-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
Issues: w3c/process
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Japanese translation of Process 2021
Closed: Question answered
Used when the discussion has reached a conclusion, but wasn't an actual issue against the Process.
Commenter satisfied/accepting
conclusion confirmed as accepted by the commenter, even if not preferred choice
Type: Question
informative role of chair/contact. fixes #765
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director Decision
Closing this issue was done with an explicit Director decision
Type: Editorial improvements
Normative prose for role of Chair / Team Contact cites informative reference for description
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director Decision
Closing this issue was done with an explicit Director decision
New W3C Council and updated TAG Composition section errantly only includes Tim Berners-Lee...
Closed: Invalid
Commenter satisfied/accepting
conclusion confirmed as accepted by the commenter, even if not preferred choice
Clarify 'formal contexts' for Formal Objections
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
Disambiguate sustain
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director-free (all)
All issues & pull request related to director-free. See also the topic-branch
Director-free: FO/Council
Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Type: Editorial improvements
Fix typo in description of Council formation
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
Dismissal wording
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director-free (all)
All issues & pull request related to director-free. See also the topic-branch
Director-free: FO/Council
Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Type: Editorial improvements
Minority Opinions
Closed: Question answered
Used when the discussion has reached a conclusion, but wasn't an actual issue against the Process.
Type: Question
Dissent in AC review
Closed: Retracted
Closed by the person who opened the issue, no longer requesting anything be done.
Editorial: dismissal
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Commenter satisfied/accepting
conclusion confirmed as accepted by the commenter, even if not preferred choice
Type: Editorial improvements
Avoid using two different meanings of "sustain"
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director-free (all)
All issues & pull request related to director-free. See also the topic-branch
Director-free: FO/Council
Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Type: Editorial improvements
Say that Chair Decision Appeals were also merged with Formal Objections.
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
Clarify where Submission Appeals go
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Commenter satisfied/accepting
conclusion confirmed as accepted by the commenter, even if not preferred choice
Type: Editorial improvements
Don't say that dissent goes away when it's overruled
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
AC Review dissent requirement vs questionnaire options
Closed: Question answered
Used when the discussion has reached a conclusion, but wasn't an actual issue against the Process.
Commenter satisfied/accepting
conclusion confirmed as accepted by the commenter, even if not preferred choice
Type: Question
���Tooling for Discussions and Publications” should be “Tooling and Archiving for Discussions and Publications
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
Broken link in changes section
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
Update SoTD
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
Type: Repository operation
editorial change to harmonize "website"/"Web site"
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
Use “W3C”, not “the W3C”
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
Editorial: "W3C" as a proper noun
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
Fix up inconsistencies in the confidentiality of FOs and Council Reports
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director-free (all)
All issues & pull request related to director-free. See also the topic-branch
Director-free: FO/Council
Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Speak of *a* Council, not *the* Council
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director-free: FO/Council
Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Type: Editorial improvements
Change who ratifies the TAG appointees
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director-free (all)
All issues & pull request related to director-free. See also the topic-branch
Director-free: TAG Appointments
Issues related to appointing TAG members in a director-free W3C
Previous Next
ProTip!
What’s not been updated in a month: updated:<2024-06-26.