Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid contractions #98

Open
rachaelbradley opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Avoid contractions #98

rachaelbradley opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@rachaelbradley
Copy link
Contributor

A suggestion that when contractions are not a standard part of the language, that WCAG 3 recommend against the use of contractions. These can often be difficult for many people with learning disabilities to read. See: Digital NZ .

Issue submitted via public-agwg-comments email. Respond to email with update when addressed.

@LJWatson
Copy link

The Digital NZ guidance is based on the UK Readability Guidelines. At the time of writing (around 2020), the Readability Guidelines found no research to indicate whether positive contractions were problematic or not, but noted that positive contractions can make content more readable in some cases. Conversely, the Readability Guidelines did find research to suggest that negative contractions can cause problems for some people.

When it comes time to discuss this in more detail, it may be helpful to consider the different types of contraction, rather than a blanket "avoid contractions".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants