Home Platforms Meta’s Stock Spikes After Q4 Report, But Its Results Are A Mixed Bag

Meta’s Stock Spikes After Q4 Report, But Its Results Are A Mixed Bag

SHARE:
Meta's earning
Cracow, Poland - October 29, 2021: Mark Zuckerberg announced facebook logo change to meta and creates metaversum that integrates services. Brand change concept on smartphone and computer monitor.

2022 was a no good, very bad year for Meta’s stock. It was the year Meta reported its first-ever revenue decline.

But shares soared by more than 30% in after-hours trading on Wednesday, following Meta’s Q4 2022 earnings report, which beat the street’s revenue expectations.

Although that is not to say Meta grew its revenue, either overall or on a quarterly YoY basis.

Meta’s total revenue for 2022 was $116.6 billion, down 1% YoY. Revenue for the quarter was $32.2 billion, down 4% YoY. (Ad revenue for Q4 was $31.3 billion, also down 4% from the year-ago quarter.)

Still, investors rewarded Meta for its stated management theme for 2023, which Mark Zuckerberg pledged will be a “year of efficiency.”

Year of the water rabbit efficiency

Although Zuckerberg alluded to the metaverse, Quest Pro and Reality Labs during the Q4 call, his main focus was on streamlining the company and boosting business performance.

In addition to laying off 11,000 employees late last year – roughly 13% of its workforce – Meta plans to flatten its org structure, cut “layers” of middle management, “be more proactive about cutting projects that aren’t performing or may no longer be as crucial” – and, perhaps most importantly, deploy AI tools to help its engineers be more productive, Zuckerberg said.

AI is also the driving force behind Meta’s ad performance tools, such as Advantage+, its investments in privacy-enhancing technologies and a discovery engine for content recommendation across Facebook and Instagram.

And then there’s Reels. Meta is laser-focused on improving monetization for its short-form video product, also known as its TikTok clone. More than 40% of Facebook and Instagram advertisers now use Reels across Meta’s apps, but Reels still monetizes at a lower rate than ads in feed.

“The more that Reels grows, even though it adds engagement to the system overall, it takes some time away from Feed, and we actually lose money,” Zuckerberg said.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

But Meta is making moves to improve Reels monetization efficiency on Facebook, which the company says has doubled over the past six months. “In terms of the revenue headwind [from Reels],” Zuckerberg said, “we’re still on track to be roughly neutral by the end of this year, maybe early next year.”

After that, Zuckerberg said he’s confident Meta will be in a position to profitably grow its Reels format.

For now, though, the overall number of ad impressions delivered across Meta’s family of apps increased by 23% year-over year in Q4, while the average price-per-ad decreased by 22% year-over-year. That shift was partially a reflection of engagement growth with surfaces that are still ramping up from a money-making perspective, like Reels.

Still blowing

But sticking with the topic of revenue headwinds, Meta is still dealing with the effects of Apple’s AppTrackingTransparency framework.

“There is still certainly an absolute headwind to our revenue numbers,” said Susan Li, Meta’s newly appointed CFO.

However, Meta is “lapping” the aftershocks of ATT’s rollout and adoption, she said.

“We are continuing to make progress and mitigating the impact from the ATT change,” Li said. “But, you know, this is more generally the reality of the online advertising environment that we operate in.”

You can say that again. Signal loss or, as Li referred to it at one point, the “signals landscape,” is an undeniable fact of life and of doing business (or trying to).

And beyond platform changes, regulators in Europe are also starting to take action.

In early January, European regulators ruled that Meta’s practice of using its terms of service to require people to consent to tracking for targeted advertising is illegal under GDPR.

This decision could mean Meta has to change its approach and rely on consent as its legal basis for targeted advertising.

Meta is, of course, appealing the ruling.

“We believe that our current approach is GDPR compliant,” Li said, “and … we don’t expect that those decisions are going to affect our ability to provide personalized advertising in the EU.”

Must Read

Cookie caption contest (we've got until 2024, folks)

Vendors Like RTB House And Raptive Bought Into The Privacy Sandbox. Do They Feel Burned?

For some, Chrome’s news that it’s keeping third-party cookies was a moment of vindication. But was it a cruel blow to partners that tested the Privacy Sandbox in good faith?

Comic: Surveillance Advertising

The FTC Orders Companies To Disclose Info On “Surveillance Pricing”

The FTC is ordering data from eight companies, which Commissioner Lina Khan describes as part of a “shadowy ecosystem of pricing middlemen,” in pursuit of visibility into “surveillance pricing.”

Privacy Theater

Alphabet Earnings Earn A Shrug From Investors, But Nobody Else Can Keep Up

Alphabet is so big that, even when it’s growing slowly – YouTube, for example, disappointed with a lower-than-expected growth rate – it’s still outpacing competitors.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: What's your pick?

Google Says It Won't Deprecate Cookies In Chrome After All (?!)

You read that headline right: Google is seriously considering scrapping its plans to deprecate third-party cookies in Chrome. Instead, it’s proposing some kind of TBD opt-out tool for third-party cookies.

Comic: An ID Bridge Too Far?

Programmatic Companies Wrestle With ID Bridging And What Counts As Fraud

In January, the Chrome browser removed third-party cookies for 1% of users, to facilitate testing of the Privacy Sandbox –  and a new controversy was born.

It’s Open Season On SaaS As Brands Confront Their Own Subscription Fatigue

For CFOs and CEOs, we’ve entered a kind of open hunting season on martech SaaS.