Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Extend the Gutenberg UI to wp-admin #47530

Closed
tomxygen opened this issue Jan 29, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Extend the Gutenberg UI to wp-admin #47530

tomxygen opened this issue Jan 29, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
[Status] Duplicate Used to indicate that a current issue matches an existing one and can be closed

Comments

@tomxygen
Copy link

What problem does this address?

WordPress now features two very different design languages. The new modern and minimal Gutenberg design language and the old wp-admin style.

What is your proposed solution?

Expanding the Gutenberg design language to wp-admin would be great to unify the overall experience.

Are there any plans to do so?
@skorasaurus
Copy link
Member

Thanks for asking.

This has been asked in the past at #36115 and you can track its progress there. I don't believe there is any effort at the moment to rewrite wp-admin to be block-driven; but you can follow any progress in this issue.
@skorasaurus skorasaurus added the [Status] Duplicate Used to indicate that a current issue matches an existing one and can be closed label Jan 31, 2023
@tomxygen
Copy link
Author

tomxygen commented Feb 1, 2023

@skorasaurus thanks for your reply, however I don't mean to make wp admin block driven. I'm just talking about the design language.
I saw this article talking about a redesign of the WP Admin in the make wordpress site.
Any chance it could be turned into reality?
@carlomanf
Copy link

You also opened #47531 so let's keep this one closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Status] Duplicate Used to indicate that a current issue matches an existing one and can be closed
3 participants
@skorasaurus @carlomanf @tomxygen