Hi there,
I see the confusion. Using “wpo” instead of “updraft” would probably be more appropriate.
Using the same as re-smushit might not be the right call, specially if both are in use. For example WP-Optimize enables you to delete the backups after some time. Having the same suffix would delete re-smushit backups as well, which wouldn’t be right.
Thanks for the suggestion!
Marc.
I see the confusion. Using “wpo” instead of “updraft” would probably be more appropriate.
yes definitely.
Using the same as re-smushit might not be the right call, specially if both are in use. For example WP-Optimize enables you to delete the backups after some time. Having the same suffix would delete re-smushit backups as well, which wouldn’t be right.
Ehr… I don’t agree: that would be exactly the beaviour I would expect.
You reason in terms of ‘plugin’, wpo vs resmushit, but I perceive (and I think the common man too) much more the service term “ReSmushit” no matter who is bringing it to the site.
I totally understand the coder’s perspective (I immediately understood what was going on) but I doubt it would be appreciated from most users.
Btw what about placing the backups in a subfolder?
(I also would like to keep the thumbnails segregated from the full size images but never found the right place to do make the suggestion to the wp-core (hints?))
Thank you