📢 CAIDP Update 6.16 - AI Policy News (July 1, 2024) 📖 OECD Report Calls for Alignment of AI Development with Privacy Protection 🇪🇺 EU Tightens Grip on AI: Competition and Oversight in Focus 🇹🇷 🇧🇷 🇶🇦 Turkey, Brazil, and Qatar Advance AI Governance with New Regulations and Guidelines 🏛 CAIDP Advocates for Stronger AI Safeguards in Federal Privacy Bill 🌏 CAIDP President Participates in UNESCO Policy Dialogue on AI Governance 📰 CAIDP Advocates for Opt-In AI Training Policies in NYT Letter #aigovernance #Turkey #Brazil #Qatar OECD.AI European Union UNESCO The New York Times
Center for AI and Digital Policy’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
📢 CAIDP Update 6.29 - AI Policy News (July 22, 2024) 🌐 Council of Europe Provides Overview of Groundbreaking AI Treaty 🇬🇧 UK's New Government Signals Tougher Stance on AI Regulation 🤖 GPAI Report Highlights Importance of Algorithmic Transparency in Public Sector 🇪🇺 EU Bodies Address AI Regulation and Data Privacy Challenges 🇺🇸 White House Announces $100M for Public Interest Tech; FCC Targets AI Robocalls 🇹🇼 Taiwan Proposes AI Law Promoting Innovation and Human Rights 🇨🇳 UN Adopts China-Sponsored AI Resolution, Backed by US 🇷🇺 Russia Enacts Law Mandating AI Risk Insurance 🗣 CAIDP Advocates for Ethical AI Use in California Employment 🌐 UNESCO Report Addresses Critical AI and Democracy Challenges Council of Europe #uk GPAI European Data Protection Board CNIL - Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés #dpa The White House #taiwan United Nations UNESCO #russia California Civil Rights Department #aigovernance #transparency #democracy #accountability Evelina Ayrapetyan Merve Hickok
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
📢 CAIDP Update 6.05 - AI Policy News (Feb. 5, 2024) - CAIDP AI Policy Leader Awards - Nominations Open. Deadline: Feb. 15, 2023 Submit nominations here: caidp.org/awards/ - EU Member States Unanimously Approve AI Act - White House Reports on AI Executive Order Implementation - AI Lobbying in the US Surges 185% Amid Calls for Regulation - Italian Regulator Notifies OpenAI of GDPR Violations - Privacy Data 2024: Rallying for a Comprehensive AI Treaty to Safeguard Fundamental Rights - Ukraine Release AI Media Guidelines - CAIDP Provides Comments on NIST Risk Management Framework - CAIDP Urges US Congress to Strengthen AI Oversight in the Housing Sector - CAIDP Endorses AI Environmental Impacts Act of 2024 - CAIDP Urges US Senate to Act on Big Tech and Child Exploitation Crisis - CAIDP President Merve Hickok to speak at UNESCO Global Forum on the Ethics of AI 2024 #aigovernance Council of the European Union The White House The Italian Data Protection Authority CPDP Conferences Council of Europe #ukraine National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
A short summary on what's going on with AI Safety regulation right now based on some insightful questions at the OWASP® Foundation Vancouver event last night: 🇪🇺 EU: The EU is by far the closest to enacting #AI legislation but lately it seems that big Tech are lobbying hard for minimal regulation on their models and harsher regulation on open source models. More info: https://lnkd.in/gtdMBrFM 🇺🇸 USA: The USA is getting their act together but is more fractured right now. Biden has signed an Executive order but the real push is coming from NIST and CISA on defining roadmaps and guidelines. More info: https://lnkd.in/gmt6_bqm 🇨🇦 Canada: Oh Canada... <sigh> we're so behind it's not even funny. The AIDA act is moving along. Mostly focused on non-discrimination, but isn't expected to become law until 2025 or later. Currently everything is still in Standing Committees on Parliament hill. Latest: https://lnkd.in/greB5dR7 #aisecurity #airegulation #cisa #euaiact #aida #executiveorder #opensource #opensourceai #ArtificialIntelligence #AILegislation #GlobalTechPolicy #EUPolicy #USAPolicy #CanadaTech
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Canada just signed the Council of Europe’s AI treaty, along with 10 other non-EU members, including the United States. It is the first binding international Artificial Intelligence treaty, different from the EU’s AI Act. Amalia brings up a great point in her post: Why are we binding to this treaty when we have outdated privacy legislation and no Arificial Intelligence legislation currently in place? Perhaps this commitment will at least expedite the passing of Canada’s Artificial Intelligence and Data Act.
I build privacy management programs| AI & Certified Privacy Engineer| Lecturer, Instructor and Advisor| University of Toronto School of Continuing Studies| Privacy Coach at DesigningPrivacy Canada| Opinions are my own
Soooo...it's Friday and as "per usual" I have something light to share with you (yeah, just kidding!) The first international treaty on artificial intelligence (hashtag #AI ) was adopted today by the Council of Europe. The official text is here ....https://lnkd.in/dUeNMDiY.... Canada is one of the 11 signatories, alongside US and Israel. Thank you Bogdan Manolea for signaling this development. What I don't understand is : Canada has a 22+ year old Federal Privacy Law for the Private Sector and a draft Bill C-27 and a draft Artificial Intelligence Act that has travelled more than I in the last 3 years ....So how can we sign up to protect human rights and guard against the evils of Artificial Intelligence without any legislation to rely on?/ Like I said, it's Friday - and we only talk about "light" stuff 😃 https://lnkd.in/gZ7dmCks #treaty #ai #artificialintelligence #international #canada #us #development #pipeda #aida #billc27 #friday
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Public Technologist, Evaluator / Fmr. Ministry Advisor, Tech & Science Envoy / @EU_Commission projects / EU-MENA-US / Atlantic Dialogue / Commentary and policy requests - below
With the growing number of concerns and debates on GenAI through the lens of national security and sovereignty, On February 29, I will join the GenAI Summit and panel "GenAI: Policy Making, Public Discourse and Geopolitics" where I will reflect on: ▪️ the Commission's and evaluators cooperation on AI Act, GenAI regulation, its geopolitical implications, national security and sovereignty, online safety and vulnerable groups protection frameworks, cross-region work on cases and scenarios, group-specific effects, risks and measures, safety authorities and coordinators, inc. counterparts in North America, MENA region, etc; ▪️ the effects of Gen AI on public governance and digital citizen scheme, including the Commission's AI@EC Communication plan; ▪️ the potential of LLM to affect public, accessibility and assistive technologies, designated groups (including the upcoming Accessibility Act); ▪️ safety and protection guardrails behind it, algorithmic and non-algorithmic legislation (e.g. equality frameworks). You may join us here - https://lnkd.in/eXJnBzhD with Dr. Haris Lambropoulos Panagiotis Gouvas Alex Eleftheriadis Dr. Maria-Oraiozili Koutsoupia Kostas Argyropoulos Fotis Draganidis Sasha Rubel Yiorgos Nikoletakis Yiannis Stamatonikolos #ai #ethics #policy
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Last Thursday I gave a talk on AI governance at the SMU School of Law, including how countries converge and diverge on data governance issues in AI – thank you A/Prof Han-Wei L. for the invite! 3 thoughts to share: 1) “Interoperability” – many guidelines and frameworks from countries (e.g. Singapore, EU, Canada, US) and international organisations (e.g. OECD) reference this term but what does it mean? I’ve yet to find a definition/state where AI governance frameworks are said to be interoperable, but bearing in mind that the goal is "harmonisation of international AI governance frameworks to reduce industry’s cost to meet multiple requirements" (per SG’s IMDA and the USA’s NIST in the joint mapping exercise between Singapore's AI Verify and USA's AI Risk Management Framework) – perhaps interoperability will be achieved only at a granular level in the form of what steps must be taken and how to measure whether those steps have actually been taken, than at a high-level principles approach (e.g. fairness, explainability, transparency, safety). I’m excited that Singapore has just mapped AI Verify with ISO/IEC 42001:2023 as well! Perhaps 'interoperability' will be through international standards (as they may be more readily adopted by countries than the standards of another country). 2) At the same time, standards and testing metrics must also take into account the unique socio-economic climate of each country. Singapore’s ‘Cataloguing LLM Evaluations Paper’ notes that the present framing of toxicity, bias and demographic considerations in LLM evaluations tends to be Western-centric. The KoBBQ paper (May 2024) also notes that the effectiveness of tests to assess social biases of LLMs depends on the cultural context – e.g. drug-use is associated with low SES in some countries, but with high SES in Korea. 3) An interesting divergence is in copyright over AI-generated output – the US Copyright Review Board in Jason Allen’s case said ‘no’ because having to prompt 624 times before receiving a satisfactory image shows how ‘random’ the output is such that the style and other elements of authorship are determined by the AI system and not the human. In contrast, the Beijing Internet Court in Li v Liu (where the plaintiff had ~20 prompts for what he wanted (‘Japan idol’, ‘reddish-brown plaits hairs’) and ~120 prompts for what he did not want (‘closed eyes’)) found that this reflected his “aesthetic choice and personal judgment” and copyright subsisted. Our IPOS x SMU Landscape Report characterizes these decisions as the debate evolving beyond a fact-centric question of how much human input and control is needed to “a question of the fundamental concept of originality to attribute human ownership”. I agree, but personally think the outcome could also be driven by pragmatism – in the Allen case the plaintiff ‘won a prize’ and merely sought to register his copyright, but in Li the plaintiff ‘was plagiarized’ so a remedy would be necessary.
Last week, we had an engaging talk by Cheryl Seah, a leading practitioner in data governance and law and tech from Drew & Napier LLC, on ‘𝐀𝐈 𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞: 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫����𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲’. Cheryl delved into the ASEAN approach to AI and how it measures up to global AI governance standards, with a spotlight on new developments in AI copyright issues. The session was insightfully moderated by CAIDG's Associate Prof. Han-Wei L.. We thank Josh Lee Kok Thong, CAIDG Research Affiliate and Future of Privacy Forum’s Managing Director of APAC, for sharing his hands-on experience in AI governance from a policymaking perspective earlier this semester, providing valuable insights amid the changing geopolitical landscape. #DataGovernance #AIGovernance #Internationality #Interoperability
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
State Department employs AI to declassify diplomatic cables from 1997 #AI #AItechnology #artificialintelligence #costeffectivesolution #declassifydiplomaticcables #FOIA #Government #governmentoperations #llm #machinelearning #machinelearningtool #proactivedisclosure #StateDepartment #technologyadoption #Transparency
State Department employs AI to declassify diplomatic cables from 1997
https://multiplatform.ai
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
📢 CAIDP Update 6.12 - AI Policy News (March 25, 2024) 🏛 CAIDP AI Policy Roundtable with Merve Hickok, Guido Scorza, Karine Caunes, Lorraine Kisselburgh, Linda Bonyo, Anu Bradford, Gabriela Ramos, Amba Kak, Sara Meyer-Davis, Elham Tabassi- April 4 🎓 CAIDP Graduation with Alondra Nelson - April 8 - U.N. Unanimously Adopts Landmark AI Governance Resolution - Council of Europe Shares Draft for International AI Treaty 🇪🇺 EU Addresses AI Ethical, Legal, and Transparency Challenges 🇫🇷 French Competition Authority Fines Google €250M for Breaching Commitments 🇮🇳 India Crafts Cybersecurity and Privacy Guidelines for AI in Business 🇺🇸 U.S. Tackles AI Challenges through Legislation and Diplomacy 🇧🇷 Brazilian Bill Proposes Allowing AI Systems to Hold Patents for Autonomous Inventions - CAIDP Advocates for Strengthened AI Policy and Oversight in Congress #aigovernance #cybersecurity #competion #research #aitreaty United Nations Council of Europe European Union #france #india #unitedstates #Brazil
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🌐 NATO and Artificial Intelligence: Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities As the General Rapporteur on AI for the STC committee of NATO Parliamentary Assembly I drafted a report with the subject that AI is transforming how wars are fought, presenting both opportunities and challenges. It's crucial to master the balancing act of leveraging AI while addressing ethical and legal concerns. AI-powered systems can revolutionize decision-making, autonomous systems, and cyber defense, but effective human-machine interaction is key. We need to adjust procurement processes to keep pace with AI innovations as traditional methods lag behind the rapid advancements made by non-defense industry players. AI raises fundamental ethical and legal questions, especially regarding lethal autonomous systems and international humanitarian law. We must address these to ensure lawful and ethical AI use. NATO has made strides with its AI Strategy and Principles of Responsible Use for AI in Defense. It's a leader in promoting ethical AI in the military. The U.S., France, Germany, Türkiye, and the UK are advancing AI for military use. Cooperation among allies is vital to harmonize efforts and standards. As AI adoption in militaries becomes irreversible, we must navigate its integration carefully to ensure it benefits our defense capabilities without compromising ethics. Six Recommendations for NATO and AI: 1️⃣ Raise Awareness: Enhance the legitimacy and acceptance of increased AI investments through public awareness campaigns. 2️⃣ Balance Ethics and Military Needs: Develop regulations that balance ethical commitments with military necessities. 3️⃣ Update Strategies: Regularly review and harmonize AI strategies across NATO and its allies. Utilize vast networks of relevant agencies and institutions. 4️⃣ Foster Innovation: Build on initiatives like the NATO Innovation Fund and DIANA. Cooperate with AI-related start-ups to bring cutting-edge technology to our armed forces. 5️⃣ Enhance Cooperation: Strengthen collaboration with the EU and other partners. Establish a structured dialogue on AI to ensure coherent efforts. 6️⃣ Develop Standards: Continue developing and adhering to the highest ethical standards for AI use. Engage with external actors to reach universally agreed-upon standards. ➡️ We as NATO Parliamentarians have a crucial role to play in implementing these recommendations. Let's ensure we take this role seriously for the benefit of our alliance and global security. #NATO #AI #Technology #Defense #Innovation #Ethics #Cooperation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Founder Web3-Blockchain startup *2 | Xperimental Economist | DeFi | Banking | Regulation | Crypto | Policy | AI Regulation | Startup Mentor | Founder Crypto Research Regulation Lab | Female Founders Blockchain Tech
Bridging the #AIPrivacy Divide: OECD’s Call for Global Cooperation The intertwining of artificial intelligence and privacy governance is fast becoming one of the most pressing issues of our time. Recent advancements, particularly in generative AI, have triggered a cascade of questions regarding data governance and privacy. Yet, AI and privacy policy communities frequently operate in isolation, leading to divergent approaches across different jurisdictions and legal systems. This fragmentation not only generates misunderstandings and complicates regulatory compliance and enforcement but also hinders the identification and leveraging of commonalities between national frameworks. The OECD's latest report “AI, data governance and privacy, Synergies and areas of international co-operation“ delves into these privacy risks and opportunities, mapping the OECD Privacy Guidelines to the OECD AI Principles. This document meticulously takes stock of various national and regional initiatives, highlighting potential areas for international collaboration. What stands out in this report is its call for a cohesive, globally harmonized approach. The OECD emphasizes the critical need for international cooperation to guide the development of AI systems that are both privacy-respectful and privacy-supportive. By advocating for the implementation of the OECD Privacy Guidelines in conjunction with the OECD AI Principles, the report provides a robust framework for nations to align their regulatory strategies. Such a unified approach is not only crucial for mitigating the privacy risks posed by AI but also for harnessing its potential benefits. The OECD's vision underscores the importance of breaking down silos and fostering a collaborative global environment to address the complex challenges at the intersection of AI and privacy governance. #AI #Privacy #DataGovernance #OECD #GenerativeAI #RegulatoryCompliance #InternationalCooperation #TechPolicy #PrivacyRisks #AIPrinciples - - - - - - - - 🗞I'm Panagiota Stamos, Editor of "the future of money" newsletter, sharing updates on digital finance and AI regulations on LinkedIn before our launch—connect with me Panagiota Stamos Psichis for a sneak peek and to be the first to know when our inaugural issue is out! 🤝 Subscribe: “https://lnkd.in/dpP4mKVu
To view or add a comment, sign in
-