On June 3rd, CREATe participated in a roundtable on IP, AI, and Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) in the UK, organised by Harriet Deacon from the University of Hull and hosted by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport in London. The discussion was sparked by the UK’s adoption of the UNESCO 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of ICH 🤚 Experts from academia, government, heritage organisations, and creative industries explored AI’s role in ICH inventorying and IP. Key concerns included digital exclusion, loss of control over ICH, and securing compensation. Proposed solutions ranged from a sui generis system for ICH to technological protection measures like Glaze and Nightshade 🌐 The event also highlighted the challenges around ‘fixation’ in copyright law and the dynamic nature of ICH. Future research areas include the tension between ‘open culture’ and community stewardship, part of CREATe’s themes on Access to Knowledge and Legal History 🔎 CREATe is eager to continue investigating these issues. We’re collaborating with Creative Commons on a new research project on open business models in the GLAM sectors and have several ongoing projects on AI. A promising outcome is a potential collaboration with Paula Westenberger on her project Responsible AI for Heritage 🤝
CREATe’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
I'm pleased to introduce ArtifAI, the project I recently worked on. ArtifAI is designed to identify the origins of artworks, helping to determine whether they are AI-generated or created by humans. It also aids in locating artworks' potential sources on the internet. ArtifAI addresses the unique challenges of copyright in the digital age, combining advanced AI technology with a GPT-based consultant to resolve copyright queries effectively. This tool is crucial for artists, legal experts, and art enthusiasts who need to safeguard and understand artwork provenance in this new era. I invite all artists, legal professionals, and art enthusiasts to explore and utilize ArtifAI, to better manage and understand the rights associated with artworks in this digital era. Here is the link to the platform: https://lnkd.in/gete3muR
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Glad to be in Brussels today for the conference organized by BVA-ABA Belgische Vereniging voor het Auteursrecht - Association Belge pour le Droit d'Auteur “The Automated Author: Take Control or Take The Money?” and join reputed scholars, professionals and policy makers to reflect on the future of Copyright and Generative AI in the EU. I will present on the “Alternatives to the opt-out to secure fair remuneration for creators: What role for the AI regulator?” and argue that the AI act cannot be the final answer with regard to this very important issue of Generative AI and that new solutions need to be imagined in order to safeguard future creativity and the remuneration interests of creators. More fundamentally, a reflection needs to be started urgently with regard to the governance structure of the EU copyright system in the Online world and new independent institutional guidance needs to be provided beyond the newly created AI office. The amazing program of the event can be consulted here:
programme_30_04_2024.pdf
aba-bva.be
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
📢 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗳𝗹𝗮𝘀𝗵: 𝗞𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝟮𝟭𝗰𝗼-𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝘀 𝗮 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗨𝗞 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗮𝗳𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗔𝗜 𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 🥅 𝘖𝘶𝘳 𝘨𝘰𝘢𝘭: Encourage the UK to introduce 𝗮 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗣𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗜 𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 while making it a safe place to do AI ⚠️ 𝘖𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘯: 𝗔𝗜 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗸𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗽𝘆𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁. Clearly, there are certainly many challenges that AI poses – from product safety and privacy, to excessive market concentration by a few large tech actors to job security – 𝗰𝗼𝗽𝘆𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗶𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲𝘀 however 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗻, 𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁, 𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹. 📝 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵: “Whilst questions have arisen in the past which consider 𝗰𝗼𝗽𝘆𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 implications in relation to new technologies, this is the first time that such debate 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗸𝘀 entirely 𝗵𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆.” 💡 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵: “In order to support and incentivise researchers and innovators, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗨𝗞 𝗶𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗮 𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗽𝘆𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 that encourages the many exciting economic and social opportunities that AI makes possible.” 🗣️ 𝘊𝘰-𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘒𝘙21 𝘢𝘳𝘦: 🔹 IP Federation 🔹 European Alliance for Research Excellence 🔹 The Entrepreneurs Network 🔹 Creative Commons 🔹 Wikimedia UK 🔹 RLUK - Research Libraries UK 🔹 Libraries and Archives Copyright Alliance (LACA) 🔹 OpenUK 🔹 BSA | The Software Alliance 🔗 𝘖𝘶𝘳 𝘣𝘭𝘰𝘨 & 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵: https://lnkd.in/eNuCR9tg #AI #UK #Artificialintelligence #copyright #innovation #education #research #TDM
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🇨🇳 'China and our universities threaten to undermine Britain’s creativity', writes Andrew Orlowski "Even in a land with plenty of eccentrics, an #engineer in Missouri called Stephen Thaler stands out. Thaler is a man on a mission. The #computerscientist ’s most cherished creation is an #AI programme called DABUS. But it is not just any old AI, Thaler insists. #DABUS has feelings, invents things, and produces original art, its creator claims. Over several years he has filed many claims and appeals to Intellectual Property (IP) agencies around the world, including in the #UK, demanding that human IP rights be assigned to DABUS. The international treaties that underpin national law are quite clear, however: copyrights and patents can’t be assigned to a non-human entity. And certainly not an algorithm. In a rare visit to his workshop, The Economist compared Thaler to Pygmalion: “The sculptor who fell in love with his artwork after it sprang to life”. But Thaler’s eccentric crusade is not just a distracting aside – it has profound #geopolitical consequences. Giving IP protection to non-human entities opens a Pandora’s Box of trouble. #Software companies who develop Instagram filters could claim they were the real artists, not the photographer or painter using them. The most ambiguous computer generated squiggle could be copyrighted, and lookalikes then contested in court. Overworked patent offices would soon be spammed with junk inventions." Read the rest of his column here 👇 https://lnkd.in/ed9N5yHW
China and our universities threaten to undermine Britain’s creativity
telegraph.co.uk
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
New CREATe Working Paper: ‘AI and Performers’ Rights in Historical Perspective’ by Elena Cooper – CREATe: Dr Elena Cooper, a Senior Research Fellow at CREATe, argues that as independent academic researchers, our role in policy-making settings is important. In a new article published in the European Intellectual Property Review, Dr Cooper highlights the need to understand legal history in the debate on the future of performers' rights. The article calls for a debate on the differences in legal treatment between authors and performers in the context of AI usage. This article was cited by Laurence Bouvard, Chair of Equity's Screen and new Media Committee, at a parliamentary event on the worker experience of the AI revolution. - IP topics: Intellectual Property topics! #ip #intellectualproperty #copyright
New CREATe Working Paper: ‘AI and Performers’ Rights in Historical Perspective’ by Elena Cooper
https://www.create.ac.uk
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Our senior legal counsel and ai specialist Silvia A. Carretta will moderate a conference on copyright, text and data mining, and artificial intelligence on June 14 ⚡ If you want to know more about the topic, register at the link in the first comment!
If you are a copyright aficionado and are familiar with these acronyms #TDM #AI #CR, then you're in for a treat! I'm excited to moderate a conference on the intersections between Text and Data Mining exception in Copyright and Artificial Intelligence - my two favourite research domains! (and now everyone knows what the acronyms stand for 😉) Join us at: 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗽𝘆𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁, 𝗧𝗗𝗠 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗔𝗜 📆 Friday, June 14 📍 Aula Magna @Stockholm University & online Organised by: Svensk biblioteksförening Wikimedia Sverige IMK (Institute of Intellectual Property, Marketing and Competition Law) KnowledgeRights21 I can’t wait to be back in Stockholm for the occasion, meet new colleagues and catch up with old friends! 🤞🏻🚀 👉🏻 The conference will explore the legal and practical challenges faced by researchers using TDM and AI methods. It will address the importance of flexible copyright norms, EU and national legislation impact on AI, and the pivotal role of research libraries in shaping AI advancements. Attendees include academics, researchers, politicians and representatives of public authorities. 👉🏻 Registration is required (link in comments) and participation is free of charge. #modernlawyer #ai #copyright
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Legal Counsel | Data & Privacy💻🔒 Protection | IP Law💡 Enthusiast | Doctoral Candidate (Copyright Law)
In the realm of #copyrightlaw, a revolution is brewing☕️ The digital crucible is forging a new reality, where lines blur between man and machine, creator and creation. AI, the alchemist of the modern era, conjures art and intellect with a cold, calculated precision. Yet, in this gilded age of artificial ingenuity, the foundations of ownership tremble. Piet #Mondrian [one of my favorite artists whose pictures I recently saw at the Tate Gallery of Modern Art in London💂🏻♂️🎡] was a pioneer of abstract art, working in an era far removed from the technological advancements we see today. His work represents the pinnacle of #humancreativity within a specific historical and artistic context. So, if nowadays anyone could be a „#Mondrian“ by using #AI, it‘s maybe time to redefine #originality and #creativity. Shouldn’t we raise the bar of what can be actually copyrighted? Otherwise everyone and anyone could monopolize the way we communicate or create. 👉🏼I highly recommend the article from Udo Di Fabio, a lawyer and professor at the University of Bonn and a former judge on the Federal Constitutional Court, who wrote an insightful article for the Süddeutsche Zeitung „Can machines invoke artistic freedom?“💫[link in the comments]. He rightly raises fundamental questions about the nature of authorship, ownership, and the very concept of creativity itself. The Text-and-Data-Mining (TDM) exception, introduced in an attempt to bridge the gap, has proven to be inadequate and in need of revision. The future of copyright law lies in striking a balance between fostering innovation🌱 and protecting the rights of creators©️. Key considerations for copyright law in the age of generative AI ➖Establishing authorship and ownership: Clear guidelines are needed to determine who holds the copyright for works created by or in collaboration with AI systems. ➖Defining originality and creativity: The threshold for what constitutes an original and creative work needs to be reassessed in light of AI's capabilities. ➖Ensuring fair compensation: Mechanisms must be developed to ensure that creators are fairly compensated for the use of their works in AI training and generation processes. #copyrightlaw #artist #artlaw #AI
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Technological advancement should not come at human or rights-based cost. Short term profit from unregulated #aiart #artificialintelligence #illustration #art #music only means paying more in damages/compensation later when rights are enforced. The #UK has a chance to be an example on how to achieve technological advancement *whilst* securing artists' rights and ensuring proper regulation of #ai - Department for Culture, Media and Sport must take this opportunity and heed not just EU's lead on #airegulation , but work with groups like The AOI DACS EGAIR - European Guild for Artificial Intelligence Regulation Collecting Societies for European Visual Artists National Society for Education in Art and Design (NSEAD) Dr. Joy Buolamwini Ravit Dotan, PhD and individual artists to this end. https://lnkd.in/ecARdwpk
Ministers told to 'sit up and take notice' over concerns about AI being trained on artists' work
msn.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Lead Data Scientist | AI Leader | General Manager at Reliance Jio | LLM & GenAI Pioneer | AI Evangelist
Is 𝐀𝐈 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐬? 🎨✨ The 𝑩𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒃𝒂𝒏𝒆 𝑷𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒕 𝑷𝒓𝒊𝒛𝒆 boldly 𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐀𝐈-𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬, but what does this mean for the world of art? 🏆 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐳𝐞: The Brisbane Portrait Prize, with a top award of $50,000, stands as a significant competition in Queensland's art scene. 🤖 𝐀𝐈 𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: For the first time, this competition welcomes entries created wholly or partially by generative artificial intelligence, provided they are original and fully owned by the entrant. 🔄 𝐄𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐀𝐫𝐭: Acknowledges that the definition of art is dynamic, reflecting societal changes and technological advancements. 📜 𝐓𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬: Entrants must declare full copyright over their submissions, ensuring that the artwork is their genuine creation. 💬 𝐇𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐬: Reflects on past controversies, noting that traditional artists initially resisted digital and photographic entries, which have now become widely accepted. 🚪 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐃𝐨𝐨𝐫𝐬: Highlights the role of technology in making art more accessible, especially for artists with disabilities through assistive technologies. 🧠 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐄𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭: Stresses that artworks requiring "sufficient independent intellectual effort" by the artist will likely qualify for copyright protection. The Brisbane Portrait Prize's 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭 𝐀𝐈-𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐬 𝐚 𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐞 in recognizing the 𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐲. This bold move not only challenges traditional notions of artistry but also heralds a new era where artificial intelligence becomes an integral part of the creative process. As we navigate this exciting frontier, the competition serves as a testament to art's perpetual evolution, mirroring the ever-changing fabric of society. https://lnkd.in/gU4fYQir
Australian ‘contemporary’ Portrait Prize accepts AI-generated entries
indiaai.gov.in
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Joint letter to Members of the European Parliament on the impact of Artificial Intelligence on the European creative community On 23 July 2024, a coalition of 13 international and European organisations representing creators, authors, artists, performers and creative workers, including UVA - United Voice Artists, sent a letter to newly elected Members of the European Parliament on the impact of Artificial Intelligence on the European creative community. Find the full letter below (Link+PDF). #AI technology is deployed more and more widely, it is also important to acknowledge a darker aspect of this technology: all generative AI models in existence today have been trained in full opacity on enormous amounts of copyright-protected content and personal data which have been scraped 🤖 and copied from the internet, without any authorisation nor any remuneration for the creators we represent. In addition, the use of AI-generated deep fakes and other AI- manipulated content is a real threat to our democracies, our members’ reputation and to citizens’ trust in the veracity of digital content. 🕗Time to question the flaws and misinterpretation of the current EU Copyright framework in relation to generative AI 💪The AI Act is a step in the right direction but still needs to be properly enforced ☝️We urge MEPs to engage in a comprehensive and democratic debate leading to a clear legal framework preserving the rights and the integrity of the works of creators Find the full letter below (Link+PDF). https://lnkd.in/dnWzVtCu #AI #AiAct #copyright #gdpr #creators #authors #artists #media #journalist #performers #creative #film #music #cinema #movie #tv #books #dubbing #voiceover #advertising #culture #humanfirst European Commission European Parliament European Data Protection Board Emmanuelle Du Chalard CEATL ECSA European Composer & Songwriter Alliance Fédération européenne des journalistes EGAIR - European Guild for Artificial Intelligence Regulation European Writers' Council (EWC) FERA - Federation of European Screen Directors Fédération internationale des journalistes FIA - Fédération Internationale des Acteurs FIM International Federation of Musicians FSE Federation of Screenwriters in Europe International Artist Organisation - IAO IFJ - International Federation of Journalists UNI Global Union
To view or add a comment, sign in
1,391 followers