Showing 1–16 of 16 results for author: Guarnieri, M

Do You Even Lift? Strengthening Compiler Security Guarantees Against Spectre Attacks

Authors: Xaver Fabian, Marco Patrignani, Marco Guarnieri, Michael Backes

Abstract: Mainstream compilers implement different countermeasures to prevent specific classes of speculative execution attacks. Unfortunately, these countermeasures either lack formal guarantees or come with proofs restricted to speculative semantics capturing only a subset of the speculation mechanisms supported by modern CPUs, thereby limiting their practical applicability. Ideally, these security proofs… ▽ More Mainstream compilers implement different countermeasures to prevent specific classes of speculative execution attacks. Unfortunately, these countermeasures either lack formal guarantees or come with proofs restricted to speculative semantics capturing only a subset of the speculation mechanisms supported by modern CPUs, thereby limiting their practical applicability. Ideally, these security proofs should target a speculative semantics capturing the effects of all speculation mechanisms implemented in modern CPUs. However, this is impractical and requires new secure compilation proofs to support additional speculation mechanisms. In this paper, we address this problem by proposing a novel secure compilation framework that allows lifting the security guarantees provided by Spectre countermeasures from weaker speculative semantics (ignoring some speculation mechanisms) to stronger ones (accounting for the omitted mechanisms) without requiring new secure compilation proofs. Using our lifting framework, we performed the most comprehensive security analysis of Spectre countermeasures implemented in mainstream compilers to date. Our analysis spans 9 different countermeasures against 5 classes of Spectre attacks, which we proved secure against a speculative semantics accounting for five different speculation mechanisms. △ Less

Submitted 16 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Testing side-channel security of cryptographic implementations against future microarchitectures

Authors: Gilles Barthe, Marcel Böhme, Sunjay Cauligi, Chitchanok Chuengsatiansup, Daniel Genkin, Marco Guarnieri, David Mateos Romero, Peter Schwabe, David Wu, Yuval Yarom

Abstract: How will future microarchitectures impact the security of existing cryptographic implementations? As we cannot keep reducing the size of transistors, chip vendors have started developing new microarchitectural optimizations to speed up computation. A recent study (Sanchez Vicarte et al., ISCA 2021) suggests that these optimizations might open the Pandora's box of microarchitectural attacks. Howeve… ▽ More How will future microarchitectures impact the security of existing cryptographic implementations? As we cannot keep reducing the size of transistors, chip vendors have started developing new microarchitectural optimizations to speed up computation. A recent study (Sanchez Vicarte et al., ISCA 2021) suggests that these optimizations might open the Pandora's box of microarchitectural attacks. However, there is little guidance on how to evaluate the security impact of future optimization proposals. To help chip vendors explore the impact of microarchitectural optimizations on cryptographic implementations, we develop (i) an expressive domain-specific language, called LmSpec, that allows them to specify the leakage model for the given optimization and (ii) a testing framework, called LmTest, to automatically detect leaks under the specified leakage model within the given implementation. Using this framework, we conduct an empirical study of 18 proposed microarchitectural optimizations on 25 implementations of eight cryptographic primitives in five popular libraries. We find that every implementation would contain secret-dependent leaks, sometimes sufficient to recover a victim's secret key, if these optimizations were realized. Ironically, some leaks are possible only because of coding idioms used to prevent leaks under the standard constant-time model. △ Less

Submitted 1 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Synthesizing Hardware-Software Leakage Contracts for RISC-V Open-Source Processors

Authors: Gideon Mohr, Marco Guarnieri, Jan Reineke

Abstract: Microarchitectural attacks compromise security by exploiting software-visible artifacts of microarchitectural optimizations such as caches and speculative execution. Defending against such attacks at the software level requires an appropriate abstraction at the instruction set architecture (ISA) level that captures microarchitectural leakage. Hardware-software leakage contracts have recently been… ▽ More Microarchitectural attacks compromise security by exploiting software-visible artifacts of microarchitectural optimizations such as caches and speculative execution. Defending against such attacks at the software level requires an appropriate abstraction at the instruction set architecture (ISA) level that captures microarchitectural leakage. Hardware-software leakage contracts have recently been proposed as such an abstraction. In this paper, we propose a semi-automatic methodology for synthesizing hardware-software leakage contracts for open-source microarchitectures. For a given ISA, our approach relies on human experts to (a) capture the space of possible contracts in the form of contract templates and (b) devise a test-case generation strategy to explore a microarchitecture's potential leakage. For a given implementation of an ISA, these two ingredients are then used to automatically synthesize the most precise leakage contract that is satisfied by the microarchitecture. We have instantiated this methodology for the RISC-V ISA and applied it to the Ibex and CVA6 open-source processors. Our experiments demonstrate the practical applicability of the methodology and uncover subtle and unexpected leaks. △ Less

Submitted 17 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Specification and Verification of Side-channel Security for Open-source Processors via Leakage Contracts

Authors: Zilong Wang, Gideon Mohr, Klaus von Gleissenthall, Jan Reineke, Marco Guarnieri

Abstract: Leakage contracts have recently been proposed as a new security abstraction at the Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) level. Such contracts aim to faithfully capture the information processors may leak through side effects of their microarchitectural implementations. However, so far, we lack a verification methodology to check that a processor actually satisfies a given leakage contract. In this p… ▽ More Leakage contracts have recently been proposed as a new security abstraction at the Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) level. Such contracts aim to faithfully capture the information processors may leak through side effects of their microarchitectural implementations. However, so far, we lack a verification methodology to check that a processor actually satisfies a given leakage contract. In this paper, we address this problem by developing LeaVe, the first tool for verifying register-transfer-level (RTL) processor designs against ISA-level leakage contracts. To this end, we introduce a decoupling theorem that separates security and functional correctness concerns when verifying contract satisfaction. LeaVe leverages this decoupling to make verification of contract satisfaction practical. To scale to realistic processor designs LeaVe further employs inductive reasoning on relational abstractions. Using LeaVe, we precisely characterize the side-channel security guarantees provided by three open-source RISC-V processors, thereby obtaining the first contract satisfaction proofs for RTL processor designs. △ Less

Submitted 27 September, 2023; v1 submitted 11 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: Technical report containing full formalization and proofs of all results. A short version of this report (with the same title) appears in the proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communication Security (CCS 2023)

Hide and Seek with Spectres: Efficient discovery of speculative information leaks with random testing

Authors: Oleksii Oleksenko, Marco Guarnieri, Boris Köpf, Mark Silberstein

Abstract: Attacks like Spectre abuse speculative execution, one of the key performance optimizations of modern CPUs. Recently, several testing tools have emerged to automatically detect speculative leaks in commercial (black-box) CPUs. However, the testing process is still slow, which has hindered in-depth testing campaigns, and so far prevented the discovery of new classes of leakage. In this paper, we i… ▽ More Attacks like Spectre abuse speculative execution, one of the key performance optimizations of modern CPUs. Recently, several testing tools have emerged to automatically detect speculative leaks in commercial (black-box) CPUs. However, the testing process is still slow, which has hindered in-depth testing campaigns, and so far prevented the discovery of new classes of leakage. In this paper, we identify the root causes of the performance limitations in existing approaches, and propose techniques to overcome these limitations. With these techniques, we improve the testing speed over the state-of-the-art by up to two orders of magnitude. These improvements enable us to run a testing campaign of unprecedented depth on Intel and AMD CPUs. As a highlight, we discover two types of previously unknown speculative leaks (affecting string comparison and division) that have escaped previous manual and automatic analyses. △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: To appear in IEEE S&P 2023

Automatic Detection of Speculative Execution Combinations

Authors: Xaver Fabian, Marco Guarnieri, Marco Patrignani

Abstract: Modern processors employ different prediction mechanisms to speculate over different kinds of instructions. Attackers can exploit these prediction mechanisms simultaneously in order to trigger leaks about speculatively-accessed data. Thus, sound reasoning about such speculative leaks requires accounting for all potential mechanisms of speculation. Unfortunately, existing formal models only support… ▽ More Modern processors employ different prediction mechanisms to speculate over different kinds of instructions. Attackers can exploit these prediction mechanisms simultaneously in order to trigger leaks about speculatively-accessed data. Thus, sound reasoning about such speculative leaks requires accounting for all potential mechanisms of speculation. Unfortunately, existing formal models only support reasoning about fixed, hard-coded mechanisms of speculation, with no simple support to extend said reasoning to new mechanisms. In this paper we develop a framework for reasoning about composed speculative semantics that capture speculation due to different mechanisms and implement it as part of the Spectector verification tool. We implement novel semantics for speculating over store and return instructions and combine them with the semantics for speculating over branches. Our framework yields speculative semantics for speculating over any combination of those instructions that are secure by construction, i.e., we obtain these security guarantees for free. The implementation of our novel semantics in Spectector let us verify existing codebases that are vulnerable to Spectre v1, Spectre v4, and Spectre v5 vulnerabilities as well as new snippets that are only vulnerable to their compositions. △ Less

Submitted 2 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

A Turning Point for Verified Spectre Sandboxing

Authors: Sunjay Cauligi, Marco Guarnieri, Daniel Moghimi, Deian Stefan, Marco Vassena

Abstract: Spectre attacks enable an attacker to access restricted data in an application's memory. Both the academic community and industry veterans have developed several mitigations to block Spectre attacks, but to date, very few have been formally vetted; most are "best effort" strategies. Formal guarantees are particularly crucial for protecting isolated environments like sandboxing against Spectre atta… ▽ More Spectre attacks enable an attacker to access restricted data in an application's memory. Both the academic community and industry veterans have developed several mitigations to block Spectre attacks, but to date, very few have been formally vetted; most are "best effort" strategies. Formal guarantees are particularly crucial for protecting isolated environments like sandboxing against Spectre attacks. In such environments, a subtle flaw in the mitigation would allow untrusted code to break out of the sandbox and access trusted memory regions. In our work, we develop principled foundations to build isolated environments resistant against Spectre attacks. We propose a formal framework for reasoning about sandbox execution and Spectre attacks. We formalize properties that sound mitigation strategies must fulfill and we show how various existing mitigations satisfy (or fail to satisfy!) these properties. △ Less

Submitted 2 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

ANOSY: Approximated Knowledge Synthesis with Refinement Types for Declassification

Authors: Sankha Narayan Guria, Niki Vazou, Marco Guarnieri, James Parker

Abstract: Non-interference is a popular way to enforce confidentiality of sensitive data. However, declassification of sensitive information is often needed in realistic applications but breaks non-interference. We present ANOSY, an approximate knowledge synthesizer for quantitative declassification policies. ANOSY uses refinement types to automatically construct machine checked over- and under-approximatio… ▽ More Non-interference is a popular way to enforce confidentiality of sensitive data. However, declassification of sensitive information is often needed in realistic applications but breaks non-interference. We present ANOSY, an approximate knowledge synthesizer for quantitative declassification policies. ANOSY uses refinement types to automatically construct machine checked over- and under-approximations of attacker knowledge for boolean queries on multi-integer secrets. It also provides an AnosyT monad to track the attacker knowledge over multiple declassification queries and checks for violations against user-specified policies in information flow control applications. We implement a prototype of ANOSY and show that it is precise and permissive: up to 14 declassification queries are permitted before a policy violation occurs using the powerset of intervals domain. △ Less

Submitted 22 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: 16 pages, 6 figures, this is a preprint of a paper to appear in Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI) 2022

Contract-Aware Secure Compilation

Authors: Marco Guarnieri, Marco Patrignani

Abstract: Microarchitectural attacks exploit the abstraction gap between the Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) and how instructions are actually executed by processors to compromise the confidentiality and integrity of a system. To secure systems against microarchitectural attacks, programmers need to reason about and program against these microarchitectural side-effects. However, we cannot -- and should n… ▽ More Microarchitectural attacks exploit the abstraction gap between the Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) and how instructions are actually executed by processors to compromise the confidentiality and integrity of a system. To secure systems against microarchitectural attacks, programmers need to reason about and program against these microarchitectural side-effects. However, we cannot -- and should not -- expect programmers to manually tailor programs for specific processors and their security guarantees. Instead, we could rely on compilers (and the secure compilation community), as they can play a prominent role in bridging this gap: compilers should target specific processors microarchitectural security guarantees and they should leverage these guarantees to produce secure code. To achieve this, we outline the idea of Contract-Aware Secure COmpilation (CASCO) where compilers are parametric with respect to a hardware/software security-contract, an abstraction capturing a processor's security guarantees. That is, compilers will automatically leverage the guarantees formalized in the contract to ensure that program-level security properties are preserved at microarchitectural level. △ Less

Submitted 28 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Hardware-Software Contracts for Secure Speculation

Authors: Marco Guarnieri, Boris Köpf, Jan Reineke, Pepe Vila

Abstract: Since the discovery of Spectre, a large number of hardware mechanisms for secure speculation has been proposed. Intuitively, more defensive mechanisms are less efficient but can securely execute a larger class of programs, while more permissive mechanisms may offer more performance but require more defensive programming. Unfortunately, there are no hardware-software contracts that would turn this… ▽ More Since the discovery of Spectre, a large number of hardware mechanisms for secure speculation has been proposed. Intuitively, more defensive mechanisms are less efficient but can securely execute a larger class of programs, while more permissive mechanisms may offer more performance but require more defensive programming. Unfortunately, there are no hardware-software contracts that would turn this intuition into a basis for principled co-design. In this paper, we put forward a framework for specifying such contracts, and we demonstrate its expressiveness and flexibility. On the hardware side, we use the framework to provide the first formalization and comparison of the security guarantees provided by a representative class of mechanisms for secure speculation. On the software side, we use the framework to characterize program properties that guarantee secure co-design in two scenarios traditionally investigated in isolation: (1) ensuring that a benign program does not leak information while computing on confidential data, and (2) ensuring that a potentially malicious program cannot read outside of its designated sandbox. Finally, we show how the properties corresponding to both scenarios can be checked based on existing tools for software verification, and we use them to validate our findings on executable code. △ Less

Submitted 1 October, 2020; v1 submitted 6 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: Camera ready version that will appear in the proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (IEEE S&P 2021). A technical report containing a full formalization and proofs of all results is available at arXiv:2006.03841v2

Flushgeist: Cache Leaks from Beyond the Flush

Authors: Pepe Vila, Andreas Abel, Marco Guarnieri, Boris Köpf, Jan Reineke

Abstract: Flushing the cache, using instructions like clflush and wbinvd, is commonly proposed as a countermeasure against access-based cache attacks. In this report, we show that several Intel caches, specifically the L1 caches in some pre-Skylake processors and the L2 caches in some post-Broadwell processors, leak information even after being flushed through clflush and wbinvd instructions. That is, secur… ▽ More Flushing the cache, using instructions like clflush and wbinvd, is commonly proposed as a countermeasure against access-based cache attacks. In this report, we show that several Intel caches, specifically the L1 caches in some pre-Skylake processors and the L2 caches in some post-Broadwell processors, leak information even after being flushed through clflush and wbinvd instructions. That is, security-critical assumptions about the behavior of clflush and wbinvd instructions are incorrect, and countermeasures that rely on them should be revised. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2020; v1 submitted 28 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: 6 pages, 4 figures

CacheQuery: Learning Replacement Policies from Hardware Caches

Authors: Pepe Vila, Pierre Ganty, Marco Guarnieri, Boris Köpf

Abstract: We show how to infer deterministic cache replacement policies using off-the-shelf automata learning and program synthesis techniques. For this, we construct and chain two abstractions that expose the cache replacement policy of any set in the cache hierarchy as a membership oracle to the learning algorithm, based on timing measurements on a silicon CPU. Our experiments demonstrate an advantage in… ▽ More We show how to infer deterministic cache replacement policies using off-the-shelf automata learning and program synthesis techniques. For this, we construct and chain two abstractions that expose the cache replacement policy of any set in the cache hierarchy as a membership oracle to the learning algorithm, based on timing measurements on a silicon CPU. Our experiments demonstrate an advantage in scope and scalability over prior art and uncover 2 previously undocumented cache replacement policies. △ Less

Submitted 26 May, 2020; v1 submitted 20 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Comments: 17 pages, 5 tables, 5 figures

Exorcising Spectres with Secure Compilers

Authors: Marco Patrignani, Marco Guarnieri

Abstract: Attackers can access sensitive information of programs by exploiting the side-effects of speculatively-executed instructions using Spectre attacks. To mitigate theses attacks, popular compilers deployed a wide range of countermeasures. The security of these countermeasures, however, has not been ascertained: while some of them are believed to be secure, others are known to be insecure and result i… ▽ More Attackers can access sensitive information of programs by exploiting the side-effects of speculatively-executed instructions using Spectre attacks. To mitigate theses attacks, popular compilers deployed a wide range of countermeasures. The security of these countermeasures, however, has not been ascertained: while some of them are believed to be secure, others are known to be insecure and result in vulnerable programs. To reason about the security guarantees of these compiler-inserted countermeasures, this paper presents a framework comprising several secure compilation criteria characterizing when compilers produce code resistant against Spectre attacks. With this framework, we perform a comprehensive security analysis of compiler-level countermeasures against Spectre attacks implemented in major compilers. This work provides sound foundations to formally reason about the security of compiler-level countermeasures against Spectre attacks as well as the first proofs of security and insecurity of said countermeasures. △ Less

Submitted 10 September, 2021; v1 submitted 18 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

SPECTECTOR: Principled Detection of Speculative Information Flows

Authors: Marco Guarnieri, Boris Köpf, José F. Morales, Jan Reineke, Andrés Sánchez

Abstract: Since the advent of SPECTRE, a number of countermeasures have been proposed and deployed. Rigorously reasoning about their effectiveness, however, requires a well-defined notion of security against speculative execution attacks, which has been missing until now. In this paper (1) we put forward speculative non-interference, the first semantic notion of security against speculative execution attack… ▽ More Since the advent of SPECTRE, a number of countermeasures have been proposed and deployed. Rigorously reasoning about their effectiveness, however, requires a well-defined notion of security against speculative execution attacks, which has been missing until now. In this paper (1) we put forward speculative non-interference, the first semantic notion of security against speculative execution attacks, and (2) we develop SPECTECTOR, an algorithm based on symbolic execution to automatically prove speculative non-interference, or to detect violations. We implement SPECTECTOR in a tool, which we use to detect subtle leaks and optimizations opportunities in the way major compilers place SPECTRE countermeasures. A scalability analysis indicates that checking speculative non-interference does not exhibit fundamental bottlenecks beyond those inherited by symbolic execution. △ Less

Submitted 24 July, 2019; v1 submitted 20 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Comments: 40 pages, technical report with proofs. To appear at IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2020

Securing Databases from Probabilistic Inference

Authors: Marco Guarnieri, Srdjan Marinovic, David Basin

Abstract: Databases can leak confidential information when users combine query results with probabilistic data dependencies and prior knowledge. Current research offers mechanisms that either handle a limited class of dependencies or lack tractable enforcement algorithms. We propose a foundation for Database Inference Control based on ProbLog, a probabilistic logic programming language. We leverage this fou… ▽ More Databases can leak confidential information when users combine query results with probabilistic data dependencies and prior knowledge. Current research offers mechanisms that either handle a limited class of dependencies or lack tractable enforcement algorithms. We propose a foundation for Database Inference Control based on ProbLog, a probabilistic logic programming language. We leverage this foundation to develop Angerona, a provably secure enforcement mechanism that prevents information leakage in the presence of probabilistic dependencies. We then provide a tractable inference algorithm for a practically relevant fragment of ProbLog. We empirically evaluate Angerona's performance showing that it scales to relevant security-critical problems. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Comments: A short version of this paper has been accepted at the 30th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF 2017)

Strong and Provably Secure Database Access Control

Authors: Marco Guarnieri, Srdjan Marinovic, David Basin

Abstract: Existing SQL access control mechanisms are extremely limited. Attackers can leak information and escalate their privileges using advanced database features such as views, triggers, and integrity constraints. This is not merely a problem of vendors lagging behind the state-of-the-art. The theoretical foundations for database security lack adequate security definitions and a realistic attacker model… ▽ More Existing SQL access control mechanisms are extremely limited. Attackers can leak information and escalate their privileges using advanced database features such as views, triggers, and integrity constraints. This is not merely a problem of vendors lagging behind the state-of-the-art. The theoretical foundations for database security lack adequate security definitions and a realistic attacker model, both of which are needed to evaluate the security of modern databases. We address these issues and present a provably secure access control mechanism that prevents attacks that defeat popular SQL database systems. △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2016; v1 submitted 4 December, 2015; originally announced December 2015.

Comments: A short version of this paper has been published in the proceedings of the 1st IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P 2016)