Search results
- ...infrastructure, but also providing large portions of the functionality of Web 2.0 and other social media related functionality. The chart below provides some ...4 KB (549 words) - 20:26, 10 August 2023
- ...r.com/MartinBelam/status/1480231689809014800 (also in context of Matt/Anil Web 2.0 tweet discussions) ...14 KB (2,057 words) - 19:52, 10 February 2024
- ...ined meaning that has eroded over time due to repeated use and abuse—Ajax, Web 2.0, HTML5, UX—“the cloud” is a term that sets out to deceive from the outset, ...4 KB (641 words) - 01:54, 12 February 2024
- ...isionary sequels to the popularity of "[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0 Web 2.0]" to advocate for particular [[plumbing]] solutions looking for problems, s The first occurrences of "Web 3.0", occurred during the rise of "Web 2.0" in the mid-2000s, as early as May of 2006, e.g <abbr title="New York Times ...42 KB (6,070 words) - 08:23, 22 May 2024
- ...l Web 1.0 was, and still is, massively decentralized. And many aspects of "Web 2.0" were as well.<br><br>But to your point, the independent projects didn't ha ...6 KB (960 words) - 03:35, 22 May 2024
- We discuss if signing up for more web 2.0 silos (like for instance bufferapp.com) leads to more tracking and privacy ...5 KB (928 words) - 01:10, 31 May 2023
- ...nkered with it, but then her interest - and her site - vanished before the web 2.0 wave - never got an answer, why ...9 KB (1,465 words) - 21:00, 17 November 2020
- The mid-2000s Web 2.0 trend popularized free form tagging not part of any formal taxonomy (referr ...11 KB (1,738 words) - 15:47, 3 May 2023
- ...ages ago and it had a great atmosphere. Also a classic hangout during the Web 2.0 days so it may very well attract the crowd that remembers when blogging was ...9 KB (1,150 words) - 17:45, 2 October 2019
- ...tle = This is what email would have looked like if it were invented in the Web 2.0 era ...51 KB (5,673 words) - 21:34, 1 February 2024
- ...d.com/wp/archives/2006/05/web-20-the-first-25000-users-are-irrelevant.html Web 2.0: The First 25,000 Users Are Irrelevant]</cite> ...19 KB (2,866 words) - 01:22, 5 June 2024
- * Consider stubbing a [[Web 2.0]] page based on the [https://indieweb.org/wiki/index.php?search=%22Web+2.0% ...33 KB (5,053 words) - 21:16, 26 July 2024