020. PMID: 32753000
-
Hair removal-related injuries in the United States, 1991-2014.J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016 Dec;15(4):444-451. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12283. Epub 2016 Sep 5. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016. PMID: 27596260
-
Pubic hair preferences, reasons for removal, and associated genital symptoms: comparisons between men and women.J Sex Med. 2015 Jan;12(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12763. Epub 2014 Nov 14. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 25394526
-
Pseudofolliculitis barbae: understanding the condition and the role of facial grooming.Int J Cosmet Sci. 2016 Jun;38 Suppl 1:24-7. doi: 10.1111/ics.12331. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2016. PMID: 27212468 Review.
Cited by
-
The Potential Cutaneous Effects of Pornography Addiction: A Narrative Review.Cureus. 2022 Dec 28;14(12):e33066. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33066. eCollection 2022 Dec. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36721540 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Practices and complications of pubic hair removal among Saudi women.BMC Womens Health. 2018 Oct 22;18(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0661-6. BMC Womens Health. 2018. PMID: 30348152 Free PMC article.
-
Pubic Hair Shaving Is Correlated to Vulvar Dysplasia and Inflammation: A Case-Control Study.Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2017;2017:9350307. doi: 10.1155/2017/9350307. Epub 2017 Aug 27. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 29104417 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of Pubic Hair Grooming-Related Injuries and Identification of High-Risk Individuals in the United States.JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Nov 1;153(11):1114-1121. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.2815. JAMA Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28813560 Free PMC article.
-
The Preference of Women and Men Regarding Female Genital Depilation.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017 Sep;39(9):488-495. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604472. Epub 2017 Aug 7. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017. PMID: 28783855 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Herbenick D, Schick V, Reece M, et al. Pubic hair removal among women in the United States: prevalence, methods, and characteristics. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3322–3330. - PubMed
-
- Tiggemann M, Hodgson S. The hairlessness norm extended: reasons for and predictors of women’s body hair removal at different body sites. Sex Roles. 2008;59:889–897.
-
- Toerin K, Wilkinson S, Choi PYL. Body hair removal: the “mundane” production of normative femininity. Sex Roles. 2005;52:399–406.
-
- Schick VR, Rima BN, Calabrese SK. Evulvalution: the portrayal of women’s external genitalia and physique across time and the current Barbie doll ideals. J Sex Res. 2011;48:74–81. - PubMed
-
- Bercaw-Pratt JL, Santos XM, Sanchez J, et al. The incidence, attitudes and practices of the removal of pubic hair as a body modification. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011;25:12–14. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical