![Kindle app logo image](https://cdn.statically.io/img/m.media-amazon.com/images/G/01/kindle/app/kindle-app-logo._CB668847749_.png)
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Great Stagnation: How America Ate All the Low-hanging Fruit of Modern History, Got Sick, and Will (Eventually) Feel Better Hardcover – June 9, 2011
- Print length128 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherDutton
- Publication dateJune 9, 2011
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.5 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100525952713
- ISBN-13978-0525952718
Customers who bought this item also bought
- The Complacent Class: The Self-Defeating Quest for the American DreamPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Aug 11
- Stubborn Attachments: A Vision for a Society of Free, Prosperous, and Responsible IndividualsHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Aug 11
- Average Is Over: Powering America Beyond the Age of the Great StagnationPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Wednesday, Aug 14Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
- Talent: How to Identify Energizers, Creatives, and Winners Around the WorldHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Aug 12Only 17 left in stock - order soon.
- Create Your Own Economy: The Path to Prosperity in a Disordered WorldHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Aug 13Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
- Where Is My Flying Car?HardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Sunday, Aug 11
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Dutton; Eventually edition (June 9, 2011)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 128 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0525952713
- ISBN-13 : 978-0525952718
- Item Weight : 8 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.5 x 8 inches
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
![Tyler Cowen](https://cdn.statically.io/img/m.media-amazon.com/images/I/01Kv-W2ysOL._SY600_.png)
Tyler Cowen (/ˈkaʊ.ən/; born January 21, 1962) is an American economist, academic, and writer. He occupies the Holbert L. Harris Chair of economics, as a professor at George Mason University, and is co-author, with Alex Tabarrok, of the popular economics blog Marginal Revolution. Cowen and Tabarrok have also ventured into online education by starting Marginal Revolution University. He currently writes a regular column for Bloomberg View. He also has written for such publications as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Time, Wired, Newsweek, and the Wilson Quarterly. Cowen also serves as faculty director of George Mason's Mercatus Center, a university research center that focuses on the market economy. In February 2011, Cowen received a nomination as one of the most influential economists in the last decade in a survey by The Economist. He was ranked #72 among the "Top 100 Global Thinkers" in 2011 by Foreign Policy Magazine "for finding markets in everything."
Bio from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the writing quality straightforward and understandable. They also describe the writing style as interesting, easy to read, and cogent. Readers mention the book is short and technical. However, some feel the economic growth and sturdiness are slowing down and untenable in the long term.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the writing quality of the book good, easy to understand, and clear. They also say it provides an accessible synthesis of the latest statistics and academic research. Readers also say the overall theory is interesting, but they were hoping for more meat. Overall, they say the book is short and doesn't take too long to read.
"...His writing about the Internet, and its effect on GDP, also is insightful and important...." Read more
"...b. Promotes self-education; a lot better than watching TV.......c. These should all yield productivity gains.....3...." Read more
"...This book is as clearly written as I had hoped. I don't want to ruin the juicy bits of his thesis so let me cloak it in a big simile...." Read more
"...about economic growth, income and innovation in a clear, persuasive style using simple examples and images...." Read more
Customers find the writing style interesting, quick, and filled with ideas. They also say the author does an excellent job in simple language and the book is provocative and powerful. Readers also say it's well worth buying.
"This is a wonderful mini-book reflecting on the slowing pace of technological process, how US economic growth has changed as a result, and what that..." Read more
"...But, taken with a grain of salt, this is a good read that will add nuance to your understanding of current economic affairs...." Read more
"...of the internet and the financial crisis to be original and insightful...." Read more
"The initial notion of this book is interesting: that we saw the big, world-changing innovations before the 1970s, that we've been benefiting from..." Read more
Customers find the book short and easy to read. They also say the simplicity and brevity are part of the appeal.
"...This book's simplicity and brevity are part of its appeal. But it deserves a longer final chapter...." Read more
"...primer in the social and economic reasons for our decline, this is a short, easy to read book which will help you understand why, without major..." Read more
"It's short, it doesn't take too long to read and it is technical enough but not overly technical whereby I would throw away the book...." Read more
"Even if you do not normally read about economics, this short, easily-digested book should be of interest...." Read more
Customers like the ideological content of the book. They say it has no obvious partisan or ideological bias.
"...Cowen leans conservative/libertarian but there was no obvious partisan or ideological bias in The Great Stagnation...." Read more
"...It is a concise and apolitical review of the current economic climate in America, and it's not as gloomy as the title of the book might suggest...." Read more
"...It is devoid of left or right wing biases and strives to present the author's analysis in a non-partisan manner...." Read more
Customers find the book's economic growth argument to be short on specific solutions. They also say the rate of technological innovation has slowed down.
"...1. Innovation is getting harder; the low fruit has been picked.....2. Recent innovations have slight marginal benefits....." Read more
"...Unfortunately, breakthroughs don't come very often, and can't be planned for...." Read more
"...Basically, he argues that because economic growth has stagnated, we can't afford the tax cuts that the right typically calls for and we can't..." Read more
"...The most convincing part of the book is the claim that productivity growth has slowed because the government's share of GDP has increased...." Read more
Customers find the right-wing approach untenable in the long term, the prediction of prolonged stagnation is not convincing, and the recommendations for the future are weak. They also say the book has not aged well.
"...C. Tax cuts without spending cuts (right wing approach) are untenable in the long term......" Read more
"...state of affairs in innovation is very revealing, his recommendations for the future are weak...." Read more
"...[...]. Indeed the entire Bushian mythology of "old Europe" is fatally flawed and serves the interests of a failing US status quo...." Read more
"...The prediction of a prolonged stagnation is not convincing. The prescriptions are even weaker: Raise social status of scientists?..." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
He raises interesting points about the productivity growth of the last 30 years: that, really, neither labor nor capital has gotten much richer, so maybe productivity didn't improve that much after all?; and that much of the productivity gains in recent years have come from producing the same amount (or close to it) with fewer people, rather than doing more with the same workforce.
And his thesis about economic growth being perhaps overstated...due to fast growth in sectors--education, health care, government--where expenditures are valued at cost rather than reflecting a market price...rings very true to me. He points out that schools today have MUCH better facilities than they did 40 years ago, and all of that shows up in published GDP numbers--but what is the true benefit of such? Or of highways, unnecessary doctor visits, etc.
His writing about the Internet, and its effect on GDP, also is insightful and important. That is, quality of life has improved in meaningful ways that are destructive to GDP: using wikipedia instead of buying a dictionary, posting on Internet bulletin boards rather than paying to go to the dance hall, etc. Certainly I would spend more than $20/month on movie theaters/rentals if Netflix weren't available. But it is, so I almost never go to the theater, and spend less on rentals than I would have 10 years ago. The immense value--if unmeasured--of the Internet means that GDP/income may be less relevant to quality of life than they used to be. However, our fiscal obligations can't be funded with improved quality of life, so reconciling a slower pace of economic growth with liabilities will be very difficult--especially given that, at present, we don't even really acknowledge the underlying problem. Cowen raises an interesting contrast with Europe, which--perhaps due to WWII--doesn't have the same experience with all their wants being fulfilled.
I have often thought about how different basic science was for the 'average' educated person during the Enlightenment...that a reasonably educated and curious person could do basic experiments and still incrementally advance general human knowledge of the world in which we live. And this essay basically says, yes, society benefited greatly from science's the low barrier to entry from the 1500s-1900s, but we've now fully depreciated the value of those discoveries made in more benighted times and are not coming up with new 'foundation' innovations on which future improvements in public good can be built. So "The Great Stagnation" isn't a stagnation in fiscal terms, but in scientific capital. It is also a failure inherent in the shift toward the privatization of scientific advancement and discovery...think drug patents, financial derivatives, etc.
I'm not sure I totally buy his arguments on how we are currently overestimating GDP in this country. But I can't disassemble and critique those arguments either, so it's a point of view I'll look for more reinforcement (or refutation of) in other texts. (A caveat: I'm relatively new to reading economics literature, so if you're read a tonne of books on this topic keep that bias of mine in mind.) I do however, intuitively agree that we are not truly seeing the full value of the internet yet, so perhaps this is the innovation on which future innovations in the public good can be based. I'm not sure Cowen feels like that's happening yet, but I feel like we're starting to see that.
While I don't think this is anywhere close to the definitive statement on our current economic malaise, I do think this quick read will give you good food for thought that supplements other books and articles.
How I score:
5 Stars: Transformative, I have seen 'the matrix' in a whole new light
4 Stars: Thought provoking, worth you time but read critically
3 Stars: Some interesting ideas but also some flaws, I probably finished it out of obligation
2 Stars: Meh, if I finished the book it was because I told someone I would
1 Star: #Fail, I didn't bother to finish it
Top reviews from other countries
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/amazon-avatars-global/default._CR0,0,1024,1024_SX48_.png)
- Our sense of how well off we are in the developed world is warped by 1) past growth that just isn’t there anymore and 2) the illusion that the rising value of our homes is increasing our wealth and we thus keep spending money we don’t actually have, because no actual value is being created.
- Real wealth and growth comes from scientific and technological breakthroughs that actually create value and cause the economy to rapidly expand and result in more people doing high-value work. Unfortunately, recently we haven’t had any major scientific and technological breakthroughs and the Internet businesses don’t actually contribute that much to the economy and they employ very few people compared to the size of the population.
- The education system is not working and our rates of illiteracy, high school dropouts, etc., are increasing. Furthermore, our society doesn’t value science and scientists and thus there is little incentive for our brightest minds to go into science when they could spend less effort, earn more money, and get higher social status elsewhere.
The book may seem like a downer, but Tyler Cowen is no pessimist. His message is that we absolutely can turn things around, we just need to start prioritizing correctly and get out of our comfort zones and stop being complacent. This message is still as relevant in 2021 as it was ten years ago.
Reading this book made me feel more motivated and energized. And I think that was exactly what Tyler Cowen was trying to accomplish by writing it — well done!
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/amazon-avatars-global/a5930432-ed79-45d6-9e9d-b802dd8f5082._CR62,0,375,375_SX48_.jpg)
![](https://images-eu.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/amazon-avatars-global/default._CR0,0,1024,1024_SX48_.png)
We had same situation earlier, however, history showed the betrayal of all the worries raised by the intelligentias then.
![](https://images-eu.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/amazon-avatars-global/default._CR0,0,1024,1024_SX48_.png)
![](https://images-eu.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/amazon-avatars-global/default._CR0,0,1024,1024_SX48_.png)
Looking back from today Cowen assesses past inventions and their subsequent successful commercialization as low hanging fruit, which to my opinion is misleading. Achieving innovation in the past was as difficult as it is today. Inventions have been made during all centuries all over the planet and it took entrepreneurs to turn those inventions into great innovations that produced income and improved the world we live in. All nations had their share here. But it is also true that great inventive nations can falter and lose their place at the top (e.g. the Roman Empire or China).
All other aliments mentioned by Cowen are those of any Western Nation: education and school curriculum, health care, government involvement.
What is true is that today we have a global market, global competition and a global continuous quest for new products, services and processes.
True is also, that the key for success in today`s postindustrial world today is knowledge and creativity.
All Asian nations have understood this since antiquity (at least since Confucius times) and they know, that and prosperity for the individual lies with social advancement and social advancement can be achieved with higher education aka knowledge.
While even former seemingly great innovative nations like Japan don't offer any answers on the above questions now (and probably never had them) other nations like Korea show some interesting concepts and planning. On a global scale there is no stagnation, only wealth is produced also in some other parts of the world and we have to accept the challenges to stay competitive.