Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recognize <b> markup as bold #43680

Closed
MarieComet opened this issue Aug 29, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #44086
Closed

Recognize <b> markup as bold #43680

MarieComet opened this issue Aug 29, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #44086
Labels
[Block] Classic Affects the Classic Editor Block [Package] Format library /packages/format-library [Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended

Comments

@MarieComet
Copy link
Contributor

MarieComet commented Aug 29, 2022

Description

In old WordPress versions, it was possible to add "fake" bold in the TinyMCE editor, which generated <b>lorem ipsum</b> tags.

When editing this old content in gutenberg, the fake bold is not recognized as bold, and it's not possible to remove it.

It should be useful that Gutenberg recognize this fake bold as bold, to allows to remove it.

Step-by-step reproduction instructions

Past a paragraph in code mode :
<p>Lorem <b>ipsum dolor</b> sit amet</p>

Go back to visual editor : it's not possible to remove the bold.

Screenshots, screen recording, code snippet

No response

Environment info

No response

Please confirm that you have searched existing issues in the repo.

Yes

Please confirm that you have tested with all plugins deactivated except Gutenberg.

Yes

@talldan talldan added [Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended [Block] Classic Affects the Classic Editor Block [Package] Format library /packages/format-library labels Aug 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Block] Classic Affects the Classic Editor Block [Package] Format library /packages/format-library [Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended
2 participants