Re: [ai-control] Considerations for AI Opt-Out

Michael Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io> Mon, 22 April 2024 18:45 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <66D05E57-6474-414D-AF4C-409B063E970F@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <66D05E57-6474-414D-AF4C-409B063E970F@mnot.net>
From: Michael Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:45:10 -0600
Message-ID: <CAGJKSNQoDX0=h_-2efTtAdh2Ubk8WSs7sfF=AXLkmGU6GVKYmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: ai-control@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fd99df0616b3d6c7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ai-control/H2QWCyOYCMPeI3QiTX6pNcSjKQk>
Subject: Re: [ai-control] Considerations for AI Opt-Out
Precedence: list

Mark,
Thanks for this. Very well thought out.
Question, as we see more and more RAG focused approaches that blur the line
between traditional search (which in theory benefits crawled sites) and
generative AI crawling just for training content, how does that play out,
if at all from your perspective?

Mike Prorock
Founder
https://mesur.io/

On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 6:04 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> I've written down a few thoughts about how appropriate it is to use
> robots.txt for opt-out:
>   https://www.mnot.net/blog/2024/04/21/ai-control
>
> I'd be interested to hear what people think.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
> --
> ai-control mailing list
> ai-control@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ai-control
>

[ai-control] Considerations for AI Opt-Out Mark Nottingham
Re: [ai-control] Considerations for AI Opt-Out Michael Prorock
Re: [ai-control] Considerations for AI Opt-Out Mark Nottingham
[ai-control] Re: Considerations for AI Opt-Out Chris Needham
[ai-control] Re: Considerations for AI Opt-Out Mark Nottingham
[ai-control] Re: Considerations for AI Opt-Out Martin Thomson