Timeline for Upcoming initiatives on Stack Overflow and across the Stack Exchange network (July 2024)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22 at 17:16 | comment | added | Des StaffMod | @wizzwizz4 No, we consider voters as users who are contributing to content. | |
| Jul 9 at 17:06 | comment | added | bertieb |
(for those looking: add ###signup-popup to UBO's My filters section on the dashboard -- in chromium it should be something like chrome-extension://cjpalhdlnbpafiamejdnhcphjbkeiagm/dashboard.html#1p-filters.html)
|
|
| Jul 9 at 14:24 | comment | added | bertieb | You say, "It’s about helping users get the most from their experience with the product after they’ve raised their hand to sign up" -- but I'm getting the nag "Join $COMMUNITYNAME Be part of the community..." as soon as I view a page, which is definitely not "rais[ing] a hand to sign up" ! | |
| Jul 7 at 16:23 | comment | added | talex | "the biggest opportunity for improving user retention." and how exactly you planing to achieve that? | |
| Jul 4 at 18:29 | comment | added | wizzwizz4 | Does the category of "passive content consumers" include voters? | |
| Jul 3 at 19:43 | comment | added | Paul | "... improving user retention". Despite the "...is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct" admonition, new contributors are still treated unkindly and with a decided lack of patience. | |
| Jul 2 at 16:07 | comment | added | zcoop98 | @GSerg If the buzzwords refer to something real and tethered to reality, then I really think they're fine. It's when they become disconnected from actual, important things– things like how users engage with the platform, what value the platform provides, and how the platform can sustain itself. All of those are crucial to Stack sticking around, no matter what terms are used to describe them. Personally, I don't see this labelling of key aspects of the user experience as "a pinnacle of misunderstanding" at all; in fact, I think it's quite the opposite. | |
| Jul 2 at 14:14 | comment | added | Michael come lately | Thanks for clarifying. I, for one, incorrectly interpreted "activation." | |
| Jul 2 at 1:51 | comment | added | Andreas moved to Codidact | I thought Stack Overflow was supposed to be a resource for knowledge, not a product to buy. | |
| Jul 1 at 20:00 | comment | added | GSerg | Stack Overflow used to be a world wide phenomenon the value of which was blatantly self obvious. This was because the original creators of Stack Overflow specifically circled out what was wrong with the previous attempts and made it right. And then the new management took over, and began to demonstrate more and more alarming lack of understanding of what Stack Overflow was and why it had managed to become a world wide phenomenon. This flurry of hackneyed buzz words, addressing SO in terms of the sales funnel, is a pinnacle of the misunderstanding, and is a milestone on the road to the end. | |
| Jul 1 at 19:09 | history | answered | DesStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |