A federal judge dismissed the case accusing Donald Trump of mishandling classified information, finding that the appointment of the special counsel leading it was unconstitutional. The remarkable twist, two days after Trump narrowly survived an assassination attempt, caps a series of recent legal wins in the criminal cases against him. His biggest victory: a blockbuster US Supreme Court decision that presidents are at least partly immune from prosecution for official acts.
The dismissal, which the Justice Department is appealing, came shortly before Trump accepted the presidential nomination at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee. On top of the 78-year-old candidate’s defiant emergence from the shooting, and the tumult over Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the presidential race, it marks a period of Trump riding high legally and politically.
The Supreme Court ruled on the last day of its term that Trump enjoys immunity from prosecution for some official acts involving his alleged efforts to reverse the 2020 election result, all but ensuring that he won’t face trial in that case before November’s election. Should the former president return to the White House in January, there is a broad expectation that he would simply direct his Justice Department to drop the case.
In May Trump became the first former US president to be convicted, for falsifying business records to hide hush money payments to an adult film actress ahead of the 2016 election. But the sentencing in New York criminal court has been delayed until Sept. 18 because of the high court’s immunity decision. Even if the sentencing goes ahead, it isn’t clear whether Trump will get time behind bars – and even if he does, the billionaire may remain free during the lengthy appeals process.
Trump maintains all the cases against him are part of a partisan hit job to thwart his return to the White House.
Trump Trial Delays Cast Doubt on Verdicts Before Fall Election
The first criminal trial against the former president started on April 15, despite delays in other cases
Trump has been charged with mishandling classified documents and obstructing justice, but on July 15 the judge dismissed the case, finding that the appointment of the special counsel leading it was unconstitutional. The Justice Department is appealing the dismissal, but it is now all but certain that any trial wouldn’t take place before the November election.
Case Status:
Next steps: Justice Department to file brief arguing its appeal of dismissal.
Charges:42 counts: including willful retention of national defense information, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and making false statements.
Case Name: United States of America v. Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, and Carlos de Oliveira
Trump faces 40 felony charges. The most serious charge carries a penalty of up to 20 years in prison, but Trump likely would receive a lesser sentence.
The People Involved
Judge
Aileen Cannon
US District Judge
Prosecution
Jack Smith
Special Counsel
Defense
Donald J. Trump
Defendant
Carlos de Oliveira
Defendant: Mar-a-Lago property manager
Walt Nauta
Defendant: Former Mar-a-Lago valet
Todd Blanche
Defense Attorney
Christopher Kise
Defense Attorney
Criminal: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Trump has pleaded not guilty to four federal felony charges issued in August 2023 by a Washington, DC, grand jury for his efforts to try to overturn the results of the 2020 election. The case, being pressed by Special Counsel Jack Smith, is on hold while the Supreme Court considers his claim that he should be immune from prosecution because his actions before and during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol were within the bounds of his official duties as president. A three-judge panel with the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit denied Trump’s immunity claim in February. The high court will hear arguments April 25. The court said it plans to decide “whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.” It’s unclear when the court will rule on the case. If he loses, the trial can go forward. If he wins, the case likely will be dismissed.
Case Status:
Next steps: The case goes back to the district court to decide the extent of the claims that are off limits to prosecution.
Charges:Four felony counts: conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against voters’s rights.
Case Name: United States of America v. Donald J. Trump
Trump has pleaded not guilty to four federal felony charges issued in August 2023 by a Washington, DC, grand jury for his efforts to try to overturn the results of the 2020 election. The case, being pressed by Special Counsel Jack Smith, is on hold while the Supreme Court considers his claim that he should be immune from prosecution because his actions before and during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol were within the bounds of his official duties as president. A three-judge panel with the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit denied Trump’s immunity claim in February. The high court will hear arguments April 25. The court said it plans to decide “whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.” It’s unclear when the court will rule on the case. If he loses, the trial can go forward. If he wins, the case likely will be dismissed.
Trump was found guilty on May 30, a stunning verdict that makes him the first former US president to be convicted of crimes. The New York jury convicted him on all 34 counts of falsifying business records to conceal a payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels just before the 2016 election. The payment was to bury her account of a sexual encounter years earlier, in a conspiracy that prosecutors said deprived voters of vital information. The presumed Republican nominee for November’s presidential election, Trump is set to be sentenced on Sept. 18. Trump, who has repeatedly attacked the case as Democratic election interference and who denies the encounter, could get as many as four years behind bars if he draws a prison term. But he is certain to appeal the verdict and may remain free during that lengthy process.
Case Status:
Next steps: Sentencing and likely appeal.
Charges:34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal damaging information.
Count
Verdict
Detail
1
Guilty
Invoice
2
Guilty
Ledger entry
3
Guilty
Ledger entry
4
Guilty
Check
5
Guilty
Invoice
6
Guilty
Ledger entry
7
Guilty
Check
8
Guilty
Invoice
9
Guilty
Ledger entry
10
Guilty
Check
11
Guilty
Invoice
12
Guilty
Ledger entry
13
Guilty
Check
14
Guilty
Invoice
15
Guilty
Ledger entry
16
Guilty
Check
17
Guilty
Invoice
18
Guilty
Ledger entry
19
Guilty
Check
20
Guilty
Invoice
21
Guilty
Ledger entry
22
Guilty
Check
23
Guilty
Invoice
24
Guilty
Ledger entry
25
Guilty
Check
26
Guilty
Invoice
27
Guilty
Ledger entry
28
Guilty
Check
29
Guilty
Invoice
30
Guilty
Ledger entry
31
Guilty
Check
32
Guilty
Invoice
33
Guilty
Ledger entry
34
Guilty
Check
Case Name: People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump
Trump faces a criminal trial for allegedly engaging in a scheme to identify, buy and bury negative information about him to boost his prospects of winning the presidency in 2016. His former lawyer Michael Cohen is expected to be the trial’s star witness in a case in which the Manhattan state prosecutors allege the former president directed his then-lawyer to pay adult film actress Stormy Daniels $130,000 to buy her silence and later claimed it as legal expenses. He’s also accused of making two other payments to bury negative news. The case is considered the least compelling but as a state prosecution, Trump cannot pardon himself if he’s convicted and wins re-election.
A New York appeals court agreed to slash Trump’s bond by about two thirds to $175 million while he appeals the verdict, throwing him a financial lifeline as the state prepared to start seizing his assets. He posted the bond on April 1, and now New York Attorney General Letitia James wants proof the bond company could pay up. In September 2022 she accused Trump, his company and two sons of inflating the value of assets by as much as $3.6 billion a year to get better terms on loans, allowing him to reap hundreds of millions of dollars in “illegal profit” over more than a decade. She won a $454 million verdict.
Case Status:
Next steps: The judge has set an April 22 hearing on the bond dispute. Meanwhile Trump can pursue his appeal of the verdict without the risk that James will seize his assets for lack of payment.
Charges:7 counts including fraud, issuing false business records and conspiracy.
Case Name: People of the State of New York v. Trump
On Feb. 16, Justice Arthur Engoron in Manhattan ordered Trump to pay $454 million for exaggerating the value of his assets by as much as $3.6 billion a year to get better terms on loans for more than a decade. Trump was also barred from running a New York-based business for three years, while his sons Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. were banned for two years. Engoron issued the verdict after holding an 11-week non-jury trial in which Trump, his children and several of his current and former employees and accountants testified. The former president is appealing the verdict, but still faces a March 25 deadline to post a bond for at least the full amount of the verdict while he appeals. Trump has said the requirement could force him to sell some of his properties at a loss if it isn’t put on hold or reduced while he appeals.
The suit was a major victory for New York Attorney General Letitia James, an elected Democrat who filed the wide-ranging fraud suit following a three-year investigation into Trump’s asset valuations. Her probe kicked off after Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen publicly accused his ex-boss of financial misconduct, and Cohen was a star witness at the trial. The case zeroed in on Trump’s annual statements of financial condition, which he used in business transactions to illustrate for banks his vast wealth in a bid for lower interest rates. During the trial, James presented extensive evidence that Trump knowingly exaggerated the value of his top properties, from his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida to his Trump Tower penthouse apartment in Manhattan. Engoron held Trump liable for fraud before the trial, focusing the proceeding on six additional claims, including conspiracy to falsify business business records and financial statements. The defendants lost on all counts. The interest on Trump’s fine is increasing by about $112,000 every day until he pays. Trump is appealing.
Trump and 18 co-defendants were charged under Georgia law with a criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.
Case Status:
Next steps: Trump is seeking to appeal ruling that allowed District Attorney Fani Willis to stay on the case after he sought her ouster over her romance with lead prosecutor Nathan Wade. Wade has now stepped down.
Charges: The indictment charges 19 defendants including Trump with crimes including racketeering, false statements and writings, impersonating a public officer, conspiracy to commit computer theft, perjury and forgery. The judge has dismissed six counts, including three against Trump, but left the bulk of the sprawling indictment in place.
Case Name: State of Georgia v. Donald John Trump
Trump is accused of directing a conspiracy to overturn the election, including by spreading false conspiracy theories about voter fraud, pressuring state officials to overturn Joe Biden’s win in Georgia, and promoting a corrupt plan to win the state’s 16 Electoral College votes by appointing a slate of fake electors. He urged Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to “find” just enough votes to reverse his election loss in the state. Rudy Giuliani and others are charged with falsely accusing election worker Ruby Freeman and her daughter of scheming to undermine Trump as votes were being counted on Election Day. Several defendants are also charged with conspiring to breach election equipment in rural Coffee County, Georgia, and copying voter software and data. Four defendants have pleaded guilty: conservative lawyers Sidney Powell, Kenneth Chesebro, Jenna Elllis and Scott Hall, a Georgia bail bondsman.
New York writer E. Jean Carroll went public in 2019 with a claim that Trump sexually assaulted her in the 1990s, and she sued him for defamation after he issued statements from the White House publicly accusing her of fabricating the attack to sell a book.
Case Status:
Next steps: Awaiting Trump’s appeal brief.
Charges: Defamation.
Case Name: Carroll v. Trump
Trump secured a $91.6 million bond (110% of the verdict) to delay paying up while he appeals. New York writer E. Jean Carroll went public in 2019 with an explosive allegation that then-President Trump had raped her in an isolated dressing room in a luxury department store in Manhattan in 1996, after they ran into each other while shopping. In response, Trump issued statements from the White House accusing Carroll of fabricating the attack to sell a book and to hurt him politically. He also said she wasn’t his “type.” Those statements prompted Carroll to sue Trump for defamation in 2019, though the case was delayed for several years as Trump argued — unsuccessfully — that he couldn’t be sued over comments he issued while he was in the White House. The judge then held Trump liable for defamation before the trial, which took place in January 2024, and featured testimony from both Carroll and Trump. The jury focused only on damages, including compensatory damages to cover harm to Carroll’s reputation, and punitive damages to punish Trump for his conduct. Trump has filed a notice of appeal and has called the verdict “excessive.”
New York writer E. Jean Carroll sued Trump in 2022 under a new state law that temporarily lifted the statute of limitations on civil sexual-assault claims. The suit, alleging Trump raped Carroll in the 1990s, also included a defamation claim related to a post by Trump on social media. It was Carroll’s second suit against Trump, but it went to trial first.
Case Status:
Next steps: Trump has appealed.
Charges: Battery, defamation.
Case Name: Carroll v. Trump
New York writer E. Jean Carroll won two lawsuits against Donald Trump in less than a year, both of which relate to her claim that the billionaire sexually assaulted her in a department store dressing room in Manhattan in the 1990s and defamed her by calling her a liar after she went public with her allegation in 2019. The 2022 sexual assault case was the second suit she filed but was the first to go to trial. In May 2023, a federal jury in Manhattan ordered Trump to pay Carroll $5 million in damages after finding him liable for sexual abuse stemming from the 1990s assault and defamation over a statement Trump made about Carroll on social media in 2022. She brought the suit under a new state law that temporarily allowed older sexual assault claims to be filed. In the statement, Trump accused Carroll of fabricating the attack to sell a book and to hurt him politically. The verdict was handed down less than a year before Carroll was awarded $83.3 million in her other suit against Trump, a defamation case that focused on statements Trump issued about her from the White House. Trump is appealing both verdicts.
A group of voters in Colorado sued the state’s top election official and Trump to remove him from the ballot for allegedly inciting the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, citing a provision of the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment that bars some insurrectionists from office.
Case Status:
Next steps: US Supreme Court said Trump can appear on presidential ballots this year, overturning a Colorado Supreme Court decision.
Claims: Violating Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Case Name: Anderson v. Trump
Donald Trump asked the US Supreme Court to overturn a December ruling by Colorado’s Supreme Court that the 14th Amendment made Trump ineligible to return to the presidency. The former president urged the high court to declare that he did not take part in an insurrection by trying to overturn his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden, a push that culminated with a deadly riot at the US Capitol.
Maine and Illinois had also declared Trump ineligible. The nation’s highest court held oral arguments on Feb. 8, where the justices expressed skepticim about arguments that the 14th Amendment allows states to remove candidates from ballots. The justices ruled March 4 to keep Trump on the ballot.