California Sen. Alex Padilla talks with South Bay International Wastewater Treatment Plant Area Operations Manager Morgan Rogers on June 5, 2023. The two overlook the overloaded primary treatment system.
California Sen. Alex Padilla talks with South Bay International Wastewater Treatment Plant Area Operations Manager Morgan Rogers on June 5, 2023. The two overlook the overloaded primary treatment system. / Photo by MacKenzie Elmer

A San Diego treatment plant at the U.S.-Mexico border is having a hard time cleaning Tijuana sewage before it contaminates the Pacific Ocean.  

That’s because parts of the plant are basically broken, which is not great news for beach communities waiting on the federal government to build a bigger, better plant with newly-promised funding from the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. It’s clear now that a large chunk of that money will be spent fixing parts of the old plant before building anything new.  

Some of the plant’s most critical equipment hasn’t been replaced since former Vice President Al Gore helped break ground on the South Bay International Wastewater Treatment plant in 1994.  

It was built to treat 25 million gallons of Tijuana sewage per day, pollution that would otherwise spill over the border into the Tijuana River and eventually the ocean, closing beaches up and down the coast. Today, the plant is often running on overdrive. There’s widespread acknowledgement that the government initially built a plant that was too small. But Congress put $300 million on the table in 2020 to double its size. 

The plant now needs about half that amount in repairs, according to a recent assessment of plant facilities. 

“I had sticker shock,” said Héctor Aguirre, assistant director of EPA’s regional water division, when he reflected on the depth of deferred maintenance. The EPA is in charge of the plant expansion project.  

Others were less surprised.  

“The Water Board has been shouting for people to pay attention to this for years,” said David Gibson, executive officer of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. “We’ve been very clear that $300 million wasn’t half of what was needed to do the job right.” 

The plant has a two-step treatment system and the first step is what’s not working. That’s called primary treatment, where solids like human waste, trash and sand or other large matter that make its way into wastewater settle-out and separate from liquids. But the tanks are so overrun, the end product of the plant is much like watery poo.  

The plant could only remove about 34 percent of the gunk in the water, according to an April water quality report. It should be hitting 85 percent to comply with the Clean Water Act.  

Other stuff is broken, too. For instance, the U.S. can’t control the flow of sewage into the treatment plant from Mexico because a valve is stuck open. The plant has racked up 218 related Water Quality Control Board violations since 2021. 

The city of Imperial Beach, San Diego’s southernmost town where beaches are polluted by Tijuana sewage most of the time, declared a state of emergency over the pollution on Jan. 6. 

The International Boundary and Water Commission – or IBWC, the federal agency that handles binational border water issues – built, owns and operates the South Bay plant among other infrastructure along the border. Its leader, Commissioner Maria-Elena Giner, appointed by President Joe Biden in 2021, revealed recently that her agency has documented $1 billion in things it needs to fix and build and only a $50 million budget to do it.  

IBWC spent less than $5 million on major maintenance at the South Bay plant over the last 15 years, Giner said. About 37 percent of the pipes, pumps and other sewage-separating infrastructure need immediate attention. 

“It’s not going to collapse. It’s in need of serious repairs,” Giner said in an interview with Voice of San Diego. 

That’s why Giner invited California Sen. Alex Padilla to tour South Bay’s huge, concrete vats of stagnant Tijuana sewage sitting in inoperable primary treatment tanks earlier this month. These tanks have filled up with so much sand and sediment that they need to be cleaned before they can function properly.  

International Boundary and Water Commission leader Maria Elena Giner talks with Sen. Alex Padilla atop the non-functioning primary treatment system at the South Bay International Wastewater Treatment Plant. EPA Regional 9 director Martha Guzman looks into the primary treatment vat.
International Boundary and Water Commission leader Maria-Elena Giner talks with Sen. Alex Padilla atop the non-functioning primary treatment system at the South Bay International Wastewater Treatment Plant. EPA Regional 9 director Martha Guzman looks into the primary treatment vat. / Photo by MacKenzie Elmer

Giner said Padilla is the first high-ranking official to visit South Bay since Gore. As the two walked the plank between the pungent primary treatment vats, Giner explained the state of disarray she inherited at IBWC two years ago.  

“There were spreadsheets all over the place. There wasn’t a work order system,” Giner said.  

In short, IBWC administrations past didn’t have a clear understanding of what infrastructure needed fixing and when. Giner said that when she took over, she visited all eight field offices from San Diego to Mercedes, Texas to take stock of all the maintenance needs. 

“People were stunned,” Giner said.  

While South Bay needs an alarming number of upgrades, there’s also a leaking dam in Del Rio, Texas, a $276 million project. It’s up to Congress to decide how much of the U.S. State Department budget goes toward the IBWC. Padilla called South Bay’s upgrades a top priority during his June visit.  

“Over the course of decades there has been vast insufficient operations funding that leads to conditions like this which are unacceptable,” Padilla said during a June press conference at the South Bay plant.  

Ginger said she hopes to direct some money in the IBWC budget toward fixing the South Bay plant’s primary treatment system. And, she’ll be testifying before the U.S. House of Representatives in July to make the case that IBWC needs help.  
 

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

  1. How much does the repair of this plant compare the retrofitting it as a pure water plant as they have in Miramar/San Diego? Thanks for working so hard to revitalize our water system! It is one step at a time to achieve sustainability.

  2. The comment
    “In short, IBWC administrations past didn’t have a clear understanding of what infrastructure needed fixing and when. Giner said that when she took over” that is a complete mischaracterization.

    The 2019 Arcadis report was exhaustive in detail of what needed to be done. It was commonly known 4 years ago that the IBWC plant equipment was being worked overtime and needed maintenance. Also, it seems that the Serge Didena coined term “crumbing infrastructure” is always cited, but it seems the actual reports of pipe breakages in Mexico are always related to construction crews somehow working on Sunday unintentionally breaking the pipe and not crumbling infrastructure.

    California political leaders are getting many photo opportunities and access to voice there outrage. The problem is the same as four years ago….they have no plan. These politicians do not have a clue or a long term plan to solve or manage the pollution from Mexico.

    Remember we had emergency declaration already, Nora Vargus had her TJ River Task force, Tijuana River Restoration plan, City of Imperial Beach sediment study and more have spent at least $15 million dollars on no less than 6 studies which do not have the basics of proper scientific environmental investigation. But at the same time the Non-profits who take the funding keep the misinformation campaign alive.

    Our government officials are like a group of comedy cops driving into a crime scene followed by the the Marks Brothers in their cars They jump out look around make photo opps for 5 minutes and rely on the Marks Brothers (who are SWIA, TRENNER, Wildcoast, surfrider, California Coastal Commission, State Lands Commission and the Coastal Conservancy) and the pay the Marks Brothers for inaccurate environmental reports. They pontificate and make grand statements. Then they get in their cars and drive off to North County with the Marks brothers following.

    Our California State political leadership, who took away federal oversight of the river, are now responsible to solve this sewage problem. Instead of following the plan they drink the cool aid from the same Mark brothers lawyers and land acquisition specialists who are dressed up like Preachers of Environmental Justice. The most important things these preachers lack is sound environmental management expertise and the lack of a proven track record of environmental restoration experience success. These groups, and subjective quasi scientific reports, have a perfect record in the last 30 years of striking out and failure so solve simple problems. These reports are funded by the State of California through the California Coastal Commission and the Coastal Conservancy.

    Here we go again with the Marks brothers…. shoot, ready, aim.

    Respects

    IB Farmer Leon.

    1. I think maybe something besides sewage is running thru those pipes, like drugs.

      It’s hard to see how this system is just so broken and nobody on the inside took any actions to fix it or do basic maintenance. It’s like the check engine oil light came on and no one did anything about it, just kept on driving.

  3. Pretending they can’t afford 300 million to fix infrastructure at the border, and that they care about working folks, as they blow 100 billion a year on killing people in Ukraine. Insane in the membrane.

  4. Hey, let’s try to work together and not disparage. We’ve got to get past the “enemy” mentality of Dems and Repubs and just get along to solve things. All of us are basically good people. This division scares the sh!t out of me. We want a clean ocean, let’s work together on without animosity. BTW, I never comment, this is a first.

Leave a comment
We expect all commenters to be constructive and civil. We reserve the right to delete comments without explanation. You are welcome to flag comments to us. You are welcome to submit an opinion piece for our editors to review.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.