Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs
- PMID: 15489352
- PMCID: PMC523567
- DOI: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004
Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs
Abstract
The etiology of nosocomial infections, the frequency of contaminated hands with the different nosocomial pathogens, and the role of health care workers' hands during outbreaks suggest that a hand hygiene preparation should at least have activity against bacteria, yeasts, and coated viruses. The importance of efficacy in choosing the right hand hygiene product is reflected in the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline on hand hygiene (J. M. Boyce and D. Pittet, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 51:1-45, 2002). The best antimicrobial efficacy can be achieved with ethanol (60 to 85%), isopropanol (60 to 80%), and n-propanol (60 to 80%). The activity is broad and immediate. Ethanol at high concentrations (e.g., 95%) is the most effective treatment against naked viruses, whereas n-propanol seems to be more effective against the resident bacterial flora. The combination of alcohols may have a synergistic effect. The antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine (2 to 4%) and triclosan (1 to 2%) is both lower and slower. Additionally, both agents have a risk of bacterial resistance, which is higher for chlorhexidine than triclosan. Their activity is often supported by the mechanical removal of pathogens during hand washing. Taking the antimicrobial efficacy and the mechanical removal together, they are still less effective than the alcohols. Plain soap and water has the lowest efficacy of all. In the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline, promotion of alcohol-based hand rubs containing various emollients instead of irritating soaps and detergents is one strategy to reduce skin damage, dryness, and irritation. Irritant contact dermatitis is highest with preparations containing 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, less frequent with nonantimicrobial soaps and preparations containing lower concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate, and lowest with well-formulated alcohol-based hand rubs containing emollients and other skin conditioners. Too few published data from comparative trials are available to reliably rank triclosan. Personnel should be reminded that it is neither necessary nor recommended to routinely wash hands after each application of an alcohol-based hand rub. Long-lasting improvement of compliance with hand hygiene protocols can be successful if an effective and accessible alcohol-based hand rub with a proven dermal tolerance and an excellent user acceptability is supplied, accompanied by education of health care workers and promotion of the use of the product.
Similar articles
-
[Procedures for hand hygiene in German-speaking countries].Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1996 Dec;199(2-4):334-49. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1996. PMID: 9409922 Review. German.
-
Alcohol Sanitizer.2023 Aug 9. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan–. 2023 Aug 9. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan–. PMID: 30020626 Free Books & Documents.
-
Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD004288. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004288.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 22;(1):CD004288. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004288.pub3. PMID: 18254046 Updated. Review.
-
Dermatological aspects of a successful introduction and continuation of alcohol-based hand rubs for hygienic hand disinfection.J Hosp Infect. 2003 Sep;55(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00223-8. J Hosp Infect. 2003. PMID: 14505602 Review.
-
Efficacy of selected hand hygiene agents used to remove Bacillus atrophaeus (a surrogate of Bacillus anthracis) from contaminated hands.JAMA. 2003 Mar 12;289(10):1274-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1274. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 12633189 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Examining factors influencing public knowledge and practice of proper face mask usage during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.PeerJ. 2024 Feb 8;12:e16889. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16889. eCollection 2024. PeerJ. 2024. PMID: 38344298 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating ethanol concentrations against Staphylococcus spp: a proposal for improving nosocomial bacteria control.Infect Prev Pract. 2023 Dec 27;6(1):100336. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100336. eCollection 2024 Mar. Infect Prev Pract. 2023. PMID: 38274638 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Hygiene Behavior and COVID-19 Pandemic: Opportunities of COVID-19-Imposed Changes in Hygiene Behavior.Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231218421. doi: 10.1177/00469580231218421. Inquiry. 2023. PMID: 38140893 Free PMC article.
-
Using patients' observations to evaluate healthcare workers' alcohol-based hand rub with Pulpe'friction audits: a promising approach?GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2023 Nov 29;18:Doc29. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000455. eCollection 2023. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2023. PMID: 38111599 Free PMC article.
-
Efficiency of octenidine dihydrochloride alcohol combination compared to ethanol based skin antiseptics for preoperative skin preparation in dogs.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 7;18(11):e0293211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293211. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37934779 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abrishami, S. H., B. D. Tall, T. J. Bruursema, P. S. Epstein, and D. B. Shah. 1994. Bacterial adherence and viability on cutting board surfaces. J. Food Saf. 14:153-172.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources