Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should we recommend Client Hints as method for converting passive surfaces to active? #42

Open
JensenPaul opened this issue Jan 24, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Should we recommend Client Hints as method for converting passive surfaces to active? #42

JensenPaul opened this issue Jan 24, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@JensenPaul
Copy link

In the Best Practice 1 section should we recommend Client Hints as the way to convert HTTP-level passive fingerprintable surfaces to active ones?
@npdoty
Copy link
Collaborator

npdoty commented Aug 5, 2020

Client Hints are noted in Best Practice 6 "Require servers to advertise or opt in to access data", in the section on Detectability. Does that make sense or does it need to be included in "weighing increased fingerprinting surface"?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants
@npdoty @JensenPaul