Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 7:11:597.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00597. eCollection 2017.

Gender Differences in Food Choice: Effects of Superior Temporal Sulcus Stimulation

Affiliations

Gender Differences in Food Choice: Effects of Superior Temporal Sulcus Stimulation

Valerio Manippa et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

The easy availability of food has caused a shift from eating for survival to hedonic eating. Women, compared to men, have shown to respond differently to food cues in the environment on a behavioral and a neural level, in particular to energy rich (compared to low energy) foods. It has been demonstrated that the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS) is the only region exhibiting greater activation for high vs. low calorie food choices. In order to test for a possible causal role of STS in food choice, we applied high frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on STS assuming a different response pattern between males and females. Our participants (18 females, 17 males) performed a forced choice task between food pairs matched for individual liking but differed in calorie, during the left STS, right STS stimulation and sham condition. Male participants showed a general preference for low calorie (LC) foods compared to females. In addition, we observed in males, but not in females, an increase of high calorie (HC) food choice during right STS tRNS compared to sham condition and left STS tRNS. Finally, we found an increase of missed choices during right STS stimulation compared to sham condition and left STS stimulation. In conclusion, thanks to tRNS evidence, we both confirm the involvement and suggest a causal role of right posterior STS in feeding behavior. Moreover, we suggest that gender differences exist in STS mechanisms underlying food choice.

Keywords: calorie; food choice; food evaluation; sex differences; superior temporal sulcus; transcranial random noise stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial sequence in the food rating task.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Two consecutive examples of forced choice task trials carried out during high-frequency (HF) transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) conditions. In the 3 s lapse of food pairs presentation, participants had to make their choice by key press. Top left: position of the right superior temporal sulcus (STS) electrode, the reference electrode was placed on the left shoulder (and vice versa for left STS electrode).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Interaction between tRNS condition and participants gender on % of high-calorie (HC) food choice (lSTS, left posterior STS stimulation; SH, Sham control condition; rSTS, right posterior STS stimulation). Data are presented as mean values + standard errors. *p < 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of tRNS condition on rank transformed % of missed choices (lSTS, left posterior STS stimulation; SH, Sham control condition; rSTS, right posterior STS stimulation). Data are presented as mean values + standard errors. *p < 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arganini C., Turrini A., Saba A., Virgili F., Comitato R. (2012). “Gender differences in food choice and dietary intake in modern western societies,” in Public Health—Social and Behavioral Health, ed. Maddock J. (Rijeka: InTech Open Access Publisher; ), 85–102.
    1. Barnes C. L., Pandya D. N. (1992). Efferent cortical connections of multimodal cortex of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 318, 222–244. 10.1002/cne.903180207 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berridge K. C. (1999). “Pleasure, pain, desire and dread: hidden core processes of emotion,” in Well-Being: The foundations of Hedonic Psychology, eds Kahneman D., Diener E., Schwarz N. (New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; ), 525–557.
    1. Birch L. L. (1999). Development of food preferences. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 19, 41–62. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.19.1.41 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braun C. M., Chouinard M. J. (1992). Is anorexia nervosa a neuropsychological disease? Neuropsychol. Rev. 3, 171–212. 10.1007/BF01108842 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources