Adding Webmention Features
Providing a Framework for Citation and Conversation
This week I cemented my awareness of the
. I remembered that awhile ago. But it never quite registered.My exploration began at IndieWeb’s
. And into the rabbit hole I tumbled.I followed Aaron Parecki’s Document Object Model (DOM 📖) classes to the HTML 📖 markup of my site.
blog post to first addI registered at the documentation, I added any takeonrules.com webmentions to an RSS feed. In other words, if you send me a webmention, it should show up in my RSS feed. (Sidenote: I’m still considering what to do with any mentions that I receive. )
to enable a Webmentions end-point for my site. FollowingWhy Does This Matter?
The Webmention standard defines a mechanism for me to “cite” your post and notify you of that citation. You may choose to show that I cited your post. Both of us retain authority over our writing. You can’t delete my post, because it is on my site. I can’t force you to show my post on your site.
This also means, we can have federated conversations without a reliance on a gated community. I remember all of the table-top Role Playing Game (RPG 📖) conversations on Google+. And because Google owned the platform of those conversations, when they shut Google+ down, we lost those conversations.
Webmention provides a mechanism for notifying each other when we link to each other. And allows us to each own our side of the conversation.
Post Script
I would appreciate someone mentioning this post via the Webmention standard. I’d like to add links back to those mentions, but need to see what I’m working with.
I added a build task to publish my webmentions via IndieWeb’s webmention gem.