Home AdExchanger Talks Is The Alt Video Currency Juice Worth The Squeeze?

Is The Alt Video Currency Juice Worth The Squeeze?

SHARE:

Buyers and sellers are still at odds over alternative video currencies – hence the multiple (and ongoing) years of testing and learning.

While publishers and trade orgs are on a roll bestowing their stamps of approval upon newer currencies, some media buyers and working groups continue to voice concerns over transacting on data so different from that provided by the Nielsen panels that have supported TV ad buying for decades.

But what should advertisers make of all this turmoil?

The back and forth on certification and accreditation is separate from the fact that “alt currencies are ready to be used for [TV ad] transactions – period, full stop,” says Josh Chasin, VideoAmp’s former chief measurability officer, on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

Chasin, who left VideoAmp in January of this year, has also served as Comscore’s chief research officer and was at Arbitron before Nielsen acquired the consumer research company in 2012. He’s also a member of the Advertising Research Foundation’s board of advisors.

Buyers are using alt currencies today, Chasin says, but only up to a point. Adoption isn’t enough to topple Nielsen … yet.

One reason agencies are hesitant about alt currencies is because of FOFO: the fear of finding out. Larger data sets can help advertisers count more ad exposures than panels alone, which means media buyers will have to acknowledge to clients that some of their prior media planning may have been suboptimal. That can get pretty awkward.

Buyers are particularly uncomfortable transacting on larger data sets for linear buys, Chasin says. Unlike streaming, linear ad buying hinges on ratings based on demos, so moving to an alt currency with bigger data sets will have a more jarring impact on linear reports.


But make no mistake, he says. From advanced audiences to outcomes-based measurement, the alt currency juice is most certainly worth the squeeze.

The next hurdle is for broadcasters to get more agencies to buy in.

Also in this episode: Behind the buy-side push for show-level transparency, why audience panels are out and calibration panels are in, and what the term “big data” really means.

For more articles featuring Josh Chasin, click here.

Must Read

Comic: Surveillance Advertising

The FTC Orders Companies To Disclose Info On “Surveillance Pricing”

The FTC is ordering data from eight companies, which Commissioner Lina Khan describes as part of a “shadowy ecosystem of pricing middlemen,” in pursuit of visibility into “surveillance pricing.”

Privacy Theater

Alphabet Earnings Earn A Shrug From Investors, But Nobody Else Can Keep Up

Alphabet is so big that, even when it’s growing slowly – YouTube, for example, disappointed with a lower-than-expected growth rate – it’s still outpacing competitors.

Comic: What's your pick?

Google Says It Won't Deprecate Cookies In Chrome After All (?!)

You read that headline right: Google is seriously considering scrapping its plans to deprecate third-party cookies in Chrome. Instead, it’s proposing some kind of TBD opt-out tool for third-party cookies.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: An ID Bridge Too Far?

Programmatic Companies Wrestle With ID Bridging And What Counts As Fraud

In January, the Chrome browser removed third-party cookies for 1% of users, to facilitate testing of the Privacy Sandbox –  and a new controversy was born.

It’s Open Season On SaaS As Brands Confront Their Own Subscription Fatigue

For CFOs and CEOs, we’ve entered a kind of open hunting season on martech SaaS.

Brian Lesser Is The New Global CEO Of GroupM

If you were wondering whether Brian Lesser was planning to take some time off after handing the CEO reins of InfoSum to Lauren Wetzel last week – here’s your answer.