Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

11
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Even the infinitesimal long Hertzian dipole that is resonant at no frequency can radiate. The length of an antenna has to do with the bandwidth at which it can radiate not the frequency. An antenna is not a resonator, an antenna is a matching circuit between the source generator's impedance (or the receiver's load impedance) and the $120\pi \Omega$ impedance of the TEM waves in vacuum. See my answer physics.stackexchange.com/questions/449947/… $\endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    Commented Jul 5 at 12:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @hyportnex 'Even the infinitesimal long Hertzian dipole that is resonant at no frequency can radiate.' This comment is correct but irrelevant. 'An antenna is not a resonator' This comment contradicts with what I read on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, for which Kraus, J.D., w8jk (1988). Antennas (2nd ed.) is the reference. $\endgroup$
    – my2cts
    Commented Jul 5 at 21:37
  • $\begingroup$ @hyportnex Fig. 5.7 at page 139 shows how various dipole antenna lengths create standing wave current patterns. Your comment also contradicts Kraus, a physicist, pioneer and world famous designer of antennas, author of the Antenna Bible. And isn't a lot of energy concentrated in a small bandwidth exactly the same thing as resonance? $\endgroup$
    – my2cts
    Commented Jul 5 at 21:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The length of a dipole antenna can be chosen so the antenna is resonant. It frequently is chosen otherwise. $\endgroup$
    – hobbs
    Commented Jul 5 at 23:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This should be the accepted answer. Other answers goes into a lot if details without even mentioning the wave speed in the conductor. $\endgroup$
    – blupp
    Commented Jul 7 at 15:36